World Trade Organization judicialization and preference convergence in EU trade policy: making the agent's life easier

References

• Agra Europe . 2001 . Global satisfaction over new round . No.1978, November 16 ,
   Google Scholar
• Alter , K . 2008 . Agents or trustees? International courts in their political context . European Journal of International Relations , 14 ( 1 ) : 33 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anania G. (2007) ‘Multilateral negotiations, regional integration processes and the CAP. What's ahead?’, Paper presented at the 51st Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Queenstown, New Zealand, 13–16 February
   Google Scholar
• Anderson , R. D. and Holmes , P. 2002 . Competition policy and the future of the multilateral trading system . Journal of International Economic Law , 5 ( 2 ) : 531 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittan , L. ‘The need for a multilateral framework of competition rules’, Speech made at the OECD Conference on Trade and Competition . 29–30 June , Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Busch , M. and Reinhardt , E. 2000 . Bargaining in the shadow of the law: early settlement in GATT/WTO disputes . Fordham International Law Journal , 24 ( 1–2 ) : 158 – 72 .
   Google Scholar
• Busch , M. and Reinhardt , E. 2003 . “ Transatlantic trade conflicts and GATT/WTO dispute settlement ” . In Transatlantic Economic Disputes: The EU the US and the WTO , Edited by: Petersmann , E.U. and Pollack , M.A. 465 – 85 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Conceição-Heldt, E.d. (2011) ‘Variation in EU member states' preferences and the Commission's discretion in the Doha Round’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(3): 403–19.
   Google Scholar
• COPA-COGECA . 2001 . COPA and COGECA working for a successful outcome to the WTO ministerial in Doha . 9 November
   Google Scholar
• COPA-COGECA . 2001a . COPA and COGECA fully behind the European Union's position at the Doha talks . 11 November
   Google Scholar
• Damro , C. 2004 . Multilateral competition policy and transatlantic compromise . European Foreign Affairs Review , 9 ( 2 ) : 269 – 87 .
   Google Scholar
• Damro , C. 2007 . EU delegation and agency in international trade negotiations: a cautionary comparison . Journal of Common Market Studies , 45 ( 4 ) : 881 – 901 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg , C. and Swinbank , A. 2008 . Curbing exceptionalism: the EU response to external challenge . The World Economy , 31 ( 5 ) : 631 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , C. 2004 . International institutions and issue linkage: building support for agricultural trade liberalization . American Political Science Review , 98 ( 1 ) : 153 – 68 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , C. 2005 . Setting the negotiation table: forum shopping and the selection of institutions for trade disputes . Working Paper, Department of Politics, Princeton University , 3 February
   Google Scholar
• Davis , C. 2007 . ‘A conflict of institutions? The WTO and EU agricultural policy’, available online at http://www.princeton.edu/~cldavis/research/index.html (accessed 12 May 2008)
   Google Scholar
• De Bièvre , D. 2006 . The EU regulatory trade agenda and the quest for WTO enforcement . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 847 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bièvre , D. and Dür , A. 2005 . Constituency interests and delegation in European and American trade policy . Comparative Political Studies , 38 ( 10 ) : 1271 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deere , C. 2005 . International trade technical assistance and capacity building . Occasional Paper, Human Development Report Office , March
   Google Scholar
• Dür , A. 2006 . Assessing the EU's role in international trade negotiations . European Political Science , 5 ( 4 ) : 362 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Dür , A. 2008 . Bringing economic interests back into the study of EU trade policy-making . British Journal of Politics and International Relations , 10 ( 1 ) : 27 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür , A. 2010 . Protection for Exporters: Power and Discrimination in Transatlantic Trade Relations, 1930–2010 , Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. and Elsig, M. (2011) ‘Principals, agents, and the European Union's foreign economic policies’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(3): 323–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dymond , W. D. and Hart , M. M. 2000 . Post-modern trade policy: reflections on the challenges to multilateral trade negotiations after Seattle . Journal of World Trade , 34 ( 3 ) : 21 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EICTA . 2005 . EICTA's position on the principles of the market access negotiations for digital technology . 9 September
   Google Scholar
• Elsig , M. 2007 . The EU's choice of regulatory venues for trade negotiations: a tale of agency power . Journal of Common Market Studies , 45 ( 4 ) : 927 – 48 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsig , M. 2010 . European Union trade policy after enlargement: larger crowds, shifting priorities and informal decision-making . Journal of European Public Policy , 17 ( 6 ) : 783 – 800 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESF . ‘Declaration of the European services industries for the third WTO Ministerial Conference towards the Millennium Round’ . 25 October .
   Google Scholar
• ESF . 1999b . ‘ESF position paper on trade and competition policy’, ESF9-41, Brussels, 5 November
   Google Scholar
• ESF . 2001 . ‘Declaration of the European services industries towards the launch of a new WTO round in Qatar’, September
   Google Scholar
• ESF . 2003 . ‘ESF calls for progress towards a multilateral agreement on trade and competition’, ESG03-31, Brussels, 20 May
   Google Scholar
• ESF . 2005 . The importance of the services negotiations in the WTO Ministerial in Hong Kong’, Letter to the prime ministers of all EU member states . 21 November
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 1999 . Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament “The EU approach to the Millennium Round” . COM (99) 331 final, 8 July ,
   Google Scholar
• Fox , E. M. 1997 . The world antitrust and market access . The American Journal of International Law , 91 ( 1 ) : 1 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox , E. M. 2003 . International antritrust and the Doha dome . Virginia Journal of International Law , 43 : 911 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein , J. , Kahler , M. , Keohane , R. O. and Slaugther , A. M. 2000 . Introduction: legalization and world politics . International Organization , 54 ( 3 ) : 385 – 9 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein , J. and Martin , L. 2000 . Legalization, trade liberalization and domestic politics: a cautionary note . International Organization , 54 ( 3 ) : 603 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein , J. L. and Steinberg , R. H. 2008 . Negotiate or litigate? Effects of WTO judicial delegation on US trade politics . Law and Contemporary Problems , 71 : 257 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Guzman , A. and Simmons , B. A. 2002 . To settle or empanel? An empirical analysis of litigation and settlement at the WTO . Journal of Legal Studies , 31 ( 1 ) : 205 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking , B. 2004 . Changing the terms of trade policy-making: from the “club” to the “multistakeholder” model . World Trade Review , 3 ( 1 ) : 3 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman , B. , Mattoo , A. and Sapir , A. 2007 . The political economy of services trade liberalization: a case for international regulatory cooperation? . Oxford Review of Economic Policy , 23 ( 3 ) : 367 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudec , R.E. 2000 . “ Broadening the scope of remedies in the WTO dispute settlement ” . In Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals , Edited by: Friedl , W. 369 – 400 . London : Cameron .
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen , D. 2001 . The limits of judicial power: trade-environment disputes in the GATT/WTO and the EU . Comparative Political Studies , 34 ( 6 ) : 622 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen , D. and Vogel , D. 2010 . Trading places: the role of the United States and the European Union in international environmental politics . Comparative Political Studies , 43 ( 4 ) : 427 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerremans , B. 2004 . What went wrong in Cancun? A principal–agent view on the EU's rationale towards the Doha development round . European Foreign Affairs Review , 9 ( 3 ) : 363 – 93 .
   Google Scholar
• Meunier , S. 2005 . Trading Voices: the European Union in International Commercial Negotiations , Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Meunier , S. 2007 . Managing globalization? The EU in international trade negotiations . Journal of Common Market Studies , 45 ( 4 ) : 905 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik , A. 1994 . Why the European Community strengthens the state: domestic politics and international institutions . Center for European Studies Working Paper Series 52 ,
   Google Scholar
• Poletti , A. 2010 . Drowning protection in the multilateral bath: WTO judicialization and European agriculture in the Doha round . British Journal of Politics and International Relations , 12 ( 4 ) : 615 – 33 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter , C. and Burney , J. 2002 . Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO: legitimate non-trade concerns or disguised protectionism? . Journal of Rural Studies , 18 ( 6 ) : 35 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Putnam , R. 1988 . Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two level games . International Organization , 42 ( 3 ) : 427 – 60 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt , E. 2001 . Adjudication without enforcement in GATT disputes . Journal of Conflict Resolution , 45 ( 2 ) : 174 – 95 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosendorff , B. P. 2005 . Stability and rigidity: politics and the design of the WTO's dispute resolution procedure . American Political Science Review , 99 ( 3 ) : 389 – 400 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer , G. 2006 . What's new in EU trade dispute settlement? Judicialization, public-private networks and the WTO legal order . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 832 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg , R. H. 2002 . In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO . International Organization , 56 ( 2 ) : 339 – 74 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg , R. H. and Josling , T. E. 2003 . When the peace ends: the vulnerability of EC and US agricultural subsidies to WTO legal challenge . Journal of International Economic Law , 6 ( 2 ) : 369 – 417 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinbank , A. 1999 . EU agriculture, Agenda 2000 and the WTO commitments . The World Economy , 22 ( 1 ) : 42 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinbank , A. 2005 . Developments in the Doha Round and WTO dispute settlement: some implications for EU agricultural policy . European Review of Agricultural Economics , 32 ( 4 ) : 551 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICE . 1999 . ‘Trade and competition: WTO framework on competition rules’, Preliminary UNICE comments, 6/30/1, 14 May
   Google Scholar
• UNICE . 2000 . ‘UNICE strategy on services negotiations’, speech by Guide Vaucleroy at the ESF Conference The GATS 2000 Negotiations, 27 November
   Google Scholar
• UNICE . 2001a . ‘New WTO round’, UNICE fact sheets, October
   Google Scholar
• UNICE . ‘Why launch a new round of multilateral trade negotiations?’, address by Baron Georges Jacobs, President of UNICE, at the Conference organised by “Confrontations” . 27 September .
   Google Scholar
• UNICE . 2003 . ‘Letter by Philippe de Buck to Commissioner Lamy on the European Commission consultations with civil society on services negotiations at the WTO’, 30 January
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoven , A. 2002 . Interest group influence on trade policy in a multilevel polity: analysing the EU position at the Doha WTO Ministerial Conference . EUI Working Papers 2002/67 ,
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoven , A. 2004 . Assuming leadership in multilateral economic institutions: the EU's development round discourse and strategy . West European Politics , 27 ( 2 ) : 256 – 83 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , J.Q. 1973 . Political Organizations , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Woll , C. 2006 . Trade policy lobbying in the European Union: who captures whom? . Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Internationales (CERI), Sciences Po Paris, MPIfG Working Paper 06/7 , October
   Google Scholar
• Woll , C. and Artigas , A. 2007 . When trade liberalization turns into regulatory reform: the impact on business-government relations in international trade politics . Regulation and Governance , 1 ( 2 ) : 121 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock , S. 2005 . “ Trade policy: from Uruguay to Doha and beyond ” . In Policy-Making in the European Union , Edited by: Wallace , H. , Wallace , W. and Pollack , M. 390 – 405 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• WTO . 2000 . EC comprehensive negotiating proposal . Committee on Agriculture, G/AG/NG/W/90 , 14 December
   Google Scholar
• WTO . 2001 . Ministerial Declaration . WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 , Doha, 20 November
   Google Scholar
• Young , A. 2007 . Trade politics ain't what it used to be: the European Union in the Doha Round . Journal of Common Market Studies , 45 ( 4 ) : 789 – 811 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young , A. and Peterson , J. 2006 . The EU and the new trade politics . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 795 – 814 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangl , B. 2008 . Judicialization matters! A comparison of dispute settlement under GATT and the WTO . International Studies Quarterly , 52 ( 4 ) : 825 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar