The post-2013 reform of EU cohesion policy and the place-based narrative

REFERENCES

• Andor , L. 1 April 2011 . “ Shaping the future of Cohesion Policy based on an integrated approach ” . In Speech 11/233 , 1 April , Budapest : High-Level Meeting on the future of cohesion policy .
   Google Scholar
• Ahner , D. 2009 . ‘What role and aim for the European cohesion policy?’, Notre Europe Debate, Notre Europe, Brussels, 17 November
   Google Scholar
• Allen , D. 2005 . “ Cohesion and structural funds: competing pressures for reform? ” . In Policy-making in the European Union , Edited by: Wallace , H. , Wallace , W. and Pollack , M. 213 – 42 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bache , I. 2010 . Partnership as an EU policy instrument: a political history . West European Politics , 33 ( 1 ) : 58 – 74 . (doi:10.1080/01402380903354080)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. and McMaster , I. 2008 . EU cohesion policy and the role of the regions: investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member states . Environment and Planning C , 26 ( 2 ) : 398 – 427 . (doi:10.1068/c0662)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler , J. and Mendez , C. 2007 . Who governs EU cohesion policy? Deconstructing the reforms of the structural funds . JCMS , 45 ( 3 ) : 535 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Barca , F. 2009 . “ An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations ” . Brussels : Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, DG Regional Policy .
   Google Scholar
• Barca , F. and McCann , P. 2011 . “ Outcome indicators and targets: towards a performance-oriented EU cohesion policy ” . Brussels : Paper prepared for High-level Group Reflecting on Future Cohesion Policy, Revised version, June 2011, DG Regional Policy .
   Google Scholar
• Barca , F. , McCann , P. and Rodríguez-Pose , A. 2012 . The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches . Journal of Regional Science , 52 : 134 – 52 . (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer , M. 2002 . The EU “partnership principle”: still a sustainable governance device across multiple administrative arenas? . Public Administration , 80 ( 4 ) : 769 – 89 . (doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00328)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg , I. 2010 . Cohesion or confusion: a policy searching for objectives . Journal of European Integration , 32 ( 1 ) : 77 – 96 . (doi:10.1080/07036330903375115)
   Google Scholar
• Behrens , P. and Smyrl , M. 1999 . A conflict of rationalities: EU regional policy and the single market . Journal of European Public Policy , 6 ( 3 ) : 419 – 35 . (doi:10.1080/135017699343603)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland , D. 2009 . Ideas, institutions, and policy change . Journal of European Public Policy , 16 ( 5 ) : 701 – 18 . (doi:10.1080/13501760902983382)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland , D. and Cox , R. 2010 . Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S. and Radaelli, C. (2011) ‘The politics of governance architectures: creation, change and effects of the EU Lisbon Strategy’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(4): 463–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley , J. and Untiedt , G. 2012 . Future perspectives of EU cohesion policy . Working Paper, May 2012(7) , Münster: GEFRA
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen , M. 2011 . Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change . European Political Science Review , 3 ( 1 ) : 147 – 67 . (doi:10.1017/S1755773910000342)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter , C. and Smith , A. 2008 . Revitalizing public policy approaches to the EU: “territorial institutionalism”, fisheries and wine . Journal of European Public Policy , 15 ( 2 ) : 263 – 81 . (doi:10.1080/13501760701817773)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge , C. and Gibney , J. 2012 . Connecting place, policy and leadership . Policy Studies , 31 ( 4 ) : 379 – 91 . (doi:10.1080/01442871003723259)
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions . 2009 . “ Joint COTER-REGI meeting on the present and future benefits of cohesion policy ” . In Background Note, 6.10.2009 Brussels
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions (2010) Territorial Pacts: Making the Most of Europe 2020 through Partnership, Brussels: European Union Committee of the Regions, available at http://portal.cor.europa.eu/europe2020/TerritorialPacts/Documents/1003%20territorial%20pacts%20EN%2017x24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Czech Presidency . 2009 . “ Conference report ” . In Proceedings from the International conference on the Future of Cohesion Policy Prague 26–27 March
   Google Scholar
• De Michelis , N. and Monfort , P. 2008 . Some reflections concerning GDP, regional convergence and European cohesion policy . Regional Science Policy & Practice , 1 ( 1 ) : 15 – 22 . (doi:10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00004.x)
   Google Scholar
• ESPON . 2010 . New Evidence on Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Territories , Luxembourg : ESPON .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009) ‘A reform agenda for a global Europe, the EU budget review’, Draft 6.10.09, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2010a . Fifth Cohesion Report , Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010b) ‘The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future’, COM(2010) 672 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010c) ‘The EU budget review’, COM(2010)700, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010d) ‘Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’, COM(2010)2020, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011a) ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down general provisions on the ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund’, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011b) ‘Impact Assessment accompanying the Draft Regulation’, Commission Staff Working Paper, SEC(2011)1141, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011c) ‘Regional policy contributing to sustainable growth in Europe 2020’, SEC(2011)92, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2009) ‘Resolution on the financial, economic and social crisis: recommendations concerning measures and initiatives to be taken’, A7-0228/2011, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2010a) ‘Resolution on the implementation of the synergies of research and innovation earmarked Funds’, A7-0138/2010, 20 May 2010, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2010b) ‘Resolution on achieving real territorial, social and economic cohesion within the EU – a sine qua non for global competitiveness?', A7-0309/2010, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Europolitics (2010) ‘Interviews with AER, CEMR and CPMR: what the associations of the regions are saying’, 4 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. 2012 . Multi-level (territorial) governance: three criticisms . Planning Theory & Practice , 13 ( 2 ) : 197 – 211 . (doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677578)
   Google Scholar
• Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Storper, M. (2011) ‘Cohesion policy in the European Union: growth, geography, institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49(5): 1089–1111.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer , M. 1995 . The Politics of Environmental Discourse , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe , L. 1996 . Cohesion Policy and European Integration , Oxford : Clarendon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe , L. 1998 . EU Cohesion Policy and competing models of European capitalism . JCMS , 36 ( 4 ) : 457 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe , L. and Keating , M. 1994 . The politics of European Union regional policy . Journal of European Public Policy , 1 ( 3 ) : 367 – 93 . (doi:10.1080/13501769408406965)
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe , L. and Marks , G. 2001 . Multi-level governance and European integration , Lanham , MD : Rowman & Littlefield .
   Google Scholar
• Hübner , D. 2008 . “ EU regional policy in 2008: achievements, next steps and aspects of the future debate ” . Speech to staff of DG REGIO, Brussels, 3 March
   Google Scholar
• Hubner , D. Reflection paper on future cohesion policy . Paper presented at the Meeting of Ministers for Regional Policy, Mariánské Lázne, Czech Republic, 22–24 April .
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Presidency (2011) ‘Summary of the work of the Hungarian Presidency in the field of Cohesion Policy’, Presidency Summary, Budapest, available at http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/Summary_HU_PRES_160603_full_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mahon , R. and McBride , S. 2008 . The OECD and Transnational Governance , Vancouver : UBC Press .
   Google Scholar
• McCann , P. and Ortega , R. 2011 . “ Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy ” . In Economic Geography Working Paper , University of Groningen .
   Google Scholar
• Mendez , C. 2011 . The Lisbonization of EU cohesion policy: a successful case of experimentalist governance? . European Planning Studies , 19 ( 3 ) : 519 – 37 . (doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548368)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez , C. 2012 . Clouds, clocks and policy dynamics: a path-(inter)dependent analysis of EU cohesion policy . Policy & Politics , 40 ( 2 ) : 153 – 70 . (doi:10.1332/030557311X560680)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez , C. and Bachtler , J. 2011 . Administrative reform and unintended consequences: an assessment of the EU cohesion policy “audit explosion” . Journal of European Public Policy , 18 ( 5 ) : 746 – 65 . (doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.586802)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez , C. , Bachtler , J. and Wishlade , F. 2011 . Visions and Options for Cohesion Policy after 2013 , Brussels : European Parliament .
   Google Scholar
• Morth , U. 2000 . Competing frames in the European Commission – the case of the defence industry and equipment issue . Journal of European Public Policy , 7 ( 2 ) : 173 – 89 . (doi:10.1080/135017600343151)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordregio . 2009 . The Potential for Regional Policy Instruments to Contribute to the Lisbon and Gotenborg Objectives , Brussels : European Commission .
   Google Scholar
• Polverari , L. and Michie , R. 2009 . “ New partnership dynamics in a changing cohesion policy context ” . In IQ-Net Thematic Paper, 25(2) , Glasgow : EPRC, University of Strathclyde .
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik , D. 2010 . Diagnostics before prescription . The Journal of Economic Perspectives , 24 ( 3 ) : 33 – 44 . (doi:10.1257/jep.24.3.33)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe , E. 1994 . Narrative Policy Analysis , Durham , NC : Duke University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Samecki , P. 2009a . ‘European cohesion policy post-2013 in the context of an integrated global economy’ . Speech /09/450, Brussels, 8 October
   Google Scholar
• Samecki , P. 2009b . “ Orientation paper on the future of cohesion policy ” . Paper presented to the meeting of the Regional Representative Offices, Brussels, 19 December, available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/conferences/orientation_samecki/pdf/pawel_samecki_orientation_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt , V. 2002 . The Futures of European Capitalism , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt , V. and Radaelli , C. 2004 . Policy change and discourse in Europe: conceptual and methodological issues . West European Politics , 27 ( 2 ) : 183 – 210 . (doi:10.1080/0140238042000214874)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyrl , M. 1998 . When (and how) do the Commission's preferences matter? . Journal of Common Market Studies , 36 ( 1 ) : 79 – 100 . (doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00098)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper , M. 1997 . The Regional World , New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Presidency . Make use of the territorial potential! Summary of the Swedish EU Presidency conference 10–11 December in Kiruna . Presidency Conclusions, 21 December, available at http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.28553!menu/standard/file/100108%20kiruna%20summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. and Wolleb, E. (2010) ‘Ex-post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000–06 co-financed by the ERDF (Objective 1 & 2)’, Synthesis Report, DG Regional Policy, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Winnick , L. 1966 . Place Prosperity vs. People Prosperity: Welfare Considerations in the Geography of Economic Activity: Essays in Urban Land Economics , Los Angeles , CA : Real Estate Program, UCLA .
   Google Scholar