The European Commission's ability to deal with wicked problems: an in-depth case study of the governance of food security

REFERENCES

• Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) ‘Collaborative governance in theory and practice’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 543–71. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. and Knill, C. (2007) Management Reforms in International Organizations, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (2009) Agendas and instability in American politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. (1988) ‘Strategic planning: big wins and small wins’, Public Money & Management 8(3): 11–15. doi: 10.1080/09540968809387483
   Google Scholar
• Candel, J.J.L. (2014) ‘Food security governance: a systematic literature review’, Food Security 6(4): 585–601. doi: 10.1007/s12571-014-0364-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, J.J.L., Breeman, G.E., Stiller, S.J. and Termeer, C.J.A.M. (2014) ‘Disentangling the consensus frame of food security: the case of the EU Common Agricultural Policy reform debate’, Food Policy 44: 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D.W. et al. (2006) ‘Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world’, Ecology and society 11(2): http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chester, L. (2010) ‘Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature’, Energy Policy 38(2): 887–95. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2007) ‘The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform’, Public Administration Review 67(6): 1059–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cini, M. (2007) From Integration to Integrity: Administrative Ethics and Reform in the European Commission, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, L. (1993) ‘Calling the tune without paying the piper? Social policy regulation: the role of the Commission in European Community social policy’, Policy & Politics 21(2): 135–46. doi: 10.1332/030557393782453899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, L. (1994) ‘The European Commission as a multi-organization: social policy and IT policy in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 1(2): 195–217.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. (2005) ‘Institutional implications of interactive governance: insights from Dutch practice’, Governance 18(1): 111–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellinas, A. and Suleiman, E. (2008) ‘Reforming the Commission: between modernization and bureaucratization’, 15(5): 708–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinas, A.A. and Suleiman, E. (2012) The European Commission and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Europe's Custodians, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) ‘Memo of the Commission on indirect land use change (ILUC)’, MEMO/12/787, 17 October, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-787_en.htm (accessed June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. (2011) The EU's Decision Traps: Comparing Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (1996) ‘Rome declaration on world food security’, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w3613e/w3613e00.HTM (accessed February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norberg, J. (2005) ‘Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2007) ‘Some new rules of sociological method’, in G. Calhoun, J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff and I. Virk (eds), Contemporary Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 223–30.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, W. (2012) ‘Economic patriotism in European agriculture’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(3): 420–34. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.640797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M. (2011) ‘Organizing exits from the joint-decision trap?’, in G. Falkner (ed.), The EU's decision traps: comparing policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2010) ‘The agenda set by the EU Commission: the result of balanced or biased aggregation of positions?’ ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series No. 21/2010. London: LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B.W. (2008) ‘Wicked problems in public policy’, Public Policy 3(2): 101–18.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B.W. and Alford, J. (2013) ‘Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management’, Administration & Society, doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C.M. and Grin, J. (2007) ‘Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9(3–4): 333–50. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2001) The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2012) ‘Images of Europe: how Commission officials conceive their institution's role’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 87–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Keating, M. (1994) ‘The politics of European union regional policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 1(3): 367–93. doi: 10.1080/13501769408406965
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2003) ‘Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance’, The American Political Science Review 97(2): 233–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2010) The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering and Participation, Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C. and Eden, C. (2000) ‘The challenge of collaborative governance’, Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 2(3): 337–58. doi: 10.1080/14616670050123260
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. and Berkhout, F. (2010) Climate Change Policy in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Schout, A. (2006) The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. and Dimitrakopoulos, D.G. (2007) ‘The European Commission and the future of Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(8): 1249–70. doi: 10.1080/13501760701656445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., et al. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. and Klijn, E.-H. (2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. (1997) ‘From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(3): 422–38. doi: 10.1080/13501769780000081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, L. (1996) ‘Building capacities for integration: the future role of the Commission’, Paper presented at the ‘Maastricht in Maastricht, the Treaty Revisited Schuman Seminar’, Maastricht, 13 May’.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, L. (2000) ‘Reforming the Commission: will organizational efficiency produce effective governance?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 38(5): 817–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G. and Wright, V. (2001) ‘The national coordination of European policy making’, in J.J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy Making. London: Routledge, pp. 158–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (1997) ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community’, International Organization 51(1): 99–134. doi: 10.1162/002081897550311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S. (2011) ‘Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 927–43. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.599960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973) ‘Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sciences 4(2): 155–69. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (1988) ‘The joint-decision trap: lessons from German federalism and European integration’, Public Administration 66(3): 239–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame reflection. Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schout, A. and Jordan, A. (2005) ‘Coordinated European governance: self-organizing or centrally steered?’, Public Administration 83(1): 201–20. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R. (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. and Edwards, G. (2006) The European Commission, London: John Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. and Stevens, H. (2001) Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C.J.A.M., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G. and Stiller, S.J. (2013) ‘Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems’, Administration & Society, doi: 10.1177/0095399712469195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C.J.A.M. and Dewulf, A.R.P.J. (2014) ‘Scale-sensitivity as a governance capability: observing, acting and enabling’, in F. Padt, P. Opdam, N. Polman and C.J.A.M. Termeer (eds), Scale-Sensitive Governance of the Environment. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C.J.A.M., Dewulf, A.R.P.J. and Van Lieshout, M. (2010) ‘Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance’, Ecology and Society 15(4): 29.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C.J.A.M., et al. (2011) ‘The regional governance of climate adaptation: a framework for developing legitimate, effective, and resilient governance arrangements’, Climate Law 2(2): 159–79.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C.J.A.M. and van den Brink, M.A. (2012) ‘Organizational conditions for dealing with the unknown unknown’, Public Management Review 15(1): 43–62. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.664014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Bouckaert, G. and Peters, B.G. (2007) ‘Janus-faced reorganization: specialization and coordination in four OECD countries in the period 1980–2005’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3): 325–48. doi: 10.1177/0020852307081144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E.P. and Khademian, A.M. (2008) ‘Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings’, Public Administration Review 68(2): 334–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. (1984) ‘Small wins: redefining the scale of social problems’, American Psychologist 39(1): 40–9. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.1.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendon, B. (1998) ‘The Commission as image-venue entrepreneur in EU social policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(2): 339–53. doi: 10.1080/135017698344027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2000) Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar