Constraining or enabling? The effects of government composition on international commitments

REFERENCES

• Auerswald, D.P. (1999) ‘Inward bound: domestic institutions and military conflicts’, International Organization 53(3): 469–504. doi: 10.1162/002081899550968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, E., Gleiber, D. and Mashoba, C. (1984) ‘Evaluating conflict of interest theory: Western European cabinet coalitions, 1945–80’, British Journal of Political Research 14(1): 1–32. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400003410
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, P. (1982a) ‘Commitment’, in P. Callahan, L.P. Brady and M.G. Hermann (eds), Describing Foreign Policy Behavior, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 177–207.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, P. (1982b) ‘Event data and the study of policy’, in P. Callahan, L.P. Brady and M.G. Hermann (eds), Describing Foreign Policy Behavior, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, J. (2010) ‘Ideological fractionalization and the international conflict behavior of parliamentary democracies’, International Studies Quarterly 54(4): 965–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00622.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, G.W. and Rocke, D.M. (1995) Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• East, M. (1973) ‘Size and foreign policy behavior: a test of two models’, World Politics 25(4): 556–76. doi: 10.2307/2009952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, M.F. (2000) ‘Unpacking democracy: presidentialism, parliamentarism, and theories of democratic peace’, Security Studies 9(4): 91–126. doi: 10.1080/09636410008429414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. (1997) ‘Signaling foreign policy interests: tying hands versus sinking costs’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 68–90. doi: 10.1177/0022002797041001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S.D. and Hobolt, S.B. (2010) ‘Coalition government and electoral accountability’, Electoral Studies 29(3): 358–69. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaubatz, K.T. (1991) ‘Election cycles and war’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(2): 212–44. doi: 10.1177/0022002791035002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaubatz, K.T. (1996) ‘Democratic states and commitment in international relations’, International Organization 50(1): 109–93. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, R.H. (1999) ‘Conceptualizing the European Union as an international actor: narrowing the theoretical capability–expectations gap’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 429–34. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J.S. (1992) ‘A conflict–cooperation scale for WEIS events data’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2): 369–85. doi: 10.1177/0022002792036002007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenleer, M.L.P. and Van Schaik, L.G. (2007) ‘United we stand? The European Union's international actorness in the cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45(5): 969–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J.D. (1993) Political Opposition and Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, J.D., Everts, P.P., Fukui, H. and Stempel, J.D. (2001) ‘Foreign policy by coalition: deadlock, compromise, and anarchy’, International Studies Review 3(2): 169–216. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00237
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M., Hermann, C. and Hagan, J.D. (1991) ‘How decision units shape foreign policy behavior’, in C. Hermann (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, New York: Harper Collins, pp. 309–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997) Political Parties in the European Union, New York: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B. and Karp, J.A. (2010) ‘Voters and coalition governments’, Electoral Studies 29(3): 299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. et al. (2010) ‘Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning’, European Journal of Political Research 49(5): 687–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, V.M. and Vore, C.S. (1995) ‘Foreign policy analysis yesterday, today, and tomorrow’, Mershon International Studies Review 39(2): 209–38. doi: 10.2307/222751
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, M.J. and Gartner, S.S. (2001) ‘Time to fight: government type and conflict initiation in parliamentary systems’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(5): 547–68. doi: 10.1177/0022002701045005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, J. (1996a) ‘Influencing peace: junior partners in Israeli coalition cabinets’, Cooperation and Conflict 31(3): 243–84. doi: 10.1177/0010836796031003001
   Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, J. (1996b) ‘Power and influence in foreign policy decision making: the role of junior coalition partners in German and Israeli foreign policy’, International Studies Quarterly 40(4): 501–30. doi: 10.2307/2600889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, J. (2012) Coalition Politics and Cabinet Decision Making, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, J. and Beasley, R. (2008) ‘Taking it to the extreme : the effect of coalition cabinets on foreign policy’, Foreign Policy Analysis 4(1): 67–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. and Lowe, W. (2003) ‘An automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: a rare events evaluation design’, International Organization 57(3): 617–42. doi: 10.1017/S0020818303573064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M.J. and Budge, I. (1992) Party Policy and Government Coalitions, New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Leblang, D. and Chan, S. (2003) ‘Explaining wars fought by established democracies: do institutional constraints matter?’, Political Research Quarterly 56(4): 385–400. doi: 10.1177/106591290305600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, Z. and Russett, B. (1993) ‘Normative and structural causes of democratic peace 1946–1986’, American Journal of Political Science 87(3): 624–38. doi: 10.2307/2938740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M.G., Jaggers, K. and Gurr, T.R. (2011) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010, Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, C. (1978) World Event/Interaction Survey (WEIS) Project, 1966–1978, Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. (1994) ‘How liberalism produces democratic peace’, International Security 19(2): 87–125. doi: 10.2307/2539197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, G., London, T.R. and Regan, P.M. (2004) ‘What's stopping you? The sources of political constraints on international conflict behavior in parliamentary democracies’, International Interactions 30(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1080/725289044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G.B. and Whitten, G.D. (1993) ‘A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context’, American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414. doi: 10.2307/2111378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, B.C. and Sprecher, C. (1999) ‘Institutional constraints, political opposition, and interstate dispute escalation: evidence from parliamentary systems, 1946–89’, Journal of Peace Research 36(3): 271–87. doi: 10.1177/0022343399036003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, L. (1999) ‘Measuring party orientations toward European integration: results from an expert survey’, European Journal of Political Research 36(2): 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, D. and Tillman, E.R. (2002) ‘Public, legislative, and executive constraints on the democratic initiation of conflict’, Journal of Politics 64(3): 810–26. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubini, N. and Sachs, J. (1989) ‘Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies’, European Economic Review 33(5): 903–38. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(89)90002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russett, B. (1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J.D. (1987) ‘Reconstructing the correlates of war dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985’, International Interactions 14(2): 115–32. doi: 10.1080/03050628808434695
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1996) ‘Diversionary foreign policy in democratic systems’, International Studies Quarterly 40(1): 133–53. doi: 10.2307/2600934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M.R. and Jones, B.S. (2002) ‘Modeling multilevel data structures’, American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218–37. doi: 10.2307/3088424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M.R. and Marks, G. (2007) ‘Evaluating expert judgments’, European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 347–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, K. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomz, M. (2007) ‘Domestic audience costs in international relations: an experimental approach’, International Organization 61(4): 821–40. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1995) ‘Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism’, British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289–325. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1999) ‘Veto players and law production in democracies: an empirical analysis’, American Political Science Review 93(3): 591–608. doi: 10.2307/2585576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volden, C. and Carrubba, C. J. (2004) ‘The formation of oversized coalitions in parliamentary democracies’, American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 521–37. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vowles, J. (2010) ‘Making a difference? Public perceptions of coalition, single-party, and minority governments’, Electoral Studies 29(3): 370–80. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, P. (1992) ‘Ideological diversity and government survival in Western European parliamentary democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 25(3): 332–61. doi: 10.1177/0010414092025003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, R. and Hill, C. (2011) National and European Foreign Policies: Towards Europeanization, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar