The impact of aspect ratio of buildings implementing Horizontal light pipe and shading systems on daylight performance

References

• Alrubaih, M. S., M. F. M. Zain, M. A. Alghoul, N. L. N. Ibrahim, M. A. Shameri, and O. Elayeb. 2013. “Research and Development on Aspects of Daylighting Fundamentals.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 21:494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ander, G. D. 2003. Daylighting Performance and Design. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, M. 2020. “A Review on Light Transport Algorithms and Simulation Tools to Model Daylighting Inside Buildings.” Solar Energy 198 (December 2019): 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.018.
   Google Scholar
• Beltran, L. O., E. S. Lee, and S. E. Selkowitz. 1997. “Advanced Optical Daylighting Systems: Light Shelves and Light Pipes.” Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 26 (2): 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.1997.10748194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán, L. O. & B. M. Mogo. 2007. Development of Optical Light Pipes for Office Spaces. PLEA 2007 - The 24th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Singapore, 22-24 November.
   Google Scholar
• Berardi, U., and H. K. Anaraki. 2015. “Analysis of the Impacts of Light Shelves on the Useful Daylight Illuminance in Office Buildings in Toronto.” Energy Procedia 78:1793–1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.310.
   Google Scholar
• Boubekri, M. 2008. Daylighting, Architecture and Health. Architectural Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-6724-1.00025-7.
   Google Scholar
• Boubekri, M. 2014. Daylighting Design: Planning Strategies and Best Practice Solutions. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Boubekri, M., and J. Lee. 2017. “A Comparison of Four Daylighting Metrics in Assessing the Daylighting Performance of Three Shading Systems.” Journal of Green Building 12 (3): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BREEAM. Health and Wellbeing - Hea 01 Visual comfort. Accessed January 3, 2023. https://www.breeam.com/BREEAM2011SchemeDocument/Content/05_health/hea01.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Brembilla, E., N. C. Drosou, and J. Mardaljevic. 2022. Assessing Daylight Performance in Use : A Comparison Between Long-Term Daylight Measurements and Simulations 111989. Energy & Buildings. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111989.
   Google Scholar
• Canziani, R., F. Peron, and G. Rossi. 2004. “Daylight and Energy Performances of a New Type of Light Pipe.” Energy and Buildings 36 (11): 1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. W., P. Janssen, and A. Schlueter. 2018. “Multi-Objective Optimisation of Building Form, Envelope and Cooling System for Improved Building Energy Performance.” Automation in Construction 94 (July): 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., J. Liu, J. Pei, X. Cao, Q. Chen, and Y. Jiang. 2014. “Experimental and Simulation Study on the Performance of Daylighting in an Industrial Building and Its Energy Saving Potential.” Energy and Buildings 73:184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, D. A., D. Moreno, and J. Navarro. 2018. “Correlating Daylight Availability Metric with Lighting, Heating and Cooling Energy Consumptions.” Building & Environment 132 (September 2017): 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.048.
   Google Scholar
• Chirarattananon, S., S. Chedsiri, and L. Renshen. 2000. “Daylighting Through Light Pipes in the Tropics.” Solar Energy 69 (4): 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00081-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duc Hien, V., and S. Chirarattananon. 2009. “An Experimental Study of a Facade Mounted Light Pipe.” Lighting Research & Technology 41 (2): 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153508096167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, M. D., and V. W. Olgyay. 2002. Architectural Lighting, Second Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Elsiana, F., S. Nastiti N Ekasiwi, and I. Gusti Ngurah Antaryama. 2021. “Integration of Horizontal Light Pipe and Shading Systems in Office Building in the Tropics.” Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 25 (1): 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsiana, F., F. Soehartono, and L. Kristanto. 2020. “Daylight Performance of Horizontal Light Pipe with Egg-Crate Reflector in the Tropics.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 490 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/490/1/012006.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., and S. Cho. 2019. “Design Optimization of Building Geometry and Fenestration for Daylighting and Energy Performance.” Solar Energy 191 (July): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.039.
   Google Scholar
• Freewan, A. A. Y., and J. A. Al Dalala. 2020. “Assessment of Daylight Performance of Advanced Daylighting Strategies in Large University Classrooms; Case Study Classrooms at JUST.” Alexandria Engineering Journal 59 (2): 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, L., S. K. Wittkopf, and J. Louis Scartezzini. 2010. “Performance of Anidolic Daylighting Systems in Tropical Climates - Parametric Studies for Identification of Main Influencing Factors.” Solar Energy 84 (7): 1085–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galatioto, A., and M. Beccali. 2016. “Aspects and Issues of Daylighting Assessment: A Review Study.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 66:852–860. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. D., and S. Fay. 1998. Artificial Intelligence in Design’98. Media: Springer Science+Business. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4.
   Google Scholar
• G-Hansen, V. R. 2006. Innovative Daylighting Systems for Deep-Plan Commercial Buildings. Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering, Queensland University. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16709/.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, M. G., A. J. Santos, and M. Calhau. 2022. “Experimental Study on the Impact of Double Tilted Venetian Blinds on Indoor Daylight Conditions.” Building and Environment 225 (April): 109675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, G., and I. Edmonds. 2003. “Natural Illumination of Deep-plan Office Buildings: Light Pipe Strategies.” ISES Solar World Congress 2003, Göteborg, Sweden, 14–19 June 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi, A. 2014. “Daylighting and Solar Shading Performances of an Innovative Automated Reflective Louvre System.” Energy and Buildings 82:607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, C. Y. S., Y.-W. Lim, and D. Remaz Ossen. 2020. “Horizontal Light Pipe Transporter for Deep Plan High-Rise Office Daylighting in Tropical Climate.” Building & Environment 171 (December 2019): 106645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106645.
   Google Scholar
• Inanici, M. N., and F. Nur Demirbilek. 2000. “Thermal Performance Optimization of Building Aspect Ratio and South Window Size in Five Cities Having Different Climatic Characteristics of Turkey.” Building and Environment 35 (1): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00002-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiayu, L., B. Zheng, K. Bernard Bedra, L. Zhe, and X. Chen. 2022. “Effects of Residential Building Height, Density, and Floor Area Ratios on Indoor Thermal Environment in Singapore.” Journal of Environmental Management 313 (March): 114976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kibert, C. J. 2008. Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. Second Edition. ed. New Jersey: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., S. Bok Leigh, T. Kim, and S. Cho. 2015. “A Study on External Shading Devices for Reducing Cooling Loads and Improving Daylighting in Office Buildings.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 14 (3): 687–694. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. E. D., and P. Katz. 2002. Building Type Basics for Office Buildings. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Konis, K., A. Gamas, and K. Kensek. 2016. “Passive Performance and Building Form: An Optimization Framework for Early-Stage Design Support.” Solar Energy 125:161–179. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontadakis, A., A. Tsangrassoulis, and L. Doulos. 2018. “A Review of Light Shelf Designs for Daylit Environments.” Sustainability 10 (1): 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, C. M., and T. M. Chung. 2008. “Computer Simulation Study of a Horizontal Light Pipe Integrated with Laser Cut Panels in a Dense Urban Environment.” Lighting Research & Technology 40 (4): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153508094584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lartigue, B., B. Lasternas, and V. Loftness. 2014. “Multi-Objective Optimization of Building Envelope for Energy Consumption and Daylight.” Indoor and Built Environment 23 (1): 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X13480224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., M. Boubekri, and F. Liang. 2019. “Impact of Building Design Parameters on Daylighting Metrics Using an Analysis, Prediction, and Optimization Approach Based on Statistical Learning Technique.” Sustainability 11:5. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. H. W., and J. C. Lam. 2003. “An Investigation of Daylighting Performance and Energy Saving in a Daylit Corridor.” Energy and Buildings 35 (4): 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00107-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. H. W., J. C. Lam, and S. L. Wong. 2005. “Daylighting and Its Effects on Peak Load Determination.” Energy 30 (10): 1817–1831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. W., and M. H. Ahmad. 2013. “Daylighting as a Sustainable Approach for High-Rise Office in Tropics.” International Journal of Real Estate Studies 8 (1): 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. W., M. Hamdan Ahmad, and D. Remaz Ossen. 2013. “Internal Shading for Efficient Tropical Daylighting in Malaysian Contemporary High-Rise Open Plan Office.” Indoor and Built Environment 22 (6): 932–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12463024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. W., and C. Y. S. Heng. 2016. “Dynamic Internal Light Shelf for Tropical Daylighting in High-Rise Office Buildings.” Building and Environment 106:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y.-W., M. Zin Kandar, M. Hamdan Ahmad, D. Remaz Ossen, and A. Megat Abdullah. 2012. “Building Façade Design for Daylighting Quality in Typical Government Office Building.” Building and Environment 57:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, F. D., A. Sepúlveda, and T. Varjas. 2022. “Multi-Performance Optimization of Static Shading Devices for Glare, Daylight, View and Energy Consideration.” Building & Environment 217 (January): 109110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109110.
   Google Scholar
• Maltais, L. G., and L. Gosselin. 2017. “Daylighting ‘Energy and Comfort’ Performance in Office Buildings: Sensitivity Analysis, Metamodel and Pareto Front.” Journal of Building Engineering 14 (February): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Mangkuto, R. A., M. Rohmah, and A. Dian Asri. 2016. “Design Optimisation for Window Size, Orientation, and Wall Reflectance with Regard to Various Daylight Metrics and Lighting Energy Demand: A Case Study of Buildings in the Tropics.” Applied Energy 164:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangkuto, R. A., M. A. A. Siregar, and A. Handina. 2018. “Determination of Appropriate Metrics for Indicating Indoor Daylight Availability and Lighting Energy Demand Using Genetic Algorithm.” Solar Energy 170 (April 2017): 1074–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.025.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhoub, M. S. 2014. “Innovative Daylighting Systems’ Challenges: A Critical Study.” Energy and Buildings 80:394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckeen, P., and A. S. Fung. 2014. “The Effect of Building Aspect Ratio on Energy Efficiency.” Buildings 4:336–354. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4030336.
   Google Scholar
• Mcmullan, R. 2007. Environmental Science in Building. Sixth ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meel, J. V., Y. Martens, and V. R. H. Jan. 2010. Planning Office Spaces: A Practical Guide for Managers and Designers. London: Laurence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meteorological, Climatological, and Geophysical Agency of Surabaya
   Google Scholar
• Michael, A., S. Gregoriou, and S. A. Kalogirou. 2018. “Environmental Assessment of an Integrated Adaptive System for the Improvement of Indoor Visual Comfort of Existing Buildings.” Renewable Energy 115:620–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabil, A., and J. Mardaljevic. 2006. “Useful Daylight Illuminances: A Replacement for Daylight Factors.” Energy and Buildings 38 (7): 905–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negendahl, K. 2015. “Building Performance Simulation in the Early Design Stage: An Introduction to Integrated Dynamic Models.” Automation in Construction 54:39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obradovic, B., and B. Matusiak. 2021. “A Customised Method for Estimating Light Transmission Efficiency of the Horizontal Light Pipe via a Temporal Parameter with an Example Application Using Laser-Cut Panels as a Collector.” MethodsX 8. Elsevier B.V.:101339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, R., and R. Mulyadi. 2004. “Classification of Daylight and Radiation Data into Three Sky Conditions by Cloud Ratio and Sunshine Duration.” Energy and Buildings 36:660–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reffat, R. M., and R. M. Ahmad. 2020. “Determination of Optimal Energy-Efficient Integrated Daylighting Systems into Building Windows.” Solar Energy 209 (July): 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.086.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., J. Mardaljevic, and Z. Rogers. 2006. “Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design.” LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America 3 (1): 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2006.03.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., and D. A. Weissman. 2012. “The Daylit Area - Correlating Architectural Student Assessments with Current and Emerging Daylight Availability Metrics.” Building and Environment 50:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.10.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshan, M., and A. Salisu. 2016. “Assessing Anidolic Daylighting System for Efficient Daylight in Open Plan Office in the Tropics.” Journal of Building Engineering 8:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda, A., F. De Luca, M. Thalfeldt, and J. Kurnitski. 2020. “Analyzing the Fulfillment of Daylight and Overheating Requirements in Residential and Office Buildings in Estonia.” Building and Environment 180 (April): 107036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107036.
   Google Scholar
• Sev, A., and A. Özgen. 2009. “Space Efficiency in High-Rise Office Buildings.” METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 26 (2): 69–89. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2009.2.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, I., A. Chegut, D. Fink, and C. Reinhart. 2020. “The Value of Daylight in Office Spaces.” Building & Environment 168 (October 2019): 106503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106503.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, I., A. Chegut, D. Fink, and C. Reinhart. 2021. “Development of View Potential Metrics and the Financial Impact of Views on Office Rents.” Landscape and Urban Planning 215 (November): Elsevier:104193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2021.104193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbano Gutiérrez, R., J. Du, N. Ferreira, A. Ferrero, and S. Sharples. 2019. “Daylight Control and Performance in Office Buildings Using a Novel Ceramic Louvre System.” Building & Environment 151 (October 2018): 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.030.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, I. L. 2017. “A Review of Daylighting Design and Implementation in Buildings.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 74 (March): 959–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.061.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Q. Shi, M. Menenti, M. Sing Wong, W. Zhifeng, Q. Zhao, S. Abbas, and X. Yong. 2021. “Observing the Impact of Urban Morphology and Building Geometry on Thermal Environment by High Spatial Resolution Thermal Images.” Urban Climate 39 (July): 100937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100937.
   Google Scholar
• Zain-Ahmed, A., K. Sopian, Z. Zainol Abidin, and M. Y. H. Othman. 2002. “The Availability of Daylight from Tropical Skies — a Case Study of Malaysia.” Renewable Energy 25 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00209-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar