The sounds of Japanese English: Monophthong vowels and rhythmic patterning

References

• Adank, P. M. (2003). Vowel normalization. A perceptual acoustic study of Dutch vowels. Nijmegen; Edmonton: University of Nijmegen; University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Adank, P. M., Smits, R., & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3099–3107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.55. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Buschfeld, S., & Kautzsch, A. (2017). Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non‐postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes, 36(1), 104–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiba, T., & Kajiyama, M. (1941). The vowel: Its nature and structure. Tokyo: Tokyo-Kaiseikan.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2001). Listening to a second language through the ears of a first. Interpreting, 5(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, D. (1997). The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27(1–2), 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, D. (2003). An instrumental study of the monophthong vowels of Singapore English. English World-Wide, 24(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, D. (2006). The North Wind versus a Wolf: Short texts for the description and measurement of English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 36(2), 187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, D., & Sharbawi, S. (2013). Brunei English: A new variety in a multilingual society. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Fant, G. (1966). A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform F-pattern scalings. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 1, 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, N., & Foulkes, P. (2011). Comparing vowel formant normalization methods. In International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 683–686). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 7(515–546), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Grenon, I., & White, L. (2008). Acquiring rhythm: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers of Canadian English and Japanese. In Proceedings of the 32nd Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 155–166). Boston: Boston University.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. (2010). High back vowel fronting in the north-west of England. In Proceedings of the Workshop “Sociophonetics, at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication” (pp. 29–32). Edizioni della normale. https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/high-back-vowel-fronting-in-the-north-west-of-england
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Kawase, S., Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2016). The influence of second language experience on Japanese-accented English rhythm. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016 (pp. 746–750). Boston: Boston University.
   Google Scholar
• Kisler, T., Reichel, U. D., & Schiel, F. (2017, September). Multilingual processing of speech via web services. Computer Speech & Language, 45, 326–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, M. (2009). Is acquisition of L2 phonemes difficult? Production of English stress by Japanese speakers. In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2009) (pp. 105–112). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Guion, S. G., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 487–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 606–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, E. L. (1998). Prosodic prominence in Singapore English. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Low, E. L. (2010). The acoustic reality of the Kachruvian circles: A rhythmic perspective. World Englishes, 29(3), 394–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, E. L. (2015). The NIE Spoken Corpus of English in Asia (NIESCEA). Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
   Google Scholar
• Low, E. L. (2016). Phonological patterning for English as a lingua franca in Asia: Implications for norms and practice in multilingual Asia. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(2), 309–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, E. L., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech, 43(4), 377–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markel, J. D., & Gray, A. J. (1976). Linear prediction of speech (Vol. 12). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Mochizuki-Sudo, M., & Kiritani, S. (1991). Production and perception of stress-related durational patterns in Japanese learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 19(2), 231–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, N. (2018). Language education and dynamic ecologies in world Englishes. In E. L. Low & A. Pakir (Eds.), World Englishes: Rethinking paradigms (pp. 47–63). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nihalani, P. (1999). Vowel phonology of Asian Englishes: Towards a characterization of “international English”. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Congress of Phonetic. 1 (pp. 97–100). San Francisco, CA: International Phonetic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nihalani, P. (2001). Phonology of non-native accents of English: Evidence from three concentric circles. In B. B. Kachru & E. Thumboo (Eds.), hree circles of English: Language specialists talk about the English language (pp. 67–75). Singapore: UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Nihalani, P. (2010). Globalization and international intelligibility. In M. Sazena & T. Omoniyi (Eds.), Contending with globalization in world Englishes (pp. 23–44). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nishi, K., Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., & Trent-Brown, S. A. (2008). Acoustic and perceptual similarity of Japanese and American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(1), 576–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordström, P. E. (1977). Female and infant vocal tracts simulated from male area functions. Journal of Phonetics, 5(1), 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Reetz, H., & Jongman, A. (2009). Extrinsic versus intrinsic normalization. In Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception (pp. 254–256). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. (2003). The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language, 79(2), 233–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. (2011). English around the world: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sóskuthy, M., Foulkes, P., Hughes, V., Hay, J., & Haddican, B. (2015). Word-level distributions and structural factors codetermine GOOSE fronting. In International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, S. O., & Tanaka, H. (1995). A survey of Japanese sources on the use of English in Japan. World Englishes, 14(1), 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. R. (2001). An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English (Vol. Publication of the American Dialect Society 85). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. R. (2011). Sociophonetics: An introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2007). Retrieved from NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite: http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/about_norm1.php
   Google Scholar
• Ueyama, M. (1997). The phonology and phonetics of second language intonation: The case of “Japanese English”. In Fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. Rhodes, Greece: European Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ueyama, M., & Jun, S. A. (1996). Focus realization of Japanese English and Korean English intonation. In UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics (pp. 110–125). Los Angeles: UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, D., Fabricius, A., & Kendall, T. (2010). More on vowels: Plotting and normalising. In M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (Eds.), Sociophonetics: A student’s guide (pp. 107–118). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A. W. (2014). GOOSE-fronting among Chinese Americans in New York City. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 20(2), 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, T., & Chiew, P. S. (2020). Is there conflation? An acoustic analysis of vowels in Japanese English. Asian Englishes, 22(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano, Y. (2011). English as an international language and ‘Japanese English’. In P. Seargeant (Ed.), English in Japan in the era of globalization (pp. 125– 142). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zielinski, B. (2015). The segmental/suprasegmental debate. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 397–412). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker, E., & Terhardt, E. (1980). Analytical expressions for critical‐band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68(5), 1523–1525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar