Baan Fai Rim Ping: a haptic approach to the phenomenon of genius loci by a riverside residence in Thailand

References

• Askland, H., R. Awad, J. Chambers, and M. Chapman. 2014. “Anthropological Quests in Architecture: Pursuing the Human Subject.” International Journal of Architectural Research 8 (3): 284–295.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. 1969. The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, M. 2012. “Participatory Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Work, edited by M. Grey, J. Midgley, and S. A. Webb. London: Sage Publications. pp. 467–481.
   Google Scholar
• Bannon, L. J., and P. Ehn. 2013. “Design: Design Matters in Participatory Design.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson. London: Routledge. pp. 37–63.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, D. 1995. “Afterword.” In The Home: Words, Interpretations, Meanings and Environments. Ethnoscapes: Current Challenges in the Environmental Social Sciences, edited by D. Benjamin, D. Stea, and E. Arén. Avebury: Aldershot. pp. 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. 2007. “Experiencing Architecture with Seven Senses, Not One.” Architectural Record 195 (11): 65–66.
   Google Scholar
• Chananitithum, K. 2017a. “Personal Interview by C.” Louhapensang, 6 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chananitithum, K. 2017b. “Personal Interview by C.” Louhapensang, 19 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, F. D. K., and C. Adams. 2001. Building Construction Illustrated. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Computer Professionals for Social Responsibilities (CPSR). (2005). “Participatory Design.” Issues. http://cpsr.org/issues/pd/
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, B. J., and E. Whitmore. 1998. “Framing Participatory Evaluation.” New Directions for Evaluation 80 (80): 5–23. doi:10.1002/ev.1114.
   Google Scholar
• Donlyn, L., and C. W. Moore. 1994. Chambers for a Memory Palace. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foulke, E. 1983. “Spatial Ability and the Limitations of Perceptual Systems.” In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, edited by H. L. Pick and L. Acredolo. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Gajaseni, J., and C. F. Jordan. 1990. “Decline of Teak Yield in Northern Thailand: Effects of Selective Logging on Forest Structure.” Biotropica 22 (2): 114–118. doi:10.2307/2388402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. 1977. “Toward A Human Architecture: A Sociologist’s View of the Profession.” Journal of Architectural Education 31 (2): 26–31. doi:10.1080/10464883.1977.10758597.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Helgren, D. M., and K. W. Butzer. 1977. “Paleosols of the Southern Cape Coast, South Africa: Implications for Laterite Definition, Genesis, and Age.” Geographical Review 67 (4): 430–445. doi:10.2307/213626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage by ASEAN Research Community (HARC). (2017). “Ban Fai Rim Ping.” Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7zAqE7A1Ps&app=desktop#
   Google Scholar
• Herssens, J., and A. Heylighen (2007). “Haptic Architecture Becomes Architectural Hap.” Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the Nordic Ergonomic Society (NES). Lÿsekil, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Herssens, J., and A. Heylighen (2012). “Haptic Design Research: A Blind Sense of Space.” Paper presented at the ARCC/EAAE 2010 International Conference on Architectural Research. Washington D.C., U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1958. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2010). “ISO 9241-210: 2010 Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction–part 210: Human-centred Design for Interactive Systems.” Standard catalogue: 13.180 ERGONOMICS. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/52075.html
   Google Scholar
• Jivén, G., and P. J. Larkham. 2003. “Sense of Place, Authenticity and Character: A Commentary.” Journal of Urban Design 8 (1): 67–81. doi:10.1080/1357480032000064773.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., and I. S. Na. 2019. “A Case Study of A Community Center Project Based on Appropriate Technology as A Community Capacity Building of Underdeveloped Country.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 18 (2): 43–48. doi:10.1080/13467581.2019.1595628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, G. A. 2010. The Hegel Dictionary. London: A & C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Mahabadi, S. M., Z. Hossein, and M. Hamid. 2014. “Participatory Design; A New Approach to Regenerate the Public Space.” International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development 4 (4): 15–22. Retrieved from: https://ijaud.srbiau.ac.ir/article_8339_47703dce2ed5f9ebcac51ce275b56d74.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1978. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Metheny, E. 1975. Moving and Knowing in Sport, Dance, Physical Education: A Collection of Speeches by Eleanor Metheny. Los Angeles: Peek Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mugerauer, R. 1994. Interpretations on Behalf of Places: Environmental Displacements and Alternative Responses. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M., and P. Thomas. 2008. “Student Participation in School Design: One School’s Approach to Student Engagement in the BSF Process.” CoDesign 4 (4): 237–251. doi:10.1080/15710880802524938.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg-schulz, C. 1980. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Norwood, B. E. 2011. “Architecture’s Historical Turn: Phenomenology and the Rise of the Postmodern by Jorge Otero-Pailos.” Harvard Design Magazine 33: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. E. 2001. “Corporeal Experience: A Haptic Way of Knowing.” Journal of Architectural Education 55 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1162/104648801753168765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 2005a. “Architecture and the Human Condition.” In Another Eyesight, Multisensory Design in Context, edited by J. Ionides and P. Howell. Ludlow: Dog Rose Trust. p. 411.
   Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 2005b. Encounters, Ed. P. MacKeith. Helsinki: Rakennustieto Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Passe, U. 2009. “Designing Sensual Spaces.” Design Principles and Practices 3 (5): 31–46. doi:10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v03i05/37756.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlides, E., and C. Cranz. 2012. “Ethnographic Methods in Support of Architectural Practice.” In Enhancing Building and Environmental Performance, edited by S. Mallory-Hill, W. Preiser, and C. Watson. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• Pikulsri, B. (2018). “Modern Thai Loft on a Two-hectare Estate (In Thai).” Homedeedee, 27 May 2018. Retrieved from h ttps:// homedeedee.c om/thai-modern-loft-บ้านไทย-สไตล์โมเดิร์น
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, S. E. 1964. Experiencing Architecture. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury, Eds. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ryhl, C. 2009. “Architecture for the Senses.” In Inclusive Buildings, Products and Services, edited by T. Vavik. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press. pp. 104–127.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. 2008. “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research.” ACM Interactions Magazine XV (6): 1–7. doi:10.1145/1409040.1409043.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “From Designing to Co-designing to Collective Dreaming.” Interactions 21 (6): 24–33. doi:10.1145/2670616.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. 1979. Fenomenologia E Relações Sociais. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
   Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. 1980. “Body-subject, Time-space Routines, and Place Ballets.” In The Human Experience of Space and Place, edited by A. Buttimer and D. Seamon. London: Croom Helm. pp. 148–165.
   Google Scholar
• Sidky, H. 2004. Perspectives on Culture: A Critical Introduction to Theory in Cultural Anthropology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sorabji, R. 1971. “Aristotle on Demarcating the Five Senses.” The Philosophical Review 80 (1): 55–79. doi:10.2307/2184311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanovic, I. L. 1998. “Phenomenological Encounters with Place: Cavtat to Square One.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 18 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, E. W. 1966.“The Forms of Spatiality”.Selected Papers of Erwin W. Straus: Phenomenological Psychology,edited byE. Eng,Trans. New York:Basic Books. pp. 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, J. F. 2011. “Poetic Observation: What Designers Make of What They.” In Design Anthropology. Object Culture in the 21st Century, edited by A. J. Clarke. Vienna & New York: Springer, pp. 16–32.
   Google Scholar
• United States of America, National Park Service. (2021). What is ethnographic research? Park ethnography program. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/ethnography/aah/aaheritage/ercb.htm
   Google Scholar
• Van der Velden, M., and C. Mörtberg. 2015. “Participatory Design and Design for Values.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, edited by J. van den Hoven, P. P. Vermaas, and I. van de Poel. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 41–66.doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_33.
   Google Scholar