Class struggle in the shadow of Luxembourg. The domestic impact of the European Court of Justice's case law on the regulation of working conditions

REFERENCES

• Afonso, A. (2011) ‘Employer strategies, cross-class coalitions and the free movement of labour in the enlarged European Union’, Socio-Economic Review 10: 705–30. doi: 10.1093/ser/mws008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. and Daminan, T. (1996) ‘The negotiated economy: state and civic institutions in Denmark’, Economy and Society 25(2): 255–81. doi: 10.1080/03085149600000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A. and Traxler, F. (2007) ‘Sweden’, in F. Traxler and G. Huemer (eds), Handbook of Business Interest Associations, Firm Size and Governance. A Comparative Analytical Approach, London: Routledge, pp. 299–314.
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. (2012) ‘With Luxembourg in mind … the remaking of national policies in the face of ECJ jurisprudence’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 109–26. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.632150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. (2014) ‘National responses to European Court jurisprudence’, West European Politics 37(3): 457–74. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.830464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2007) ‘Europeanization: the domestic impact of European Union politics’, in K.E. Jorgensen, M.A. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds), Handbook of European Union Politics, London: Sage, pp. 483–504.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, G., Weinkopf, C. and Worthmann, G. (2011) Die Fragilität des Tarifsystems: Einhaltung von Entgelstandards und Mindestlöhnen am Beispiel des Bauhauptgewerbes, Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Bruun, N. and Jonsson, C.-M. (2010) ‘Nordic countries. Consequences and policy perspectives in the Nordic countries as a result of important decisions of the European Court of Justice’, in A. Bücker and W. Warneck (eds), Viking–Laval–Rüffert: Consequences and Policy Perspectives, Brussels: ETUI, pp. 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, L. (2002) Justice Contained. Law and Politics in the European Union, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobler, P. (2008) ‘Legitimation und Grenzen der Rechtsfortbildung durch den EuGH’, in G.H. Roth and P. Hilpold (eds), Der EuGH und die Souveränität der Mitgliedstaaten. Eine kritische Analyse richterlicher Rechtsschöpfung auf ausgewählten Rechtsgebieten, Vienna: Linder, pp. 509–59.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2012) ‘Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): an infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments in modern democracies’, version 12/10, 15 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Eichhorst, W. (2000) Europäische Sozialpolitik zwischen nationaler Autonomie und Marktfreiheit. Die Entsendung von Arbeitnehmern in der EU, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee of Social Rights (2012) ‘Collective complaint by LO and TCO on the development in Sweden of freedom of association and right to strike to take collective action after the European Court of Justice judgment in the Laval case (case C-341/05)’.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Gingerich, D.W. (2004) ‘Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy: an empricial analysis’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/5, Cologne: MPIfG.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (2001) ‘An introduction to varieties of capitalism’, in P. Hall and D. Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. and Goetz, K.H. (2000) ‘Introduction: European integration and national political systems’, West European Politics 23(4): 1–26. doi: 10.1080/01402380008425398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpner, M. and Schäfer, A. (2012) ‘Embeddedness and regional integration: waiting for Polanyi in an Hayekian setting’, International Organization 66(3): 429–55. doi: 10.1017/S002081831200015X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICTWSS Database (2013) Amsterdam: Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Joerges, C. and Rödl, F. (2009) ‘Reflections after the judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval’, European Law Journal 15(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, C. and Traxler, F. (2007) ‘Denmark’, in F. Traxler and G. Huemer (eds), Handbook of Business Interest Associations, Firm Size and Governance. A Comparative Analytical Approach, London: Routledge, pp. 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (1999) ‘How Europe matters. Different mechanisms of Europeanization’, European Integration online Paper 3(7), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, J. (2010) ‘Posting post Laval. International and national responses’, Working Paper 2010:5, Uppsala: Centre for Labour Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. (2011) ‘Judicial policy-making: the proportionality of national control and administrative discretion’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 944–61. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.599962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. and Engels, F. (2012) The Communist Manifesto. A Modern Edition, London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Menz, G. (2010) ‘Are you being served? Europeanization and re-regulating the single market in services’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(7): 971–87. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2010.499226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paster, T. (2013) ‘Why did Austrian business oppose welfare cuts? How the organization of interests shapes business attitudes toward social partnership’, Comparative Political Studies 47(10): 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pontusson, J. and Swenson, P. (1996) ‘Labor markets, production strategies, and wage bargaining institutions: the Swedish employer offensive in comparative perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 223–50. doi: 10.1177/0010414096029002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, D. (2012) ‘Europeanization through law, compliance, and party differences – the ECJ's Rüffert judgment (C-346/06) and amendments to public procurement laws in German federal states’, Journal of European Integration 34(3): 241–60. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2011.584344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Oxford: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2010) ‘The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a 'social market economy'’, Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 211–50. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K. (2008) ‘Beyond compliance: the Europeanization of member states through negative integration and legal uncertainty’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10(3): 299–308. doi: 10.1080/13876980802231016
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. and Streeck, W. (1999) ‘The organization of business interests. studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies’, Discussion Paper 99/1, Cologne: MPIfG.
   Google Scholar
• Schulten, T. (2012) ‘Germany’, in T. Schulten, K. Alsos, P. Burgess and K. Pedersen (eds), Pay and other Social Clauses in European Public Procurement. An Overview on Regulation and Practices with a Focus on Denmark, Germany, Norway, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, Düsseldorf: European Federation of Public Service Unions, pp. 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (2008) Action in Response to the Laval Judgment. Summary, Stockholm: Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, P. (1991) ‘Bringing capital back in, or social democracy reconsidered: employer power, cross-class alliances and centralization of industrial relations in Denmark and Sweden’, World Politics 43(4): 513–44. doi: 10.2307/2010535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfson, C., Thörnqvist, C. and Sommers, J. (2010) ‘The Swedish model and the future of labour standards after Laval’, Industrial Relations Journal 41(4): 333–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2010.00572.x
   Google Scholar