Agenda-setting by the European Commission. Seeking public opinion?

References

• Alexandrova, P., Breeman, G, Brouard, S., Carammia, M., Princen, S., Rasmussen, A. and Timmermans, A. (2013) European Union Agendas Project Codebook, Version 3.2, The Hague
   Google Scholar
• Alexandrova, P., Rasmussen, A. and Toshkov, D. (2016) ‘Agenda responsiveness in the European Council’, West European Politics 39(4): 605–27. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1104995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, B., Dür, A. and Marshall, D. (2015) ‘Information or context: what accounts for positional proximity between the European Commission and lobbyists?’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 570–87. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S., Jennings, W. and Wlezien, C. (2016) ‘An analysis of the public’s personal, national and EU issue priorities’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(6): 871–87. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1070191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad, J. (2015) ‘Dynamics of European integration: public opinion in the core and the periphery’, European Union Politics 16(1): 23–44. doi: 10.1177/1465116514551303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, L. (1993) ‘Calling the tune without paying the piper? Social policy regulation: the role of the Commission in European Community social policy’, Policy and Politics 21(2): 135–146. doi: 10.1332/030557393782453899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011) ‘Public opinion in the European Union is broadly favourable to key elements of the forthcoming CAP reform package’, Press Release, IP/11/1136, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-11-1136_en.htm (accessed 24 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014) ‘Telephone interview with official of the Commission’s Eurobarometer unit’, 11 December 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (n.d.) ‘Public opinion analysis – home page’, available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm. (accessed 5 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2012) ‘Mere description’, British Journal of Political Science 42(4): 721–46. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GESIS (n.d.) ‘Standard and special topic Eurobarometer’, available at http://www.gesis.org/en/eurobarometer/survey-series/standard-special-eb/ (accessed 5 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2011) ‘Access of experts: information and EU decision-making’, West European Politics 34(1): 48–70. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.523544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2014) Which Policy for Europe? Power and Conflict inside the European Commission, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. (2013) Business as usual? EU Policy-making Amid the Legitimacy Crisis, (Inaugural Lecture), Amsterdam: Raddraaier
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. and Liefferink, D. (2012) ‘Member state interest articulation in the Commission phase. Institutional pre-conditions for influencing “Brussels”’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 179–219. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.609716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritier, A. (1997) ‘Policy-making by subterfuge: interest accommodation, innovation and substitute democratic legitimation in Europe – perspectives from distinctive policy areas’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(2): 171–89. doi: 10.1080/13501769709696337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpner, M. and Jurczyk, B. (2012) ‘Kritik des Eurobarometers: Űber die Verwischung der Grenze zwischen seriöser Demoskopie und politischer Propaganda‘, Leviathan 40(3): 326–49. doi: 10.5771/0340-0425-2012-3-326
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B, Quittkat, C., Buth, V. and Altides, C. (2013) De-Mystification of Participatory Democracy. EU-governance and Civil Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., Mahoney, C. and Opper, M. (2015) ‘Framing in context: how interest groups employ framing to lobby the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 481–98. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveless, M. and Rohrschneider, R. (2011) ‘Public perception of the EU as a system of governance’, Living Reviews in European Governance, 6(2), available at http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2011-2 (accessed 5 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Metz, J. (2012) ‘The European Commission’s expert groups and their use in policy making’, PhD dissertation, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Osnabrügge, M. (2015) ‘The European Commission and the implementation of its legislative programme’, European Union Politics 16(2): 241–61. doi: 10.1177/1465116515573844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (1994) ‘Creeping competence: the expanding agenda of the European Community’, Journal of Public Policy 14: 95–145. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00007418
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (1997) ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community’, International Organization 52(1): 99–134. doi: 10.1162/002081897550311
   Google Scholar
• Princen, S.B.M. (2011) ‘Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 927–43. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.599960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, M. and Rhinard, M. (2006) ‘Crashing and creeping: agenda setting dynamics in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(7): 1119–32. doi: 10.1080/13501760600924233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. and Haverland, M. (2015) ‘How does the European Commission use scientific expertise? Results from a survey of scientific members of the Commission’s expert committees’, Comparative European Politics 13: 430–49. doi: 10.1057/cep.2013.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris, W.E. and Kaase, M. (eds) (1997) Eurobarometer. Measurement Instruments for Opinion in Europe, Mannheim: ZUMA
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (1999) Governing in Europe. Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Signorelli, S. (2012) ‘The EU and public opinions: a love-hate relationship?’, Studies and Reports, no. 93, November, Notre-Europe. Paris: Jaques Delors Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Smyrl, M.E. (1998) ‘When (and how) do the Commission’s preferences matter?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36(1): 79–99. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2011) ‘Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: a lost relationship’, European Union Politics 12(2): 169–91. doi: 10.1177/1465116510395043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schendelen, R. (2003) ‘The insourced experts’, in R. Van Schendelen and R. Scully (eds), The Unseen Hand: Unelected EU Legislatures, London: Frank Cass, pp. 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, W. and Smith, J. (1995) ‘Democracy or technocracy? European integration and the problem of popular consent’, West European Politics 18(3): 137–57. doi: 10.1080/01402389508425095
   Google Scholar
• Wendon, B. (1998) ‘The Commission as image-venue entrepreneur in EU social policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(2): 339–53. doi: 10.1080/135017698344027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013) The Normalization of the European Commission. Politics and Bureaucracy in the EU Executive, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wonka, A. (2008) ‘Decision-making dynamics in the European Commission: partisan, national or sectoral?’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(8): 1145–63. doi: 10.1080/13501760802407656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar