Liberalizing trade, not exporting rules: the limits to regulatory co-ordination in the EU's ‘new generation’ preferential trade agreements

REFERENCES

• Abbott, K.W., Keohane, R.O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M. and Snidal, D. (2000) ‘The concept of legalization’ International Organization 54(3): 401–19. doi: 10.1162/002081800551271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFL-CIO et al (2014) ‘Concerning the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership’, Available at http://www.greenbusinessnetwork.org/take-policy-action/item/986-concerning-the-trans-atlantic-trade-and-investment-partnership.html (accessed 17 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ahnlid, A. (2005) ‘Setting the global trade agenda: the European Union and the launch of the Doha Round’, in O. Elgström and C. Jönsson (eds), European Union Negotiations: Processes, Networks and Institutions, London: Routledge, pp. 130–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, D. and Newman, A.L. (2010) ‘Governing lipitor and lipstick: capacity, sequencing, and power in international pharmaceutical and cosmetics regulation’, Review of International Political Economy 17(4): 665–95. doi: 10.1080/09692291003723706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, R.L. (2013) Globalization, Trade and Economic Development: The CARIFORUM-EU Economic Partnership Agreement, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, A. (2012) ‘The Brussels effect’, Northwestern University Law Review 107(1): 1–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges (2014a) ‘EU–US trade talks advance, amid charged election climate,’ Bridges 18(19), 28 May, available at http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges-africa/news/eu-us-trade-talks-advance-amid-charged-election-climate (accessed May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bridges (2014b) ‘TTIP negotiators advance technical work as EU begins leadership transitions,’ Bridges 18(27), 24 July, available at http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/ttip-negotiators-advance-technical-work-as-eu-begins-leadership (accessed May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. and Mattli, W. (2011) The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canada (2013) ‘Technical summary of final negotiated outcomes: Canada–European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement: agreement-in-principle’, available at http://www.actionplan.gc.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/ceta-technicalsummary.pdf (accessed 23 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Commission (1996) ‘The Global Challenge of International Trade: A Market Access Strategy for the European Union,’ COM(96) 53 final, 14 February.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2001) ‘Implementing policy for external trade in the fields of standards and conformity assessment: a tool box of instruments’, SEC(2001) 1570, 28 September, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2006) ‘Global Europe: competing in the world’, COM(2006) 567 final, 4 October, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2013a) ‘Trade, growth and jobs: contribution from the Commission to the February 2013 European Council Debate on trade, growth and jobs’, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2013b) ‘Initial position paper: anti-trust & mergers, government influence and subsidies’, 19 June, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2013c) ‘Annex I: initial position paper: motor vehicles in TTIP’, 20 June, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2013d) ‘Annex II: initial position paper: chemicals in TTIP’, 20 June, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2013e) ‘EU initial position paper on SPS matters for the TTIP negotiations’, 20 June, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2013f) ‘EU initial position paper on trade and sustainable development’, 20 June, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2014) ‘Regulatory co-operation on financial regulation in TTIP: text to be circulated to the US during TTIP negotiations on 10–14 March 2014’, 5 March, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, available at http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/attachments/regulatory_coop_fs_-_ec_prop_march_2014-2_0.pdf, (accessed 18 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• De Gucht, K. (2010) ‘Speaking points: future trade policy’, European Parliament Committee on International Trade, 22 June.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D.W. (2007) All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ETUC (2006) ‘European social model’, available at http://www.etuc.org/european-social-model, (accessed 15 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fontanella-Khan, J. (2013) ‘Data protection ruled out of EU-US trade talks’, Financial Times, 4 November.
   Google Scholar
• García, M. (2013) ‘From idealism to realism? EU Preferential Trade Agreement Policy’, Journal of Contemporary European Research 9(4): 521–41.
   Google Scholar
• Global Competition Review (2013) Rating Enforcement 2013, London: Law Business Research.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, G. (2012) ‘The Influence of European data privacy standards outside Europe: implications for globalization of Convention 108’, International Data Privacy Law 2(2): 68–92. doi: 10.1093/idpl/ips006
   Google Scholar
• Groen, L., Niemann, A. and Oberthür, S. (2012) ‘The EU as a global leader? The Copenhagen and Cancun UN climate change negotiations’, Journal of Contemporary European Research 8(2): 173–91.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, H., Mavroidis, P.C. and Sapir, A. (2009) Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements, (Bruegel Blueprint Series, volume VII), Brussels: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. and Vogel, D. (2010) ‘Trading places: the role of the United States and the European Union in international environmental politics’, Comparative Political Studies 43(4): 427–56. doi: 10.1177/0010414009355265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2010) ‘Global regulation’, in R. Baldwin, M. Cave and D. Lodge (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 406–33.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S.D. (1991) ‘Global communications and national power: life on the Pareto frontier’, World Politics 43(3): 336–66. doi: 10.2307/2010398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, M.L. (2008) ‘The regulatory state goes global: EU participation in international food standard-setting by the Codex Alimentarius Commission’, Paper presented at the GARNET conference on ‘The European Union in International Affairs,’ Institute for European Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, 24–26 April.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. (2005) Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. and Nicolaïdis, K. (2006) ‘The European Union as a conflicted trade power’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 906–25. doi: 10.1080/13501760600838623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, P. and Falkner, G. (2014) ‘The EU as a policy exporter? The conceptual framework’, in G. Falkner and P. Müller (eds), EU Policies in a Global Perspective: Shaping or Taking International Regimes? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P., Kudrna, Z. and Falkner, G. (2014) ‘EU–global interactions: policy export, import, promotion and protection’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(8): 1102–19. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.914237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A. (2008) Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A.L. and Posner, E. (2015) ‘Putting the EU in its place: influence strategies and the global regulatory context’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1046901.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. (2000) ‘Regulatory cooperation and managed mutual recognition: elements of a strategic model’, in G.A. Bermann, M. Herdegen and P.L. Lindseth (eds), Transatlantic Regulatory Co-operation: Legal Problems and Political Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 571–600.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2013) International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing Global Challenges, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Piermartini, R. and Budetta, M. (2009) ‘A mapping of regional rules on technical barriers to trade,’ in A. Estevadeordal, K. Suominen and R. Teh (eds), Regional Rules in the Global Trading System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–315.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (2011) ‘Transnational policy paradigm change and conflict in the harmonization of vehicle safety and accounting standards’, in G. Skogstad (ed.), Policy Paradigms: Transnationalism and Domestic Politics, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 64–90.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, E. (2009) ‘Making rules for global finance: transatlantic regulatory cooperation at the turn of the millennium’, International Organization 63(4): 665–99. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309990130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postnikov, E. and Bastiaens, I. (2014) ‘Does dialogue work? The effectiveness of labor standards in EU preferential trade agreements’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(6): 923–40. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.910869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaglia, L. (2013) ‘The European Union, the USA and international standard setting by regulatory fora in finance’, New Political Economy, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796449 (accessed 13 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Quaglia, L. (2014) ‘The European Union, the USA and international standard setting by regulatory fora in finance,’ New Political Economy 19(3): 427–44. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2013.796449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2015) ‘Enlargement: constituent policy and tool for external governance’, in H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack and A.R. Young (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 7th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra Club (2013) ‘The Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement: what is at stake for communities and the environment’, Washington, DC: Sierra Club.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A.L. (2011) ‘TBT and SPS measures in practice’, J.-P. Chauffour and J.-C. Maur (eds), Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 217–34.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (2014) ‘Why the European Social Model is still relevant’, 19 March, available at http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/comment-analysis/WCMS_238253/lang--en/index.htm (accessed 15 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2012) The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, S. (2007) ‘European Union policy towards free trade agreements,’ ECIPE Working Paper 3/2007, Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (2011) World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence, Geneva: World Trade Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (2012) World Trade Report 2012: Trade and Public Policies: A Closer Look at Non-Tariff Measures in the 21st Century, Geneva: World Trade Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.R. (2002) Extending European Cooperation: The European Union and the ‘New’ International Trade Agenda, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.R. (2007) ‘Negotiating with diminished expectations: the European Union and the Doha development agenda’, in D. Lee and R. Wilkinson (eds), The WTO after Hong Kong: Progress in, and Prospects for, the Doha Development Agenda, London: Routledge, pp. 119–36.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.R. (2015) ‘The European Union as a global regulator? Context and comparison’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1046902.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.R. and Peterson, J. (2006) ‘The EU and the new trade politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 795–814. doi: 10.1080/13501760600837104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A.R. and Peterson, J. (2014) Parochial Global Europe: 21st Century Trade Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. (2008) ‘Europe as a global actor: empire by example?’ International Affairs 84(3): 471–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar