‘Try to see it my way!’ Frame congruence between lobbyists and European Commission officials

References

• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B.L. (1998) Basic Interests. The Importance of Interest Groups in Politics and in Political Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Mahoney, C. (2008) ‘The two faces of framing – individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union’, European Union Politics 9(3): 435–49. doi: 10.1177/1465116508093492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., Braun, C., De Bruycker, I. and Marshall, D. (2014a) ‘Let's talk! On the practice and method of interviewing policy experts’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 174–87. doi: 10.1057/iga.2014.11
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., Dür, A., Marshall, D. and Wonka, A. (2014b) ‘Policy-centred sampling in interest group research: lessons from the INTEREURO project’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 160–73. doi: 10.1057/iga.2014.10
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. et al (2014c) ‘The INTEREURO project: logic and structure’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 126–40. doi: 10.1057/iga.2014.8
   Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A.S. (2012) ‘Interest groups in the media: bias and diversity over time’, European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 117–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01997.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boräng, F. et al. (2014) ‘Identifying frames: a comparison of research methods’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 188–201. doi: 10.1057/iga.2014.12
   Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. and Golder, M. (2006) ‘Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses’, Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A. (2013) ‘Issues, preferences and ties: determinants of interest groups’ preference attainment in the EU environmental policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(4): 552–70. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.726467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. (2007) ‘Policy framing in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(4): 654–66. doi: 10.1080/13501760701314474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. (2009) ‘Schattschneider in Brussels: how policy conflict reshaped the biotechnology agenda in the European Union’, West European Politics 32(6): 1118–39. doi: 10.1080/01402380903230595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I. and Beyers, J. (2015) ‘Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European news media’, Political Communication (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., Bernhagen, P. and Marshall, D. (2015) ‘Interest group success in the European Union: when (and why) does business lose?’, Comparative Political Studies, doi:10.1177/0010414014565890
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. and De Bièvre, D. (2007) ‘Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy’, Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 79–101. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X0700061X
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1998) ‘Deliberation and constitution making’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. (1993) ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häge, F.M. (2011) ‘The European Union policy-making dataset’, European Union Politics, 12(3): 455–77. doi: 10.1177/1465116511398739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2009) ‘Measuring interest group influence using quantitative text analysis’, European Union Politics 10(4): 535–49. doi: 10.1177/1465116509346782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2013) Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kollman, K. (1998) Outside Lobbying. Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (2004) ‘A neopluralist perspective on research on organized interests’, Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 164–75. doi: 10.1177/106591290405700114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T.J. (1979) The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, W.A., Jordan, G. and McLaughlin, A.M. (1994) ‘Interest groups and public policy: the insider/outsider model revisited’, Journal of Public Policy 14(1): 17–38. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00001239
   Google Scholar
• Messer, A., Berkhout, J., and Lowery, D. (2011) ‘The density of the EU interest system: a test of the ESA model’, British Journal of Political Science 41(1): 161–90. doi: 10.1017/S0007123409990329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, D. (2007) Deliberation behind Closed Doors: Transparency and Lobbying in the European Union, Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W. (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K.L., Verba, S. and Brady, H.E. (2012) The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.J. (1991) ‘From policy community to issue network: salmonella in eggs and the new politics of food’, Public Administration 69(2): 235–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00792.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S.N. (2006) ‘Good news and bad news: asymmetric responses to economic information’, Journal of Politics 68(2): 372–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrall, T.A. (2006) ‘The myth of the outside strategy: mass media news coverage of interest groups’, Political Communication 23(4): 407–20. doi: 10.1080/10584600600976989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar