The EU's role in climate change negotiations: from leader to ‘leadiator’

REFERENCES

• Aldy, J. and Stavins, R. (2010) Post-Kyoto International Climate Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2011) ‘The democratic legitimacy of global climate governance after Copenhagen’, In J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard and D. Schlosberg (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, (pp. 669–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (2010) ‘The Copenhagen Climate Conference: a post-mortem’, American Journal of International Law 104(2): 230–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, J. (2012) ‘A new global climate treaty – can humanity deliver? Our challenge after Durban 2015’, unpublished paper, School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington
   Google Scholar
• Christoff, P. (2010) ‘Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP 15’, Environmental Politics 19(4): 637–56. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2010.489718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. (2011) ‘China at the global summit table: rule-taker, deal-wrecker or bridge-builder?’ Contemporary Politics 17(4): 447–65. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2011.619769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, J. (2010) The Copenhagen Conference: How Should the EU Respond?, Dublin: Institute of International and European Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nyheter, Dagens (2008) ‘EU:s klimatpaket får tummen ner av miljrörelsen’ , 12 December, available at http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/eus-klimatpaket-far-tummen-ner-av-miljororelsen-1.473943, accessed 30 March 2010
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, C. and Georgiev, A. (2010) Why the Transatlantic Alliance Climate Change Partnership Matters More Than Ever, Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• ENDSEurope (2011) ‘Europe comes out triumphant from Durban’ 12 December, available at http://www.endseurope.com/27781/europe-comes-out-triumphant-from-durban?referrer=bulletin&DCMP=EMC-ENDS-EUROPE-DAILY (accessed 15 December 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2011) ‘International trade in goods, European Commission’ available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/, accessed 28 June 2012
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2005) ‘American hegemony and the global environment’ International Studies Review 7(4): 585–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2005.00534.x
   Google Scholar
• Fuhr, L., Schalatek, L., Chaguta, T. and Omari, K. (2012) COP 17 in Durban: A Largely Empty Package, Brussels: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, L. and Nieman, A. (2012) ‘Challenges in EU external policymaking in the early post-Lisbon era: the UNFCCC Copenhagen negotiations’, In Cardwell, P. J. (Ed.), EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, (pp. 315–34). The Hague: T.M.C Acer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M., Gupta, J. (2000) ‘Leadership. Theory and methodology’, In Gupta, J. and Grubb, M. (Ed.), Climate Change and European Leadership: A Sustainable Role for Europe?, (pp. 15–24). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Habeeb, W. M. (1988) Power and Tactics in International Negotiations. How Weak Nations Bargain with Strong Nations, Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, F. (2011) ‘Durban talks. How Connie Hedegaard got countries to agree to on climate deal’, Guardian, , 11 December
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, J. T. (1996) The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. and Sengupta, S. (2012) ‘Emerging powers, North–South relations and global climate politics’, International Affairs 88(3): 463–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01084.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Summary for Policymakers of the Synthesis Report of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Geneva: IPCC, ,
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M., Parker, C. and Linnér, B.-O. (2012) ‘The legitimacy of leadership in international climate change negotiations’, Ambio 41, suppl. 1, 46–55. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0240-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., Parker, C., Hjerpe, M. and Linnér, B.-O. (2011) ‘Looking for leaders: perceptions of climate change leadership among climate change negotiation participants’, Global Environmental Politics 11(1): 89–107. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (1977) Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition, Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kilian, B., Elgström, O. (2010) ‘Still a green leader? The European Union's role in international climate negotiations’, Cooperation and Conflict 45(3): 255–73. doi: 10.1177/0010836710377392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, J. and Taplin, R. (2006) ‘The Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. A complement or competitor to the Kyoto Protocol’, Global Change, Peace & Security 8(3): 173–91. doi: 10.1080/14781150600960230
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. (2000) ‘What single voice? European institutions and EU–US trade negotiations’, International Organization 54(1): 103–35. doi: 10.1162/002081800551136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall, S. (2005) ‘Coherence and consistency’, In Hill, C. and Smith, M. (Ed.), International Relations and the European Union, (pp. 91–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. (2011) ‘Global climate governance after Cancun: options for EU leadership’, The International Spectator 46(1): 5–13. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2011.567900
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C. and Karlsson, C. (2010) ‘Climate change and the European Union's leadership moment: an inconvenient truth?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4): 923–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C., Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M. and Linnér, B.-O. (2012) ‘Fragmented climate change leadership. Making sense of the ambiguous COP-15 outcome’, Environmental Politics 21(2): 268–86. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.651903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, X. (2011) ‘The rise of BASIC in UN climate change negotiations’, South African Journal of International Affairs 18(3): 295–318. doi: 10.1080/10220461.2011.622945
   Google Scholar
• Rhinard, M. and Kaeding, M. (2006) ‘The international bargaining power of the European Union in “mixed” competence negotiations: the case of the 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(5): 1023–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. T. (2011) ‘Multipolarity and the new world (dis)order: US hegemonic decline and the fragmentation of the global climate regime’, Global Environmental Change 21, 776–84. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuntz, S. (2012) ‘The EU in the UN climate regime’, In J. WoutersJ. Bruyninckx, S. Basu and S. Schuntz (Ed.), The European Union and Multilateral Governance. Assessing the EU Participation in United Nations Human Rights and Environmental Fora, (pp. 191–213). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. and Elgström, O. (2012) ‘The European Union and international regimes: institutions, norms and negotiation in the pursuit of “effective multilateralism”’, In K.E. Jørgensen and K. Laatikainen (Ed.), Europe and International Institutions: Performance, Policy, Power, (pp. 297–310). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, T., Tangen, K. and Korppoo, A. (2010) The EU and the Global Climate Regime. Getting Back in the Game, Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of Foreign Affairs Briefing Paper 55.
   Google Scholar
• Tollefson, J. (2011) ‘Durban maps path to climate treaty’, Science 480, 299–300.
   Google Scholar
• Turesson, A. (2011) Förhandla om klimatet – 12 år med klimatförhandlingarna, Stockholm: Clipore.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2010) ‘Are the Copenhagen Accord pledges sufficient to limit global warming to 2 or 1.5 degree Celsius? A preliminary assessment’, The Emissions Gap Report, Nairobi: UNEP, , available at http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/emissionsgapreport/pdfs/The_EMISSIONS_GAP_REPORT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2011) ‘‘1/CP.17: Establishment of an ad hoc working group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action’, Addendum to the Report of the Conference of the Parties' 17th Session, Durban, 28 November–11 December’, , available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Schaik, L. and Schunz, S. (2012) ‘Explaining EU activism and impact in global climate politics: is the EU a norm- or interest-driven actor?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 169–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verolme, H. (2012) ‘European climate leadership Durban and beyond’, Discussion Paper, Brussels: Heinrich Böll Stiftung
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D. (2011) Global Warming Gridlock. Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, J., Bretherton, C. (2006) ‘The European Union as a protagonist to the United States on clicate Change’, International Studies Perspectives 7, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3577.2006.00225.x
   Google Scholar
• Wu, F. (2012) ‘Sino-Indian climate cooperation: implications for the international climate change regime’, Journal of Contemporary China 21(77): 827–43. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2012.684966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar