A newly designed loop for en-masse anterior retraction - a finite element study

References

• Tominaga JY, Ozaki H, Chiang P-C, et al. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146:166–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:442–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar A, Valiathan A. Intra-arch Retraction Mechanics-A contemporary review. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2006;40:101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Burstone CJ. The segmented arch approach to space closure. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:361–378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faulkner MG, Lipsett AW, El-Rayes K, et al. On the use of vertical loops in retraction systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99:328–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staggers JA, Germane N. Clinical considerations in the use of retraction mechanics. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25:364–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nanda R. Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders company; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis PD. Canine retraction. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:543–560.
   Google Scholar
• Cai Y. Finite element analysis of archwire parameters and activation forces on the M/F ratio of vertical, L- and T-loops. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safavi MR, Geramy A, Khezri AK. M/F ratios of four different closing loops: 3D analysis using the finite element method (FEM). Aust Orthod J. 2006;22:121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlberg AJ, Burstone CJ. T-loop position and anchorage control. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AS, Ravindranath VK, Karandikar GR, et al. Comparative assessment of efficacy of four different designs of retraction loops made of beta titanium archwire: a finite element study. J Contemp Dent. 2014;4:6.
   Google Scholar
• Kamisetty SK, Raghuveer N, Rajavikram N, et al. Evaluation of effects and effectiveness of various α and β angulations for three different loop made of stainless steel arch wires - a FEM study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:ZC33–7.
   Google Scholar
• Siatkowski RE. Continuous arch wire closing loop design, optimization, and verification. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:393–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siatkowski RE. Continuous arch wire closing loop design, optimization, and verification. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:487–495.
   Google Scholar
• Burstone C, Smith RJ. Mechanics of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1984;81:224–227.
   Google Scholar
• Lindauer SJ. The basics of orthodontic mechanics. Semin Orthod. 2001;7:2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vikram NR, Hashir YM, Karthikeyan MK. Finite Element Method in Orthodontics. Indian J Multidiscip Dent. Chennai. 2010;1:40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Choy KC, Kim KH, Park YC. Factors affecting force system of orthodontic loop spring. Korean J Orthod. 1999;29:511–519.
   Google Scholar
• Kusy RP. Comparison of nickel-titanium and beta titanium wire sizes to conventional orthodontic arch wire materials. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:625–629.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheibaninia A, Salehi A, Asatourian A. Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Beta titanium: a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:121–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• do Ferreira MA, Rodrigues FRM, Luersen MA, et al. Von Mises stresses on Mushroom-loop archwires for incisor retraction: a numerical study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020;25:44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios P, Uribe F, Nanda R. Correction of an asymmetrical Class II malocclusion using predictable force systems. J Clin Orthod. 2007;41:211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Uribe F, Nanda R. Treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusion in adults: biomechanical considerations. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37:599–606; quiz 625.
   Google Scholar
• Chacko A, Tikku T, Khanna R, et al. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of closed helical loop and T-loop for space closure in lingual orthodontics—a finite element study. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar