Do supranational EU institutions make a difference? EU asylum law before and after ‘communitarization’

REFERENCES

• Brinkmann, G. (2004) ‘The immigration and asylum agenda’, European Law Journal 10(2): 182–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00211.x
   Google Scholar
• Court of Justice of the European Union (2011) ‘Press release no 140/11’, Luxembourg, 21 December.
   Google Scholar
• ECRE (2008) ‘Sharing responsibility for refugee protection in Europe: Dublin reconsidered’, available at http://www.ecre.org/component/downloads/downloads/105.html (accessed 31 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• El-Enany, N. and Thielemann, E. (2011) ‘The impact of EU asylum policy on national asylum regimes’, in S. Wolff, F. Goudappel and J. De Zwaan (eds), Freedom, Security and Justice after Lisbon and Stockholm, The Hague: TMC Asser, pp. 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013) ‘A common European asylum system.’ DR-03-13-003-C, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. (2000) Immigration and European Integration: Towards Fortress Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2002) ‘Justice and home affairs: faster decisions, secure rights’, CER Policy Brief, London.
   Google Scholar
• Guild, E. (2006) ‘The Europeanisation of Europe's asylum policy’, International Journal of Refugee Law 18(3–4): 630–51. doi: 10.1093/ijrl/eel018
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V. (2000) ‘European integration and migration policy: vertical policy-making as venue shopping’, Journal of Common Market Studies 38(2): 251–71. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. and Noury, A. (2007) ‘Politics, not economic interests: determinants of migration politics in the European Union’, International Migration Review 41(1): 182–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00061.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. and Sabatier, P. (eds) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. and Sabatier, P. (1994) ‘Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework’, Journal of Public Policy 14(2): 175–203. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00007431
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C. (2009) ‘Liberty versus security? EU asylum policy and the European Commission’, Journal of Contemporary European Research 5(2): 148–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C. (2010) European Internal Security: Towards Supranational Governance?, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C. and Léonard, S. (2012) ‘The development of the EU asylum policy: venue-shopping in perspective’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(9): 1396–413. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.677191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2001) ‘The Europeanization of refugee policies: normative challenge and institutional legacies’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(5): 851–74. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, A. and Parkes, R. (2007) ‘The prospects for policy-change in EU asylum policy: venue and image at the European level’, European Journal of Migration and Law 9(2): 173–205. doi: 10.1163/138836407X190424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. (2008) ‘Dynamics and countervailing pressures of visa, asylum and immigration policy treaty revision: explaining change and stagnation from the Amsterdam IGC to the IGC of 2003–04’, Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3): 559–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00791.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peers, S. (2012) ‘The revised asylum procedures directive: keeping standards low’, Statewatch Analysis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2013) ‘Holding the European Parlament responsible: policy shift in the Data Retention Directive from consulation to codecision’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(7): 972–87. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. (1998) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(1): 98–130. doi: 10.1080/13501768880000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: assessment, revisions and implications for scholars and practitioners’, in P. Sabatier and H. Jenkins-Smith (eds), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Framework, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 211–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. and Weible, C. (2007) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications’, in P. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Cambridge: Westview Press, pp. 189–222.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A. (1993) ‘Policy change over a decade or more’, in H. Jenkins-Smith and P. Sabatier (eds), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 13–41.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E. (1995) ‘Policy making and collective action: defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework’, Policy Sciences 28: 243–70. doi: 10.1007/BF01000289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. and Rittberger, B. (2003) ‘Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 858–83. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000148342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielemann, E. and Zaun, N. (2013) ‘Escaping populism – safeguarding human rights: the European Union as a venue for non-majoritarian policy-making in the area of refugee protection’, Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference at Sciences Po Bordeaux, 4–6 September.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. et al. (2012) ‘A new dataset on decision-making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements (DEU II)’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(4): 604–22. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.662028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uçarer, E.M. (2001) ‘From the sidelines to centre stage: sidekick no more? The European Commission in justice and home affairs’, European Integration On-Line Papers 5(5), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-005a.htm (accessed 2 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR (2013) ‘Moving further toward a common European asylum system’, available at http://www.unhcr.org/51b7348c9.pdf (accessed 14 August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. (2005) ‘Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: an advocacy coalition framework approach to policy networks’, Political Research Quaterly 58: 461–75. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar