Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity

References

• Barroso, J.M. (2014) ‘Rethinking regulation: keynote speech at the “Smart regulation in the EU” conference’, 14 October, Brussels: European Commission, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-686_en.htm (accessed January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C. and Héritier, A. (eds) (2012) Dismantling Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. and Knill, C. (2012) ‘Understanding policy dismantling: an analytical framework’, in M.W. Bauer, A. Jordan, C. Green-Pedersen and A. Héritier (eds), Dismantling Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University press, pp. 30–51.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C.R., Burden, B.C. and Howell, W.G. (2010) ‘After enactment: the lives and deaths of federal programs’, American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2001) ‘Political institutions, veto points and the process of welfare state adaptation’, in P. Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 238–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2015) ‘The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht era’, Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4): 703–22. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C. (2013) ‘Consensus and compromise become ordinary – but at what cost? A critical analysis of the impact of the changing norms of codecision upon European Parliament committees’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(7): 988–1005. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C. Carter, N. and Worsfold, N. (2012) ‘Enlargement and the environment: the changing behaviour of the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 54–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business Taskforce (2013) ‘Cut EU red tape–report from the Business Taskforce’, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cut-eu-red-tape-report-from-the-business-taskforce (accessed January 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, W., Atkinson, M. and Montpetit, E. (1997) ‘Against the odds: retrenchment in agriculture in France and the United States’, World Politics 49(4): 453–81. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulos, D. (ed.) (2004) The Changing European Commission, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1993) ‘Commission report to the European Council on the adaptation of community legislation to the subsidiarity principle’, COM(93) 545 final, 24 November, Brussels: European Commission, available at http://aei.pitt.edu/919/ (accessed February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2003) ‘Updating and simplifying the Community acquis’, COM(2003) 71 final, 11 February, Brussels: European Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/governance/docs/comm_simple_en.pdf (accessed February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009) ‘Action programme for reducing administrative burdens in the EU sectoral reduction plans and 2009 actions’, COM(2009) 544 final, Brussels: European Commission, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0544:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013), ‘Chapters of the acquis’, available at http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/policy/conditions-membership/chapters-of-the-acquis/index_en.htm (accessed October 2015)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014) ‘Commission staff working document accompanying the document Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT): state of play and outlook’, SWD(2014) 192 Final, Brussels: European Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/docs/scoreboard_en.pdf (accessed February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, A.M. (ed.) (2012) Manual of European Environmental Policy, London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Golub, J. (1996) ‘Sovereignty and subsidiarity in EU environmental policy’, Political Studies XLIV: 686–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01749.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2004) ‘The dependent variable problem within the study of welfare state retrenchment: defining the problem and looking for solutions’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 6(1): 3–14. doi: 10.1080/1387698042000222763
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2007) ‘The European Union as a polity (I)’, in K. Joergensen, M. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds), The Sage Handbook of European Union Politics, London: Sage, pp. 141–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hjerp, P., Homeyer, I., Pallemaerts, M. and Farmer, A. (2010) The Impact of Better Regulation on EU Environmental Policy under the Sixth Environment Action Programme, Brussels: IEEP.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2008) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. and Weaver, R. (2015) ‘When policies undo themselves: self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change’, Governance 28(4): 441–57 doi: 10.1111/gove.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, T. (2000) ‘EU environmental policy in the 1990s: allowing greater national leeway?’, European Environment 10: 96–105. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0976(200003/04)10:2<96::AID-EET221>3.0.CO;2-C
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Bauer, M.W. and Green-Pedersen, C. (2013) ‘Policy dismantling’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(5): 795–805. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.771092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Turnpenny, J. (2012) ‘From dismantling by default to symbolic dismantling: water policy in the United Kingdom’, in M.W. Bauer, A. Jordan, C. Green-Pedersen and A. Héritier (eds), Dismantling Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176–99.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Tosun, J. and Bauer, M.W. (2009) ‘Neglected faces of Europeanization: the differential impact of the EU on the dismantling and expansion of domestic policies’, Public Administration 87(3): 519–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01768.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., Hanschmann, R., Bianculli, A.C. and Juanatey, J.A.G. (2014) ‘Social and environmental policies in hard times: buffering economic pressure by policy dismantling?’, Paper presented at the 5th Regulatory Governance Conference, Barcelona, 25–27 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S. (2010) ‘Social policy’, in H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack and A. Young (eds), Policy Making in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6th ed., pp. 253–82.
   Google Scholar
• Löfsted, R.E. (2007) ‘The plateau-ing of the European better regulation agenda’, Journal of Risk Research 10(4): 423–47. doi: 10.1080/13669870701417793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994) ‘The rise of the regulatory state in Europe’, West European Politics 17(3): 77–101. doi: 10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Malamud, A. (2010) ‘Latin American regionalism and EU studies’, Journal of European Integration 32(6): 637–57. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2010.518720
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken (2013) ‘Testing European legislation for subsidiarity and proportionality Dutch list of points for action’, The Hague: Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, available at http://www.government.nl/documents-and-publications/notes/2013/06/21/testing-european-legislation-for-subsidiarity-and-proportionality-dutch-list-of-points-for-action.html (accessed January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2001) ‘Coping with permanent austerity: welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies’, in P. Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 410–56.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. (1994) ‘Creeping competence: the expanding agenda of the European community’, Journal of Public Policy 14(02): 95–145. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00007418
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. (2005) ‘Theorizing the European Union: international organization, domestic polity, or experiment in new governance?’, Annual Review of Political Science 8(1): 357–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potočnik, J. (2012) ‘Preface’, in A. Jordan and C. Adelle (eds), Environmental Policy in the EU, , 3rd ed., London: Earthscan; Routledgepp. xvii–xviii.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C.M. (2007) ‘Whither better regulation for the Lisbon agenda?’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 190–207. doi: 10.1080/13501760601122274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. (2007) ‘The political science of European integration: disciplinary history and EU studies’, in K. Joergensen, M. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds), The Sage Handbook of European Union Politics, London: Sage, pp. 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (1996) ‘Negative and positive integration in the political economy of European welfare states’, in G. Marks, F.W. Scharpf, P.C. Schmitter and W. Streeck (eds), Governance in the European Union, London: Sage, pp. 15–39.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, R., Hix, S. and Farrel, D.M. (2012) ‘National or European parliamentarians? Evidence from a new survey of the members of the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50(4): 670–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Boerefijn, J. and Stokman, F. (2004) ‘Actor alignments in European union decision making’, European Journal of Political Research 43: 237–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombs, S. and Whyte, D. (2013) ‘Transcending the deregulation debate? Regulation, risk, and the enforcement of health and safety law in the UK’, Regulation & Governance 7(1): 61–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., Radaelli, C., Jordan, A. and Jacob, K. (2009) ‘The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions’, Journal of European Public Policy 16: 640–53. doi: 10.1080/13501760902872783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Abeele, E. (2010) ‘The European Union’s better regulation agenda’; Brussels: European Trade Union Institute, available at http://www.etui.org/Publications2/Reports/The-European-union-s-better-regulation-agenda (accessed January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Viehrig, H. and Oppermann, K. (2008) ‘Issue salience and the domestic legitimacy demands of European integration’, European Integration Online Papers 12: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2012) ‘The politicization of the EU Commission: democratic control and the dynamics of executive selection’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(3): 383–402. doi: 10.1177/0020852312447061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D., Monkhouse, C., Herodes, M. and Farmer, A. (2005) For Better or for Worse? The EU’s Better Regulation Agenda and the Environment, London: IEEP.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R.K. (2002) Environmental Policy-making in Britain, Germany and the European Union, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar