Critical risk factors of public building green retrofit projects- an empirical study in Chongqing, China

References

• Abdelgawad, M., and A. R. Fayek. 2010. “Risk Management in the Construction Industry Using Combined Fuzzy FMEA and Fuzzy AHP.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 136 (9): 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, M., P. X. Zou, R. A. Stewart, E. Bertone, O. Sahin, C. Buntine, and C. Marshall. 2019. “Government Championed Strategies to Overcome the Barriers to Public Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit Projects.” Sustainable Cities and Society 44:56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba-Rodríguez, M. D., A. Martínez-Rocamora, P. González-Vallejo, A. Ferreira-Sánchez, and M. Marrero. 2017. “Building Rehabilitation versus Demolition and New Construction: Economic and Environmental Assessment.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 66:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan, G., A. B. Gultekin, S. Kivrak, and S. Yildiz. 2020. “Built environment design-social sustainability relation in urban renewal.” Sustainable Cities and Society 60:102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, C. H., and S. H. Park. 2012. “Changes in Renovation Policies in the Era of Sustainability.” Energy and Buildings 47:485–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing Major Projects Construction Headquarters Office. 2020. A Detailed Analysis of the Case of Energy-Saving and Green Renovation of Public Buildings in Beijing. Beijing: China Building Materials Industry Press. In Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Benzar, B. E., M. Park, H. S. Lee, I. Yoon, and J. Cho. 2020. “Determining Retrofit Technologies for Building Energy Performance.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 19 (4): 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1748037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghorn, G. H., and M. M. Syal. 2016. “Risk Framework for Energy Performance Contracting Building Retrofits.” Journal of Green Building 11 (2): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.11.2.93.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo, L., S. Cheng, D. Li, E. Isaeva, and Á. Rocha. 2020. “Establishment and Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Green Building Design Based on Data Mining.” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 38 (6): 6815–6823. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-179759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braulio-Gonzalo, M., A. Jorge-Ortiz, and M. D. Bovea. 2022. “How are Indicators in Green Building Rating Systems Addressing Sustainability Dimensions and Life Cycle Frameworks in Residential Buildings?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 95:106793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, C., K. Sasidhar, and A. Madhumathi. 2022. “Energy-Efficient Retrofitting with Exterior Shading Device in Hot and Humid Climate–Case Studies from Fully Glazed Multi-Storied Office Buildings in Chennai, India.” Journal of Asian Architecture & Building Engineering 22 (4): ，2209–2223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2145208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. 2019. Case Set of Comprehensive Performance Improvement and Renovation Project of Existing Public Buildings. Bei Jing: China Architecture & Building Press. In Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., M. Zhang, and S. Zhao. 2021. “Game Analysis of the Multiagent Evolution of Existing Building Green Retrofitting from the Perspective of Green Credit.” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 5560671. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5560671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C., Y. Zhu, W. Li, and H. Zhang. 2020. “Consensus Building in Linguistic Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: A Perspective Based on Prospect Theory.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 36 (7): 2521–2546. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M., and M. Almeida. 2015. “Benefits from Energy Related Building Renovation Beyond Costs, Energy and Emissions.” Energy Procedia 78:2397–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.199.
   Google Scholar
• Galatioto, A., R. Ricciu, T. Salem, and E. Kinab. 2019. “Energy and Economic Analysis on Retrofit Actions for Italian Public Historic Buildings.” Energy 176:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., W. Zheng, J. Hong, Y. Liu, and G. Liu. 2020. “Paths and Strategies for Sustainable Urban Renewal at the Neighbourhood Level: A Framework for Decision-Making.” Sustainable Cities and Society 55:102074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari, A., V. Valentin, and S. M. Bogus. 2019. “Identification of Social Sustainability Criteria in Building Energy Retrofit Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 145 (2): 04018136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, D., and S. Kumar. 2016. “Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based TOPSIS Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making.” European Journal of Operational Research 248 (1): 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, Y. J., S. H. Ahn, and K. S. Park. 2021. “Improvement Effect of Green Remodeling and Building Value Assessment Criteria for Aging Public Buildings.” Energies 14 (4): 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamoozian, A., and D. Wu. 2020. “A Hybrid Risk Prioritization Approach in Construction Projects Using Failure Mode and Effective Analysis.” Engineering, Construction & Architectural Management 27 (9): 2661–2686. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc, K., H. Kunkcu, and A. P. Gurgun. 2023. “A Life Cycle Risk Management Framework for Green Building Project Stakeholders.” Journal of Management in Engineering 39 (4): 04023022. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojadinovic, I., J. L. Marichal, and M. Roubens. 2005. “An Axiomatic Approach to the Definition of the Entropy of a Discrete Choquet Capacity.” Information Sciences 172 (1–2): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Y., S. Papadopoulos, F. Fuerst, G. Pivo, J. Sagi, and C. E. Kontokosta. 2022. “Building Retrofit Hurdle Rates and Risk Aversion in Energy Efficiency Investments.” Applied Energy 306:118048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P., P. T. I. Lam, and W. L. Lee. 2015. “Risks in Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) Projects.” Energy and Buildings 92:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., X. Cai, G. Feng, S. Yu, Y. Zhao, and Y. Wang. 2015. “Green Retrofit Survey and Analysis of Public Institution Building in Cold Region.” Procedia Engineering 121:1510–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.09.126.
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., R. Law, H. Q. Vu, and J. Rong. 2013. “Discovering the Hotel Selection Preferences of Hong Kong Inbound Travelers Using the Choquet Integral.” Tourism Management 36:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Q. Li, Y. Liu, H. Li, and X. Pei. 2020. “Construction Safety Risk Assessment for Existing Building Renovation Project Based on Entropy-Unascertained Measure Theory.” Applied Sciences 10 (8): 2893. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082893.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., H. Chen, and X. J. Wang. 2021. “Research on Green Renovations of Existing Public Buildings Based on a Cloud Model–TOPSIS Method.” Journal of Building Engineering 34:101930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., X. Li, Y. Tan, and G. Zhang. 2020. “Building Green Retrofit in China: Policies, Barriers and Recommendations.” Energy Policy 139:111356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., B. Wang, and C. Bai. 2016. “Risk Assessment Studies on the Contract Energy Management in Energy-Saving Reconstruction of Residential Buildings Based on ANP-Grey.” Construction Technology 45 (4): 56–61. In Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., L. E. Wang, Z. Li, and Y. P. Hu. 2018. “Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA with Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 27 (1): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2018.2861719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., N. Zhang, and J. Chen. 2017. “A Behavior-Based Decision-Making Model for Energy Performance Contracting in Building Retrofit.” Energy and Buildings 156:315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marichal, J. L. 2000. “An Axiomatic Approach of the Discrete Choquet Integral as a Tool to Aggregate Interacting Criteria.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8 (6): 800–807. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.890347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marique, A. F., and B. Rossi. 2018. “Cradle-To-Grave Life-Cycle Assessment within the Built Environment: Comparison Between the Refurbishment and the Complete Reconstruction of an Office Building in Belgium.” Journal of Environmental Management 224:396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrucci, A., A. Marvuglia, E. Benetto, and U. Leopold. 2020. “A Spatio-Temporal Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Building Renovation Scenarios at the Urban Scale.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 126:109834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulić, D., Ž. Lovrinčević, and D. Keček. 2021. “Valorization of Economic Effects from the Programme of Energy Renovation of Public Buildings in Croatia.” Building Research & Information 49 (5): 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2020.1832433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. D., Q. N. H. Do, and L. Macchion. 2021. “Influence of practitioners’ Characteristics on Risk Assessment in Green Building Projects in Emerging Economies: A Case of Vietnam.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-05-2021-0436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. D., and L. Macchion. 2022. “Risk Management in Green Building: A Review of the Current State of Research and Future Directions.” Environment Development and Sustainability 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02168-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazouki, M., K. Rezaie, and A. Bozorgi-Amiri. 2021. “A Fuzzy Robust Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Building Energy Retrofit Considering Utility Function: A University Building Case Study.” Energy and Buildings 241:110933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccinini, A., M. Hajdukiewicz, and M. M. Keane. 2021. “A Novel Reduced Order Model Technology Framework to Support the Estimation of the Energy Savings in Building Retrofits.” Energy and Buildings 244:110896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranawaka, I., and H. Mallawaarachchi. 2018. “A Risk-Responsive Framework for Green Retrofit Projects in Sri Lanka.” Built Environment Project and Asset Management 8 (5): 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugeno, M. 1974. Theory of fuzzy integral and its applications. Ph. D. dissertation, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Talebiyan, H., and M. Mahsuli. 2018. “Risk-Based Prioritization of a Building Portfolio for Retrofit.” Journal of Structural Engineering 144 (1): 04017181. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. 2011. “A Multi-Criteria Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making with Choquet Integral-Based TOPSIS.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (4): 3023–3033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Y., G. Liu, Y. Zhang, C. Shuai, and G. Q. Shen. 2018. “Green Retrofit of Aged Residential Buildings in Hong Kong: A Preliminary Study.” Building and Environment 143:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, F., R. Bush, and J. Webb. 2020. “Emerging Linked Ecologies for a National Scale Retrofitting Programme: The Role of Local Authorities and Delivery Partners.” Energy Policy 137:111179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. J. 2015. “Ranking Triangle and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers Based on the Relative Preference Relation.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 39 (2): 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., X. Liu, Y. Qin, and Y. Fu. 2018. “A Risk Evaluation and Prioritization Method for FMEA with Prospect Theory and Choquet Integral.” Safety Science 110:152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., G. Xu, R. Lin, H. Wang, and J. Ren. 2019. “Energy Performance Contracting, Risk Factors, and Policy Implications: Identification and Analysis of Risks Based on the Best-Worst Network Method.” Energy 170:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., K. Hewage, H. Karunathilake, H. Feng, and R. Sadiq. 2021. “Research on Policy Strategies for Implementing Energy Retrofits in the Residential Buildings.” Journal of Building Engineering 43:103161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Q., X. Liu, and W. Wang. 2021. “An Extended Interval Type-2 Fuzzy ORESTE Method for Risk Analysis in FMEA.” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 23 (5): 1379–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01034-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Y. Liu, T. Xiahou, and T. Huang. 2021. A Novel FMEA-Based Approach to Risk Analysis of Product Design Using Extended Choquet Integral. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2021.3060029
   Google Scholar