Non-state actors and framing processes in EU foreign policy: the case of EU–Israel relations

REFERENCES

• Bardwell, L.V. (1991) ‘Problem-framing: a perspective on environmental problem-solving’, Environmental Management 15(5): 603–12. doi: 10.1007/BF02589620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. and Pedersen, R.B. (2013) Process-Tracing Methods, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D. and Cox, R.H. (eds) (2011) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand-Sanz, A. (2010) ‘The role of the European Union in the resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian issue: towards an engagement based on respect for international law and human rights’, PhD dissertation, School of Law, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. (2004) ‘Voice and access: political practices of European interest associations’, European Union Politics 5(2): 211–40. doi: 10.1177/1465116504042442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F. (2007) European Foreign Policy Making towards the Mediterranean, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F. (2014) ‘Information exchanges, diplomatic networks and the construction of European knowledge in EU foreign policy’, Cooperation and Conflict 49(2): 239–59. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2002) ‘Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(3): 365–90. doi: 10.1080/13501760210138796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, D. (1999) ‘Interests or ideas? An overview of ideational concepts in public policy research’, in D. Braun and A. Busch (eds), Public Policy and Political Ideas, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A.W. (2013) ‘Trading information for access: informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(1): 39–58. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.693411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2012) ‘Council conclusions on the Middle East Peace Process – 3209th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting’, 10 December, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Daase, C. and Kessler, O. (2007) ‘Knowns and unknowns in the ‘War on Terror’: uncertainty and the political construction of danger’, Security Dialogue 38(4): 411–434. doi: 10.1177/0967010607084994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. (2011) Policy Framing in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Da Conceição-Heldt, E. and Meunier, S. (2014) ‘Speaking with a single voice: internal cohesiveness and external effectiveness of the EU in global governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(7): 961–79. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.913219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keyser, V. (2012) ‘Working document. Additional protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an EC-Israel Association on an EC-Israel Agreement on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of industrial products (ACAA)’, 19 January, Brussels: Committee of Foreign Affairs, European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Dembinski, M. (2009) ‘NGOs and security. The case of the European Union’, in J. Joachim and B. Locher (eds), Transnationalism in the UN and the EU. A Comparative Study, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 154–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dery, D. (2000) ‘Agenda setting and problem definition’, Policy Studies 21(1): 37–47. doi: 10.1080/014428700114008
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. (2013) ‘Normative power as hegemony’, Cooperation and Conflict 48(2): 194–210. doi: 10.1177/0010836713485387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993) ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (2003) ‘Cascading activation: contesting the White House's frame after 9/11’, Political Communication 20(4): 415–32. doi: 10.1080/10584600390244176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G.P. (1991) ‘Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures’, Organization Science 2(1): 88–115. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joachim, J. (2003) ‘Framing issues and seizing opportunities: the UN, NGOs, and women's rights’, International Studies Quarterly 47: 247–74. doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.4702005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joachim, J. and Dembinski, M. (2011) ‘A contradiction in terms? NGOs, democracy, and European foreign and security policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(8): 1151–68. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.615204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists beyond Borders : Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J.W. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2nd ed.), New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2013) Lobbying in the European Union Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmer, D. (2012) ‘The law of belligerent occupation in the Supreme Court of Israel’, International Review of the Red Cross 94(885): 207–36. doi: 10.1017/S1816383112000446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels versus the Beltway. Advocacy in the United States and the European Union, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (1997) ‘Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation’, American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 738–70. doi: 10.2307/2111674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolov, K.Y. (2014) ‘Ashton's second hat: the EU Funding Guidelines on Israel as a post-Lisbon instrument of European foreign policy making’, Diplomacy 11: 168–88.
   Google Scholar
• Paasivirta, E. (1999) ‘EU trading with Israel and Palestine: parallel legal frameworks and triangular issues’, European Foreign Affairs Review 4(3): 305–26.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W.H. (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The Semisovereign People : A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Seeberg, P. (2009) ‘The EU as a realist actor in normative clothes: EU democracy promotion in Lebanon and the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Democratization 16(1): 81–99. doi: 10.1080/13510340802575858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell, S.K., and Prakash, A. (2004) ‘Using ideas strategically: the contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights’, International Studies Quarterly 48(1): 143–75. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A. (2004) ‘Framing processes, ideology, and discursive field’, in D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule and H. Kriesi (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 380–412.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A. and Benford, R.D. (1992) ‘Master frames and cycles of protest’, in C. McClurg Mueller and A.D. Morris (eds), Frontiers in Social Movements Theory, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 133–55.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R. D. (1986) ‘Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation’, American Sociological Review 51: 464–81. doi: 10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. (2005) The Widening Gap between Rhetoric and Reality in EU Policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (No. 271). Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. (2010) ‘The conflict and EU–Israel relations’, in E. Bulut Aymat (ed.), European Involvement in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, pp. 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.C. (ed.) (2011) Making EU foreign Policy. National Preferences, European Norms and Common Policies, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.C. (2012) ‘Still punching below its weight? Coherence and effectiveness in European Union foreign policy’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50(3): 457–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voltolini, B. (2016) Lobbying in EU Foreign Policy-making. The Case of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict, Abingdon: Routledge, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar