The power of implementers: a three-level game model of compliance with EU policy and its application to cultural heritage

References

• Arulienė, A. (2001) ‘Control of cultural properties export in the Republic of Lithuania’, qvailable at http://www.heritage.lt/unesco/illicit2001/book/61.htm (accessed 30 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. (2003) ‘Guarding the Treaty: the compliance strategies of the European Commission’, in T.A. Börzel and R.A. Cichowski (eds), The State of the European Union: Law, Politics and Society (vol. 6), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–220.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., Hofmann, T., Panke, D. and Sprungk, C. (2010) ‘Obstinate and inefficient: why member states do not comply with European law’, Comparative Political Studies 43: 1363–90. doi: 10.1177/0010414010376910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon: An Examination of Bureaucracy in Modern Organizations and its Cultural Settings in France, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Lucia, L. and Kronsell, A. (2010) ‘The willing, the unwilling and the unable: explaining implementation of the EU biofuels directive’, Journal of European Public Policy 17: 545–63. doi: 10.1080/13501761003673559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. and Steunenberg, B. (2013), ‘Living in parallel universes? Implementing European movable cultural heritage policy in Bulgaria’, Journal of Common Market Studies 51: 246–63. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W.N. and Ferejohn, J. (1992) ‘Making the deal stick: enforcing the original constitutional structure of lawmaking in the modern regulatory state’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8: 165–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2000) ‘Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on the Implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) n° 3911/92 on the export of cultural goods and Council Directive 93/7/EEC on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State’, Com/2000/0325 final, 25 May 2000.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2005) ‘Second report on the application of Council Directive 93/7/EEC on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State’, COM/2005/0675 final, 21 December 2005.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009) ‘Third report on the application of Council Directive 93/7/EEC on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a member state’, COM(2009)408, 30 July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013) ‘Fourth report on the application of Council Directive 93/7/EEC on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a member state’, COM(2013)310, 30 March 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014a) ‘Communication on “Towards an Integrated Approach to Cultural Heritage in Europe”’, COM(2014)477, Brussels, 22 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014b) ‘Mapping of cultural heritage actions in European Union policies, programmes and activities’, Brussels, available at http://ec.europa.eu/culture/library/reports/2014-heritage-mapping_en.pdf (accessed 30 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2014) ‘Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a member state (recast)’, A7-0058/2014, 21 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. and Treib, O. (2008) ‘Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to new member states’, Journal of Common Market Studies 46: 293–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S. (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M., Steunenberg, B. and Van Waarden, F. (2011) ‘Sectors at different speed: analysing transposition deficits in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49: 265–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houwing, B.J. (2015) ‘The Netherlands: goody two-shoes or two-faced? An implementation study of the EU cultural heritage policy in the Netherlands’, MSc thesis in Public Administration, Leiden University, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2014) ‘A new start for Europe: my agenda for jobs, growth, fairness and democratic change’, Opening Statement in the European Parliament, 15 July 2014, Strasbourg, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/president-junckers-political-guidelines_en (accessed 30 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Kesselman, M. (1970) ‘Overinstitutionalization and political constraint: the case of France’, Comparative Politics 3: 21–44. doi: 10.2307/421500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2014) ‘Implementing movable cultural heritage in Lithuania: who cares?’, MSc thesis in Public Administration, Leiden University, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980) Street Level Bureaucracy, Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russel Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loosely, D.L. (2003) ‘Back to the future: rethinking French cultural policy, 1997–2002′, International Journal of Cultural Policy 9: 227–34. doi: 10.1080/1028663032000119260
   Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E. (2005) ‘EU compliance: Still a “black hole”?’, Journal of European Public Policy 12: 1103–20. doi: 10.1080/13501760500270869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. and Vollaard, H. (2014) ‘Implementing Social Europe in times of crises: re-established boundaries of welfare?’, West European Politics 37: 677–92. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.919773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M.D., Noll, R.G. and Weingast, B.R. (1987) ‘Administrative procedures as instruments of political control’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 3: 243–77.
   Google Scholar
• Netten, F.P. (2014) ‘Protecting national treasures: the European Cultural Heritage Policy in the United Kingdom’ MSc thesis in Public Administration, Leiden University, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. (2007) ‘A policy solution to the European Union’s transposition puzzle: interaction of interests in different domestic arenas’, West European Politics 30: 23–49. doi: 10.1080/01402380601019639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. (2010) ‘Is big brother watching? Commission oversight on the national implementation of EC directives’, European Union Politics 11: 359–80. doi: 10.1177/1465116510369395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002) ‘Paths to compliance: enforcement, management and the European Union’, International Organisation 56: 609–43. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D., Knoll, M. and Wewerka, L. (2010) ‘Connecting the dots: a review of case studies of compliance and application of EU law’, Working Paper 10/2010, Vienna: Institute for European Integration Research.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O. (2014) ‘Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs’, Living Review of European Governance 9: 5–47, available at: http://europeangovernance-livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2014-1/ (accessed 30 June 2016). doi: 10.12942/lreg-2014-1
   Google Scholar
• Vasev, N. and Vrangbæk, K. (2014) ‘Transposition and national-level resources: introducing the cross-border healthcare directive in Eastern Europe’, West European Politics 37: 693–710. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.919776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versluis, E. (2007) ‘Even rules, uneven practices: opening the “black box” of EU law in action’, West European Politics 30: 50–67. doi: 10.1080/01402380601019647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidema, M.M.L. (2014) ‘Art going the French way? French implementation of the EU policies on movable cultural goods with the use of actors’ preferences’, MSc thesis in Public Administration, Leiden University, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova, A.C. Kaya and R. Schrama (2016) ‘Notified and substantive compliance with the EU Law in an enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas’, Maxcap Working paper Series No. 20, ‘Maximizing the integration capacity of the European Union: Lessons of and prospects for enlargement and beyond’, Berlin; MAXCAP, at: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/kfgeu/maxcap/system/files/maxcap_wp_20.pdf.
   Google Scholar