HOW THE EU HANDLES UNCERTAIN RISKS: UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE

REFERENCES

• Alemanno, A. (2007) ‘The shaping of the precautionary principle by European courts: from scientific uncertainty to legal certainty’, Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1007404 (accessed 8 August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Caduff, L. and Bernauer, T. (2006) ‘Managing risk and regulation in European food safety governance’, Review of Policy Research 23(1): 153–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00190.x
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Johannessen, M. and Lægreid, P. (2013) ‘A system under stress: the Icelandic volcano ash crisis’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 21(2): 71–81. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12005
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.H. and Béland, D. (2012) ‘Valence, policy ideas, and the rise of sustainability’, Governance, 26(2): 307–28. doi: 10.1111/gove.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. (2007) ‘Policy framing in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(4): 654–66. doi: 10.1080/13501760701314474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sadeleer, N. (2006) ‘The precautionary principle in EC health and environmental law’, European Law Journal 12(2): 139–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00313.x
   Google Scholar
• Dratwa, J. (2002) ‘Taking risks with the precautionary principle: food (and the environment) for thought at the European Commission’, Journal of Environment and Policy Planning 4(3): 197–213. doi: 10.1002/jepp.110
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C.A. (2007) ‘Up and down the pecking order, what matters and when in issue definition: the case of rbST in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(1): 39–58. doi: 10.1080/13501760601071612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckley, N. and Selin, H. (2004) ‘All talk, little action: precaution and its effects on European chemicals regulation’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(1): 78–105. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000164316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2000) ‘Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle’, 2 February, Brussels, COM(2000)1.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2007) ‘The political economy of “normative power” Europe: EU environmental leadership in international biotechnology regulation’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(4): 507–26. doi: 10.1080/13501760701314326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrow, S. (2004) ‘Using risk assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and real options to implement a precautionary principle’, Risk Analysis 24(3): 727–35. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00471.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., Jones, J. and von Schomberg, R. (eds) (2006) Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gollier, C., Jullien, B. and Treich, N. (2000) ‘Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the “precautionary principle”’, Journal of Public Economics 75(2): 229–53. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00052-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J.D. and Hsia, S. (2002) ‘Europe's precautionary principle: promise and pitfalls’, Journal of Risk Research 5(4): 371–90. doi: 10.1080/1366987021058580
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. (2009) ‘How leader states influence EU policy-making: analysing the expert strategy’, European Integration online Papers 13(25): http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-025a.htm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. and Liefferink, D. (2012) ‘Member state interest articulation in the Commission phase. Institutional pre-conditions for influencing “Brussels”’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 179–97. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.609716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Knill, C. and Mingers, S. (1996) Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and Redefinition of the State, Britain, France, and Germany. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Heselhaus, S. (2010) ‘Nanomaterials and the precautionary principle in the EU’, Journal of Consumer Policy 33(1): 91–108. doi: 10.1007/s10603-009-9123-8
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2012) ‘Differentiated integration in the European Union: many concepts, sparse theory, few data’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 292–305. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.641747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, T. and Perrings, C. (2012) ‘Precaution and proportionality in the management of global environmental change’, Global Environmental Change 22(1): 161–77. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joerges, C. and Neyer, J. (1997) ‘Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 609–25. doi: 10.1080/135017697344091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2001) ‘The precautionary principle in the European Union’, In T. O'Riordan, J. Cameron and A. Jordan (eds), Re-interpreting the Precautionary Principle, London: Cameron and May, pp. 143–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2010) ‘Globalizing European Union environmental policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(3): 335–49. doi: 10.1080/13501761003662065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapohl, S. (2003) ‘Risk regulation in the EU between interests and expertise: the case of BSE’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(2): 189–207. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000058991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2012) Differentiated Integration Explaining Variation in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., Carr, S. and Wield, D. (2005) ‘EU regulation of agri-biotechnology: precautionary links between science, expertise and policy’, Science and Public Policy 32(4): 261–76. doi: 10.3152/147154305781779452
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. (2006) ‘The so-called “moratorium” on the licensing of new genetically modified (GM) products by the European Union 1998–2004: a study in ambiguity’, Environmental Politics 15(4): 592–609. doi: 10.1080/09644010600785218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. and Andersen, M.S. (1998) ‘Strategies of the “green” member states in EU environmental policy-making’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(2): 254–70. doi: 10.1080/135017698343974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. (2004) ‘The swing of the regulatory pendulum in Europe: from precautionary principle to (regulatory) impact analysis’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28(3): 237–60. doi: 10.1023/B:RISK.0000026097.72268.8d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994) ‘The rise of the regulatory state in Europe’, West European Politics 17(3): 77–101. doi: 10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (2002) ‘The precautionary principle and its policy implications’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(1): 89–109. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Riordan, T. and Jordan, A. (1995) ‘The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental politics’, Environmental Values 4(3): 191–212. doi: 10.3197/096327195776679475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer, D. (2006) ‘EU environmental policy under pressure: chemicals policy change between antagonistic goals?’, Environmental Politics 15(1): 97–116. doi: 10.1080/09644010500418803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S. (2004) ‘EC compliance with WTO law: the interplay of law and politics’, European Journal of International Law 15(3): 555–74. doi: 10.1093/ejil/15.3.555
   Google Scholar
• Princen, S. and Rhinard, M. (2006) ‘Crashing and creeping: agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(7): 1119–32. doi: 10.1080/13501760600924233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proelss, A., and Houghton, K. (2012) ‘The EU Common Fisheries Policy in light of the precautionary principle’, Ocean & Coastal Management 70(1): 22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and Benighaus, C. (2013) ‘Perception of technological risk: insights from research and lessons for risk communication and management’, Journal of Risk Research 16(3/4): 293–313. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2012.729522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J.J. (1994) ‘EU Water Policy: uncertain agendas, shifting networks and complex coalitions’, Environmental Politics 3(4): 139–67. doi: 10.1080/09644019408414170
   Google Scholar
• Sandin, P., Peterson, M., Hansson, S.O., Rudén, C. and Juthe, A. (2002) ‘Five charges against the precautionary principle’, Journal of Risk Research 5(4): 287–99. doi: 10.1080/13669870110073729
   Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (2003) ‘Legitimacy and/or policy effectiveness? Network governance and GMO regulation in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(3): 321–38. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000085333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (2011) ‘Contested accountability claims and GMO regulation in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49(4): 895–915. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. and Mayer, S. (2000) ‘Precautionary approaches to the appraisal of risk: a case study of a genetically modified crop’, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 6(4): 296–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stirling, A., Renn, O. and van Zwanenberg, P. (2006). ‘A framework for the precautionary governance of food safety: integrating science and participation in the social appraisal of risk’, in E. Fisher, J. Jones and R. von Schomberg (eds), Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 284–315.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C.R. (2005) Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiberghien, Y. (2009) ‘Competitive governance and the quest for legitimacy in the EU: the battle over the regulation of GMOs since the mid-1990s’, Journal of European Integration 31(3): 389–407. doi: 10.1080/07036330902782246
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2013) Risk Regulation in Europe: Assessing the Application of the Precautionary Principle, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Asselt, M.B.A and Vos, E. (2006) ‘The precautionary principle and the uncertainty paradox’, Journal of Risk Research 9(4): 313–36. doi: 10.1080/13669870500175063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Asselt, M.B.A and Vos, E. (2008) ‘Wrestling with uncertain risks: EU regulation of GMOs and the uncertainty paradox’, Journal of Risk Research 11(1/2): 281–300. doi: 10.1080/13669870801990806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, S. and Liefferink, D. (2005) ‘Different countries, different strategies: “green” member states influencing EU climate policy’, In F. Wijen, K. Zoeteman and J. Pieters (eds), A Handbook of Globalisation and Environmental Policy. National Government Interventions in a Global Arena, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 519–44.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (1995). Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2003) ‘The hare and the tortoise revisited: the new politics of consumer and environmental regulation in Europe’, British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 557–80. doi: 10.1017/S0007123403000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. (2006) ‘The precautionary principle and its normative challenges’, in E. Fisher, J. Jones and R. von Schomberg (eds), Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, J. (2010) The Application of the Precautionary Principle in Practice Comparative Dimensions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar