1,086
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Genetic Resources Evaluation

Genotype by Environment Interaction and Yield Stability of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Genotypes Evaluated in Western Ethiopia

, , , &
Pages 467-483 | Received 14 Feb 2022, Accepted 11 Oct 2022, Published online: 30 Oct 2022

References

  • Agegnehu, G. (2020). A guidebook on soil fertility and plant nutrient management. Addis Ababa.
  • Al-Naggar, A. M. M., Abd El-Salam, R. M., & Asran, M. R. Yaseen WY. (2018). Yield adaptability and stability of grain sorghum genotypes across different environments in Egypt using AMMI and GGE-biplot models. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 1–16.
  • Ameha, M., & Belachew, B. (1987). Genotype by environment interaction and its implication on selection for improved quality in arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) ASIC,17e colloque, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Becker, H. C., & Leon, J. (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x
  • Beksisa, L., Alamerew, S., Ayano, A., & Daba, G. (2018). Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) genotypes. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(4), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2017.12788
  • Belay, Y. (2016) Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability of white seeded sesame (sesamum indicum L.) genotypes in northern Ethiopia. M.Sc. thesis, Haramaya
  • Belete, Y., & Belachew, B. (2008). Girma Adugna, Bayetta Belachew, Tesfaye Shimber, Endale Taye, Taye Kufa (eds.).coffee diversity and knowledge. Proceedings of a national workshop four decades of coffee research and development in Ethiopia. In Cultivar by environment interaction and stability analysis of Arabica genotypes. Addis Ababa. 14-17 August 2007. 58–63.
  • Belete, Y., Belachew, B., & Chemeda, F. (2014). Stability analysis of bean yields of arabica coffee genotypes across different environments. Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 018–026.
  • Boansi, D., & Crentsil, C. (2013). Competitiveness and determinants of coffee exports, producer price and production for Ethiopia. Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and International Business, 1(1), 31–50.
  • Coste, R. (1992). Coffee the plant and the product. MacMillan Press.
  • Crossa, J. (1990). Statistical analyses of multi-location trials. In Advances in agronomy (Vol. 44, pp. 55–85). Academic Press.
  • Crossa, J., Hg, G., Jr, & Zobel, R. W. (1990). Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Science, 30(3), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030003x
  • CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2019). Agricultural sample survey: report on area and production of major crops of private peasant holdings for meher season of 2018. Addis Ababa
  • CSA (Central statistical authority). (2017). Agricultural sample survey report on area, production and yields of major crops.
  • Demesse, M., Kebede, M., & Taye, G. (2011). Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of coffee germplasms from southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 34(1), 63–70.
  • Eberhart, S. A., & Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop Science, 28(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
  • Eisemann, R. L., Cooper, M., & Woodruff DR. (1990). Beyond the analytical methodology, better interpretation and exploitation of GE interaction in plant breeding. In M. S. Kang (Ed.), Genotype-by- environment interaction and plant breeding (pp. 108–117). Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge.
  • Farshadfar, E., Mahmodi, N., & Yaghotipoor A. (2011). AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 1837–1844.
  • Gauch, H. G., & Zobel, R. W. (1988). Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analysis of yield trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288824
  • Ghaderi, A., Everson, E. H., & Cress, C. E. (1980). Classification of environments and genotypes in wheat. Crop Science, 20(6), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000060008x
  • Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (Second) ed.). John Willy and Sons. Inc.
  • Hirpa, L., Nigussie, D., Setegn, G., Geremew, B., & Ferew, M. (2013). Response to soil acidity of common bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under field conditions at Nedjo, Western Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 2(3), 03–15. https://doi.org/10.4314/star.v2i3.98714
  • Hongyu, K., García-Peña, M., de Araújo Lb, Dos Santos Dias Ct, Araújo, L. B. D., & Santos Dias, C. T. D. (2014). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI analysis of genotype by environment interaction. Biometrical Letters, 51(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2014-0007
  • Karimizadeh, R., Mohammadi, M., Sabaghnia, N., & Shefazadeh, M. K. (2012). Using different aspects of stability concepts for interpreting genotype by environment interaction of some lentil genotypes. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(6), 1017.
  • Kufa, T. (2010). Environmental sustainability and coffee diversity in Africa. http://dev.ico.org/event_pdfs/wcc2010/presentationswcc-2010-kufa-notese-pdf/ accessed date November, 10/2011.
  • Kufa, T. (2018). Coffee research in Ethiopia: Heart of value chain.Paper presented on, international coffee event in Ethiopia-the land of origins. December 4-5, 2018, United Nations Conference Center, Addis Ababa.
  • Kumaresan, D., & Nadarajan, N. (2010). Genotype by environment interactions for seed yield and its components in sesame (sesamum indicum L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(4), 1126–1132.
  • Legesse, A. (2017). Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis of some is promising Illu-Ababora coffee (Coffea arabica L.) genotypes for yield and yield related traits in southwestern Ethiopia. M.Sc thesis, Jimma University.
  • Lin, C. S., & Binns, M. S. (1988). A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar x location data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 68(1), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps88-018
  • Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R., & Lefkovitch, L. P. (1986). Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Science, 26(5), 894–900. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x
  • Mamo, G., Adugna, G., Getnet, M., GizachewLegesse, D. T., & Alemayehu, D. (2008). In Girma adugna, Bayetta Bellachew,Tesfaye Shimbir, Endale Taye and Taye Kufa (eds.). Coffee diversity and knowledge. Proceedings of a national workshop four decades of coffee research and development in Ethiopia. G. Adugna, B. Belachew, T. Shimber, & E. Taye Eds. Agrometeorology and geographic information system to enhance coffee research and development.pp. 130-139, 14-17 August 2007. Addis Ababa.
  • Merga ,W.S. (2019). Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability analysis of advanced Teppi coffee (Coffea arabica L.) genotypes in lowland agro-ecology of southwestern Ethiopia. M.Sc thesis, Jimma University
  • Mohammadi, R., Abdulahi, A., Haghparast, R., & Armion, M. (2007). Interpreting genotype- environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using non-parametric methods. Euphytica, 157(1–2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9417-3
  • Oliveira, E. J., & Godoy, I. J. (2006). Pod yield stability analysis of runner peanut lines using AMMI. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 6, 311–317.
  • Purchase, J. L. (1997). parametric analysis to describe genotype by environment Interaction and yield Stability in winter wheat. Dissertation, University of the Free State
  • Purchase, J. L., Hatting, H., & Van Deventer, C. S. (2000). Genotype by environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African J Plant and Soil, 17(3), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878
  • Robertson, A. (1959). Genetic variability and genotype by environment interaction in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Biometrics, 15(3), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527750
  • Roger, P., Murray, D., Harding, S., Baird, D., & Soutar, D. (2014). Introduction to GenStat for Windows ® TM (17) ed.). VSN International, 5.
  • SAS. (2014). Statistical analysis system (version 9.4).
  • Steel, R., & Torrie, J. (1998). Principles and procedures of statistics a biometrical approach (2nd) ed., pp. 471–472). Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.
  • Taye, E., Kufa, T., Nestre, A., Shimber, T., Yilma, A., & Ayano, T. (2008). Research on coffee field management.pp.187-195. In G. Adugna, B. Belachew, T. Shimber, Taye, E., & Kufa, T. (Eds.) Coffee diversity and knowledge. Proceedings of a National Workshop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia. 14-17 August 2007 Addis Ababa
  • Tefera, F. (2017) Variability and genotype by environment interaction for quantitative and qualitative traits of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) hybrids in southwestern Ethiopia, Dissertation, Jimma University.
  • Wakjira, A., & Labuschagne, M. T. (2002). Genotype by environment interaction and phenotypic stability analyses of linseed in Ethiopia. Plant Breeding, 121(1), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00670.x
  • Walyaro, D. J. (1983). Considerations in breeding for improved yield and quality in Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University
  • Wricke, G. (1962). ber eine methode zur erfassung der ökologischen Streubreite in field versuchen. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg, 47, 92–96.
  • Wrigley, G. (1988). Coffee Tropical Agriculture Series. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman group UK Limited.
  • Yousefi, B., Tabaie-Aghdaie, S. R., Assareh, M. H., & Darvish, F. (2011). Evaluation of stability parameters for discrimination of stable, adaptable and high flower yielding landraces of Rosa damascena. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 13, 99–110.
  • Zobel, R. W., Wright, M. S., & Gauch, H. G. (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal, 80(3), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x