The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy: perceptions of overuse and underuse of social benefits in Europe

REFERENCES

• Allison, P.D. (2001) Missing Data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. (2005) ‘De steun voor de verzorgingsstaat in de publieke opinie, 1970–2000’, available at http://www.scp.nl/dsresource?objectid=20848&type=org (accessed June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, H., Wyche, K. and Williams, W. (2001) ‘Media images of the poor’, Journal of Social Issues 57: 229–46. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clawson, R. and Trice, R. (2000) ‘Poverty as we know it: media portrayals of the poor’, Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 53–64. doi: 10.1086/316759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durr, R.H. (1993) ‘What moves policy sentiment?’, American Political Science Review 87: 158–70. doi: 10.2307/2938963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2012a) ‘Fraud and error in the benefit system: 2011/12 estimates’, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244844/fem_1112.pdf (accessed June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2012b) ‘Income related benefits: estimates of take-up in 2009-10’, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222915/tkup_full_report_0910.pdf (accessed June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Edlund, J. (1999) ‘Trust in government and welfare regimes: attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway’, European Journal of Political Research 35: 341–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund, J. (2006) ‘Trust in the capability of the welfare state and general welfare state support: Sweden 1997–2002’, Acta Sociologica 49(4): 395–417. doi: 10.1177/0001699306071681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervasti, H. (1998) ‘Civil criticism and the welfare state’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 7: 288–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1998.tb00249.x
   Google Scholar
• Ervasti, H. (2012) ‘Who hates the welfare state? Criticism of the welfare state in Europe’, in H. Ervasti, J. Goul Andersen, T. Friberg and K. Ringdal (eds), The Future of the Welfare State: Social Policy Attitudes and Social Capital in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 231–48.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, J.R. and Groh-Samberg, O. (2007) ‘To claim or not to claim: estimating non-take-up of social assistance in Germany and the role of measurement error’, SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research at DiW Berlin, No. 53/2007, Berlin: DIW Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Fridberg, T. and Ploug, N. (2000) ‘Public attitudes to unemployment in different European welfare regimes’, in D. Gallie and S. Paugam (eds) Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 334–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gelissen, J. (2000) ‘Popular support for institutionalized solidarity: a comparison between European welfare states’, International Journal of Social Welfare 9(4): 285–300. doi: 10.1111/1468-2397.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goul Andersen, J. (1999) ‘Changing labour markets, new social divisions and welfare state support’, in S. Svallfors and P. Taylor-Gooby (eds), The End of the Welfare State? Responses to State Retrenchment, London: Routledge, pp. 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, K. (2002) ‘Solidarity and the legitimacy of the welfare state: attitudes to abuse of welfare benefits in Scandinavian countries’, Florence: COST13 Working Group II meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Hernanz, V., Malherbet, F. and Pellizzari, M. (2004) ‘Take-up of Welfare Benefits in OECD Countries: A Review of the Evidence’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 17, Paris: OECD. doi: 10.1787/525815265414
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J.J. (2010) Multilevel Anlysis, Techniques and Applications, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D.M. (2005) ‘The logic of reciprocity: trust, collective action and law’, in H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyed and E. Fehr (eds), Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundation of Cooperation in Economic Life, Boston, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 339–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, O. (1997) ‘Self-interest and the common good: the impact of norms, selfishness and context in social policy opinions’, Journal of Socio-Economics 26(5): 475–94. doi: 10.1016/S1053-5357(97)90010-X
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, H. and Frick, J.R. (2000) ‘Take it or leave it: (non-) take-up behavior of social assistance in Germany’, DIW-Diskussionspapiere, No. 210, Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. (2002) ‘Unemployment and stigmatization: the dilemma of the welfare state’, in J. Goul Andersen and K. Halvorsen (eds) Unemployment and Citizenship: Marginalisation and Integration in the Nordic Countries, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. (2008) ‘The political logic of labour market reforms and popular images of target groups’, Journal of European Social Policy 18: 50–63. doi: 10.1177/0958928707084451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen, G. and De Goede, M. (1989) ‘Public opinion about unemployed people in the period 1975–1985: the case of the Netherlands’, The Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences 25: 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, R., Shildrick, T. and Furlong, A. (2014) ‘“Benefits Street” and the myth of workless communities’, Sociological Research Online 19(3): 1–6. doi: 10.5153/sro.3438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier Jaeger, M. (2006) ‘What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: self-interest or political ideology? A longitudinal approach’, Acta Sociologica 49(3): 321–38. doi: 10.1177/0001699306067718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S. and Congdon, R.T. (2002) Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roosma, F., Gelissen, J. and Van Oorschot, W. (2013) ‘The multidimensionality of welfare state attitudes: a European cross-national study’, Social Indicators Research 113(1): 235–55. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0099-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sage, D. (2012) ‘Fair conditions and fair consequences? Exploring New Labour, welfare contractualism and social attitudes’, Social Policy and Society 11: 359–73. doi: 10.1017/S1474746412000012
   Google Scholar
• Sihvo, T. and Uusitalo, H. (1995a) ‘Attitudes towards the welfare state have several dimensions’, International Journal of Social Welfare 4(4): 215–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihvo, T. and Uusitalo, H. (1995b) ‘Economic crises and support for the welfare in Finland 1975–1993’, Acta Sociologica 38: 251–62. doi: 10.1177/000169939503800303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (1991) ‘The politics of welfare policy in Sweden: structural determinants and attitudinal cleavages’, British Journal of Sociology 42(4): 609–34. doi: 10.2307/591450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (1999) ‘Political trust and attitudes towards redistribution’, European Societies 1(2): 241–68. doi: 10.1080/14616696.1999.10749933
   Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. (2002) ‘Political trust and support for the welfare state: unpacking a supposed relationship’, in B. Rothstein and S. Steinmo (eds), Restructuring the Welfare State: Political Institutions and Policy Change, New York: Palgrave, pp. 184–203.
   Google Scholar
• Svallfors, S. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1999) The End of the Welfare State? Responses to State Retrenchment, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004) ‘Open markets and welfare values. Welfare values, inequality and social change in the silver age of the welfare state’, European societies 6(1): 29–48. doi: 10.1080/1461669032000176305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (1995) Realizing Rights: A Multi-level Approach to Non-Take-Up of Means-tested Benefits, Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (2001) ‘Troublesome targeting: on the mulilevel causes of nontake-up’, in A. Ben-Arieh and J. Gal (eds), Into the Promised Land: Issues Facing the Welfare State, Westport, CT: Preager, pp. 239–58.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. and Meuleman, B. (2011) ‘Welfarism and the multidimensionality of welfare state legitimacy: evidence from the Netherlands, 2006’, International Journal of Social Welfare 21(1): 79–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar