Good Europeans? How European identity and costs interact to explain politician attitudes towards compliance with European Union law

References

• Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (2005) ‘The influence of attitudes on behavior’, in D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson and M.P. Zanna (eds), The Handbook of Attitudes 173, New York: Psychology Press, pp. 173–222.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., Brewer, M.B. and Carlsmith, J.M. (1985) ‘Experimentation in social psychology’, in L. Gardner and E. Aronson (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., New York: Random House, pp. 441–86.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2005) ‘Why governments comply: an integrative compliance model that bridges the gap between instrumental and normative models of compliance’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(1): 113–42. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000311934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P.M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social life, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boerzel T.A., Hofman T., Panke, D. and Sprungk C. (2010) ‘Obstinate and inefficient: why member states do not comply with European Law?’, Comparative Political Studies 43(11): 1363–90. doi: 10.1177/0010414010376910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerzel, T.A., Hofmann, T. and Panke. D. (2012) ‘Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(4): 454–71. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.607338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chayes, A. and Chayes, A.H. (1995) The New Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J.T. (2001) ‘Why comply: social learning and European identity change’, International Organization 55(3): 553–88. doi: 10.1162/00208180152507551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J.T. (2005) ‘International institutions and socialization in Europe: introduction and framework’, International Organization 59(4): 801–26. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J.T. and Katzenstein, P.J. (2009) European Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciavarini A.G. (2000) ‘The slow march of European legislation: the implementation of directives’, in K. Neunreither and A. Wiener (eds), European Integration after Amsterdam, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, E. (1980) ‘The function of parliament in the Danish political system: results of recent research’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 5(1): 101–21. doi: 10.2307/439444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K.W. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulos, D.G. (2001) ‘The transposition of European Union Law: post–decisional politics and institutional autonomy’, European Law Journal 7(4): 442–58. doi: 10.1111/1468-0386.00137
   Google Scholar
• Dionne, K.Y. (2010) ‘The role of executive time horizons in state response to AIDS in Africa’, Comparative Political Studies 44(1): 55–77. doi: 10.1177/0010414010381074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, G.W., Rocke, D.M. and Barsoom, P.N. (1996) ‘Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation?’, International Organization 50(3): 379–406. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300033427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J.N. and Kam, C. (2011) ‘Students as experimental participants: a defense of the “narrow data base”’, in J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski, and A. Lupia (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–95.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life, New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (1999) ‘Transcending intergovernmentalism? Identity and role perceptions of national officials in EU decision-making’, Journal of European Public Policy 6(3):456–74. doi: 10.1080/135017699343621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. Hartlapp, M. and Treib, O. (2007) ‘World of compliance: why leading approaches to European Union implementation are only sometimes-true theories?’, European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 395–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00703.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S. (2005) Complying with Europe? The Impact of EU Minimum Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, T.D. (1990) The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith. J.L. and Posner, E.A. (2005) The Limits of International Law, New York Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950–57, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E.M., LeVeck, B.L., Victor, D.G., and Fowler, J.H. (2014) ‘Decision makers’ preferences for international legal cooperation’, International Organization 68(4): 845–76 doi: 10.1017/S002081831400023X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Kerwer, D. Knill, C., Lehmkuhl D., Teutsch, M. and Douillet A.C. (2001) ‘Differential Europe: new opportunities and restrictions for policymaking in the member states’, in A. Héritier (ed.), Differential Europe: European Union's Impact on National Policy-Making, Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, R.K. and Shannon, V.P. (2001) ‘Defending international norms: the role of obligation, material interest, and perception in decision making’, International Organization 5(3): 621–54. doi: 10.1162/00208180152507579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, R.K., Tetlock, P.E. and Visser, P.S. (1999) ‘Mass public decisions to go to war: a cognitive-interactionist framework’, American Political Science Review 93(3): 553–73. doi: 10.2307/2585574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, R.K., Isernia, P. and Segatti, P. (2009) ‘Attachment to the nation and international relations: dimensions of identity and their relationship to war and peace’, Political Psychology 30(5): 721–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00723.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hille, P. and Knill, C. (2006) ‘“It's the bureaucracy, stupid": the implementation of the acquis communautaire in EU candidate countries, 1999–2003’, European Union Politics 7(4): 531–52. doi: 10.1177/1465116506069442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2003) ‘Europe divided? Elites vs public opinion on European integration’, European Union Politics 4(3): 281–304. doi: 10.1177/14651165030043002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2004) ‘Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration?’, PSOnline, http://www.apsanet.org (July), pp. 1–5 (accessed 1 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kaeding, M. (2006) ‘Determinants of transposition delay in the European Union’, Journal of Public Policy 26(2): 229–53. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X06000547
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H.C. and Hamilton, L.V. (1989) Crimes of Obedience, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. and Rittberger, B. (eds) (2007) Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A.W. (1975) ‘The human subject in the psychology experiment: fact and artifact’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, pp. 101–47.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J.S. and Freese, J. (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. and Olsen, J. (1998) ‘The institutional dynamics of international political orders’, International Organization 52(4): 943–70. doi: 10.1162/002081898550699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E. (2005) ‘EU compliance: still a black hole?’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(6): 1103–20. doi: 10.1080/13501760500270869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbaye, H.D.A. (2001) ‘Why national states comply with supranational law: explaining implementation infringements in the European Union, 1972–1993’, European Union Politics 2(3): 259–81. doi: 10.1177/1465116501002003001
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. (2002) ‘Experimental methodology in Political Science’, Political Analysis 10(4): 325–42. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.325
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. (2011) ‘Internal and external validity’, in .N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski, and A. Lupia (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. and Shoda, Y. (1995) ‘A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure’, Psychological Review 102(2): 246–68. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, R.B. and Williams, K.C. (2010) Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. and Neumayer, E. (2007) ‘Do membership benefits buy regulatory compliance? An empirical analysis of EU Directives 1978–99’, European Union Politics 8(2): 180–206. doi: 10.1177/1465116507076429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2003) ‘The euro between national and European identity’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(4): 487–505. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000101235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2005) ‘Neofunctionalism, European identity, and the puzzles of European integration’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 291–309. doi: 10.1080/13501760500044033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1974) ‘Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies’, Journal of Educational Psychology 66(5): 688–701. doi: 10.1037/h0037350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. (2014) ‘European Commission officials’ policy attitudes’, Journal of Common Market Studies 52(4): 911–27. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S. and Knobel, H. (2003) ‘Costs, commitment and compliance: the impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(3): 495–518. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2008) ‘After conditionality: post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 806–25. doi: 10.1080/13501760802196549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., Clark, M.H., and Steiner, P.M. (2008) ‘Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(484): 1334–43. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprungk, C. (2013) ‘Legislative transposition of directives: exploring the other role of national parliaments in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 51(2): 298–315. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. (2006) ‘Turning swift policymaking into deadlock and delay: national policy coordination and the transposition of EU directives’, European Union Politics 7(3): 293–319. doi: 10.1177/1465116506066258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. and Rhinard, M. (2010) ‘The transposition of European law in EU member states: between process and politics’, European Political Science Review 2(3): 495–520. doi: 10.1017/S1755773910000196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. and Toshkov, D. (2009) ‘Comparing transposition in the 27 member states of the EU: the impact of discretion and legal fit’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(7): 951–70. doi: 10.1080/13501760903226625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002) ‘Paths to compliance: enforcement, management and the European Union’, International Organization 56(3): 609–43. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A. and McKimmie, B.M. (2000) ‘Attitude–behavior relations: the role of in-group norms and mode of behavioral decision-making’, British Journal of Social Psychology 39(3): 337–61. doi: 10.1348/014466600164534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, D.J. and Hogg, M.A. (1996) ‘Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: a role for group identification’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(8): 776–93. doi: 10.1177/0146167296228002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2010) ‘Taking stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU Law’, Working Paper, Vienna: Institute for European Integration Research.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2001) ‘Is there any social constructivist-institutionalist divide? Unpacking social mechanisms affecting representational roles among EU decision-makers’, Journal of European Public Policy 8(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1080/13501760010018304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2002) ‘Beyond the EU membership–non-membership dichotomy? Supranational identities among national EU decision-makers’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(3): 468–87. doi: 10.1080/13501760210139722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C. (2005) ‘Explaining the nature of power: a three-process theory’, European Journal of Social Psychology 35(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. (2006) ‘Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation’, Annual Review of Psychology 57: 375–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. and Blader, S.L. (2003) ‘The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 7 (4): 349–61. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. and Huo, Y. (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Versluis, E. (2004) ‘Explaining variations in implementation of EU directives’, European Integration online papers 8(19), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Von Stein, J. (2005) ‘Do Treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance’, American Political Science Review 99(4): 611–62. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M. and Jobling, P. (2006) ‘Legitimacy of regulatory authorities as a function of inclusive identification and power over ingroups and outgroups’, European Journal of Social Psychology 36(2): 239–58. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonka, A. and Rittberger, B. (2014) ‘The ties that bind? intra-party information exchanges of German MPs in EU multi-level politics’, West European Politics 37(3): 624–43. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.830472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoco, E. (2006) ‘Legislators’ positions and party system competition in Central America: a comparative analysis’, Party Politics 12(2): 257–80. doi: 10.1177/1354068806061340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubek, R. and Staronova K. (2010) ‘Ministerial transposition of EU directives: can oversight improve performance?’, Working Paper 9, Vienna: Institute for European Integration Research.
   Google Scholar
• Zuern, M. (2005) ‘Law and compliance at different levels’, in M. Zuern and C. Joerges (eds), Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance beyond the Nation-State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zuern, M. and Checkel, J.T. (2005) ‘Getting socialized to build bridges: constructivism and rationalism, Europe and the nation-state’, International Organization 59(4): 1045–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar