From tweets to trends: analyzing sociolinguistic variation and change using the Twitter Corpus of English in Hong Kong (TCOEHK)

References

• Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc (version 4.0.5). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. <https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software>
   Google Scholar
• Benor, S. B. (2010). Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity 1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(2), 159–183. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, K. (2000). The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 19(3), 265–285. doi:10.1111/1467-971X.00179
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calle–Martín, J. (2022). Spelling forms in competition: The case of - ise vs. - ize. English Today, 38(3), 194–204. doi:10.1017/S0266078421000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, H. M. (2022). Hong Kong English and linguistic identity of Hong Kongers. Asian Englishes, 24(1), 50–82. doi:10.1080/13488678.2021.1879535
   Google Scholar
• Danielewicz-Betz, A., & Graddol, D. (2014). Varieties of English in the urban landscapes of Hong Kong and Shenzhen: Changing English landscapes around a Chinese border. English Today, 30(3), 22–32. doi:10.1017/S0266078414000236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Fuchs, R. (2015). Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word global web-based English corpus (GloWbe). English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English, 36(1), 1–28. doi:10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
   Google Scholar
• Dominique, M., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2767. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen Edwards, Jette G. (2015). Hong Kong English: Attitudes, identity, and use. Asian Englishes, 17(3), 184–208. doi:10.1080/13488678.2015.1049840
   Google Scholar
• Hansen Edwards, Jette G. (2018). TH variation in Hong Kong English. English Language and Linguistics, 23(2), 439–468. doi:10.1017/S1360674318000035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, M., & Roettger, T. B. (2019). Bayesian regression modeling (for factorial designs): A tutorial. Preprint. PsyArXiv.doi:10.31234/osf.io/cdxv3
   Google Scholar
• Gisborne, N. (2009). Aspects of the morphosyntactic typology of Hong Kong English. English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English, 30(2), 149–169. doi:10.1075/eww.30.2.03gis
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, W. D. W. (2021). Filipino, Chinese, neither, or both? The Lannang identity and its relationship with language. Language & Communication, 77, 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2020.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, W. D. W. (2021). TweetCorp. GitHub, <https://github.com/wdwgonzales/tools> (21 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, W. D. W. (2023). Broadening horizons in the diachronic and sociolinguistic study of Philippine English with the Twitter Corpus of Philippine Englishes (TCOPE). English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English. doi:10.1075/eww.22047.gon
   Google Scholar
• Grafmiller, J., Szmrecsanyi, B., & Hinrichs, L. (2018). Restricting the restrictive relativizer. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 309–355. doi:10.1515/cllt-2016-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, J. D. (2010). MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(2). doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiramoto, M. (2015). Sentence-final adverbs in Singapore English and Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 34(4), 636–653. doi:10.1111/weng.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguín Mendoza, C. (2018). Sociolinguistic capital and Fresa identity formations on the U.S.-Mexico border. Frontera Norte, 30, 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Honnibal, M., Montani, I., & Van Landeghem, S. B. (2020). spaCy: Industrial-strength natural language processing in Python. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1212303
   Google Scholar
• Imao, Y. (2022). CasualConc. Osaka, Japan: Osaka University. <https://sites.google.com/site/casualconc/home?authuser=0>
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language (pp. 35–83). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• JustAnotherArchivist. (2022). snscrape. GitHub, <https://github.com/JustAnotherArchivist/snscrape> (21 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Kortmann, B., Lunkenheimer, K., & Ehret, K. (eds). (2020). The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English (EWAVE). Zenodo. <https://ewave-atlas.org/>
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Z. L. J. (2011). Optionality of copula in Hong Kong Cantonese and English. Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis, Hong Kong, SAR: Hong Kong Baptist University.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, K. W. (2020). Intonational variation in Hong Kong English. Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Levshina, N. (2016). When variables align: A Bayesian multinomial mixed-effects model of English permissive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 235–268. doi:10.1515/cog-2015-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundh, F. (1999). An introduction to tkinter. Pythonware, <http://www.tcltk.co.kr/files/TclTk_Introduction_To_Tkiner.pdf> (21 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Maclagan, M., Gordon, E., & Lewis, G. (1999). Women and sound change: Conservative and innovative behavior by the same speakers. Language Variation and Change, 11(1), 19–41. doi:10.1017/S0954394599111025
   Google Scholar
• McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and stan [CRC Texts in Statistical Science] (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis, CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780429029608
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, M. (2018). Introducing sociolinguistics (3rd ed.). Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780429507922
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. (2012). International corpus of English, <http://ice-corpora.net/ice/index.htm>
   Google Scholar
• Pietikäinen, S., & Kelly-Holmes, H. (2013). Multilingualism and the periphery. In S. Pietikäinen & H. Kelly-Holmes (Eds.), Multilingualism and the periphery (pp. 1–16). Oxford, UK: Oxford Univeristy Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945177.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Poon, W.-K. (2005). Two Varieties of Hong Kong English: Language Use in Computer-mediated Communication Compared to Other Forms of Written English among Hong Kong Adolescents. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Edinburgh, United Kingdom: The University of Edinburgh, <https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.865.9097&rep=rep1&type=pdf>
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, <http://www.R-project.org>
   Google Scholar
• Rinker, Tyler. (2022). sentimentR (version 2.9.0). R, <https://github.com/trinker/sentimentr>
   Google Scholar
• Rocklin, M. (2015). Dask: Parallel computation with blocked algorithms and task scheduling. Proceedings of the 14th Python in Science Conference, Austin, Texas 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Setter, J., Wong, C. S. P., & Chan, B. H.-S. (2010). Hong Kong English. [Dialects of English]. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.1515/9780748635979
   Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, M. (2022). Regression modeling for linguistic data (1st ed.). Open Science Framework. (31 January 2022). <https://osf.io/pnumg/>
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 reference manual. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. (2021). Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved Rˆ for assessing convergence of MCMC (with discussion). Bayesian Analysis, 16(2). doi:10.1214/20-BA1221
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Hale, S. A., Adelani, D., Grabowicz, P. A., Hartmann, T., Flöck, F., & Jurgens, D. (2019). Demographic inference and representative population estimates from multilingual social media data. The World Wide Web Conference, 2056–2067, doi:10.1145/3308558.3313684
   Google Scholar
• Watt, D., Llamas, C., Docherty, G., Hall, D., & Nycz, J. (2022). Language and identity on the Scottish/English border. In Language, Borders and Identity (pp. 8–26). Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.1515/9780748669783-005
   Google Scholar
• Yan, L., Béliveau, A., Besche, H., Wu, A. D., Zhang, X. … Kim, C. (2021). Bayesian mixed effects model and data visualization for understanding item response time and response order in Open online assessment. Frontiers in Education, 5, 607260. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.607260
   Google Scholar