Measuring the formal independence of regulatory agencies

REFERENCES

• Banaian , K. , Burdekin , R. and Willett , T. 1998 . Reconsidering the principal components of central bank independence: the more the merrier? . Public Choice , 97 ( 1 ) : 1 – 12 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawn , K. 1995 . Political control versus expertise: congressional choices about administrative procedures . American Political Science Review , 89 ( 1 ) : 62 – 73 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen , J. G. and Nielsen , V. L. 2010 . Administrative capacity, structural choice and the creation of EU agencies . Journal of European Public Policy , 17 ( 2 ) : 176 – 204 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukierman , A. , Webb , S. and Neyapti , B. 1992 . Measuring the independence of central banks and its effect on policy outcomes . World Bank Economic Review , 6 ( 3 ) : 353 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards , G. and Waverman , L. 2006 . The effects of public ownership and regulatory independence on regulatory outcomes . Journal of Regulatory Economics , 29 ( 1 ) : 23 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgie , R. 1998 . Democratic accountability and central bank independence: historical and contemporary, national and European perspectives . West European Politics , 21 ( 3 ) : 53 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Elgie , R. and McMenamin , I. 2005 . Credible commitment, political uncertainty or policy complexity? Explaining variations in the independence of non-majoritarian institutions in France . British Journal of Political Science , 35 ( 3 ) : 531 – 48 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi , F. 2002 . Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: a comparative empirical analysis . Journal of European Public Policy , 9 ( 6 ) : 873 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi , F. 2005a . The formal independence of regulators: a comparison of 17 countries and 7 sectors . Swiss Political Science Review , 11 ( 4 ) : 139 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi , F. 2005b . The institutional foundations of regulatory capitalism: the diffusion of independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe . The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 598 ( 1 ) : 84 – 101 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gual , J. and Trillas , F. 2006 . Telecommunications policies: measurement and determinants . Review of Network Economics , 5 ( 2 ) : 249 – 72 .
   Google Scholar
• Hanretty , C. 2010 . Explaining the de facto independence of public broadcasters . British Journal of Political Science , 40 ( 1 ) : 75 – 89 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanretty , C. and Koop , C. 2009 . “ Compararing regulatory agencies: report on the results of a worldwide survey ” . In EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2009/63 available at: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/12877/RSCAS_2009_63.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Hayo , B. and Voigt , S. 2007 . Explaining de facto judicial independence . International Review of Law and Economics , 27 ( 3 ) : 269 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordana , J. , Levi-Faur , D. and Fernandez , X. 2009 . “ The global diffusion of regulatory agencies and the restructuring of the state ” . available at: http://law.huji.ac.il/upload/Global_Diffusion__23_December_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kydland , F. and Prescott , E. 1977 . Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans . The Journal of Political Economy , 85 ( 3 ) : 473 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti , M. 2007 . De facto independence after delegation: a fuzzy-set analysis . Regulation and Governance , 1 ( 4 ) : 271 – 94 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone , G. 1994 . The rise of the regulatory state in Europe . West European Politics , 17 ( 3 ) : 77 – 101 .
   Google Scholar
• Martin , A. , Quinn , K. and Park , J. H. 2009 . MCMCpack: Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Package R package version 1.0-7, available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MCMCpack
   Google Scholar
• Moreno , E. , Crisp , B. and Shugart , M. 2003 . “ The accountability deficit in Latin America ” . In Democratic Accountability in Latin America , Edited by: Mainwaring , S. and Welna , C. 79 – 132 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Quinn , K. 2004 . Bayesian factor analysis for mixed ordinal and continuous responses . Political Analysis , 12 ( 4 ) : 338 – 53 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju , N. , Laffitte , L. and Byrne , B. 2002 . Measurement equivalence: a comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory . Journal of Applied Psychology , 87 ( 3 ) : 517 – 29 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos , D. 2006 . ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses . Journal of Statistical Software , 17 ( 5 ) : 1 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosas , G. 2009 . Trust in elections and the institutional design of electoral authorities: evidence from Latin America . Electoral Studies , 29 ( 1 ) : 74 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima , F. 1970 . Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores . Psychometrika Monograph Supplement , 34 ( 4 ) : 100 – 114 .
   Google Scholar
• Smithey , S. and Ishiyama , J. 2000 . Judicious choices: designing courts in post-communist politics . Communist and Post-Communist Studies , 33 ( 2 ) : 163 – 82 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher , M. and Stone Sweet , A. 2002 . Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions . West European Politics , 25 ( 1 ) : 1 – 22 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonka , A. and Rittberger , B. 2009 . “ How independent are EU agencies? ” . In RECON Online Working Paper 2009/12 available at: http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0912.pdf?fileitem=3555641
   Google Scholar