Larger and more law abiding? The impact of enlargement on compliance in the European Union

References

• Avdeyeva, O.A. (2010) ‘States’ compliance with international requirements: gender equality in EU enlargement countries’, Political Research Quarterly 63(1): 203–17. doi: 10.1177/1065912908327231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batory, A. (2012) ‘Why do anti-corruption laws fail in Central Eastern Europe? A target compliance perspective’, Regulation and Governance 6(1): 66–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. (2000) ‘Why there is no ‘southern problem’. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 7(1): 141–62. doi: 10.1080/135017600343313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. (2001) ‘Non-compliance in the European Union: pathology or statistical artefact?’, Journal of European Public Policy 8(5): 803–24. doi: 10.1080/13501760110083527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. (2009) ‘New modes of governance and accession. The paradox of double weakness’, in T.A. Börzel (ed.), Coping with Accession to the European Union. New Modes of Environmental Governance, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. and Knoll, M. (2012) ‘Quantifying non-compliance in the EU. A database on EU-Infringement proceedings’, Berlin Working Paper on European Integration No. 15, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Center for European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2017) ‘Coming together or driving apart? The EU’s political integration capacity in Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1265574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., Hofmann, T., Panke, D. and Sprungk, C. (2010) ‘Obstinate and inefficient: why member states do not comply with European law’, Comparative Political Studies 43(11): 1363–90. doi: 10.1177/0010414010376910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J.T. (2001) ‘Why comply? Social learning and European identity change’, International Organization 55(3): 553–88. doi: 10.1162/00208180152507551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirtautas, A.M. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2010) ‘Europeanisation before and after accession: conditionality, legacies and compliance’, Europe-Asia Studies 62(3): 421–41. doi: 10.1080/09668131003647812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. and Lijphart, A. (1997) ‘Explaining political and economic change in post-communist easter Europe: old legacies, new institutions, hegemonic norms, and international pressures’, Comparative Political Studies 28(2): 171–99. doi: 10.1177/0010414095028002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A.L. (2010) ‘The new member states in the EU in the aftermath of accession. Empty shells?’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(1): 137–48. doi: 10.1080/13501760903464929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A.L. and Toshkov, D. (2007) ‘The dynamics of domestic coordination of EU policy in the new member states: impossible to lock in?’, West European Politics 30(5): 961–86. doi: 10.1080/01402380701617381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. (2010) ‘Institutional performance and compliance with EU Law: Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia’, Journal of Public Policy 30(1): 101–16. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X09990183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S. (2005) Complying with Europe. EU Harmonization and Soft Law in the Member States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., Treib, O. and Holzleitner, E. (2008) Compliance in the European Union. Living Rights or Dead Letters?, Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, K.H. (2005) ‘The new member states and the EU: responding to Europe’, in S. Bulmer and C. Lequesne (eds.), The Member States of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 254–80.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. (2000) ‘National adaptation to European integration: the importance of institutional veto points’, Journal of Public Policy 20(1): 83–103. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00000763
   Google Scholar
• Hille, P. and Knill, C. (2006) ‘‘It’s the bureaucracy, stupid’. The implementation of the acquis communautaire in EU candidate countries, 1999–2003’, European Union Politics 7(4): 531–52. doi: 10.1177/1465116506069442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Sasse, G. and Gordon, C. (2004) Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU’s Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe. The Myth of Conditionality, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. (2004) The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO. Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E., van Voorst, S. and Meuwese, A. (2015) ‘Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta evaluation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1329–48. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1076874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbaye, H.A.D. (2001) ‘Why national states comply with supranational law. Exlaining impementation infringements in the European Union 1972–1993’, European Union Politics 2(3): 259–81. doi: 10.1177/1465116501002003001
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42(3): 427–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2002) ‘Strength in numbers?: representation and redistribution in the European Union’, European Union Politics 3(2): 151–75. doi: 10.1177/1465116502003002002
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W. (1996) ‘Membership matters: limits of the functional approach to European institutions’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3): 403–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2005) ‘Conclusion. The impact of the EU on the accession countries’, in F. Schimmelfennig and U. Sedelmeier (eds.), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 210–28.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. and Winzen, T. (2014) ‘Instrumental and constitutional differentiation in the European Union’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52(2): 354–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. and Winzen, T. (2017) ‘Eastern enlargement and differentiated integration: towards normalization’, Journal of European Public Policy. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwellnus, G. (2009) ‘It ain’t over when it’s over: the adoption and sustainability of minority protection rules in new EU member states’, European Integration Online Papers 13(Art. 24). available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-024a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2006) ‘Pre-accession conditionality and post-accession compliance in the new member states: a research note’, in W. Sadurski, J. Ziller and K. Zurek (eds.), Après Enlargement: Legal and Political Responses in Central and Eastern Europe, Florence: European University Institute, pp. 145–60.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2008) ‘After conditionality: post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 806–25. doi: 10.1080/13501760802196549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2009) ‘Post-accession compliance with EU gender equality legislation in post-communist new member states’, European Integration Online Papers 13(Art. 23), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-023a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2012) ‘Is Europeanisation through conditionality sustainable? Lock-in of institutional change after EU accession’, West European Politics 35(1): 20–38. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2016) ‘Compliance after Conditionality: Why Are the European Union’s New Member States So Good?’, MAXCAP Working Paper No. 22, “Maximizing the integration capacity of the European Union: Lessons of and prospects for enlargement and beyond”, Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Seleny, A. (2007) ‘Communism’s many legacies in East-Central Europe’, Journal of Democracy 18(3): 156–70. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M. (1954) ‘A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system’, American Political Science Review 48(3): 787–92. doi: 10.2307/1951053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissenich, B. (2005) ‘The transfer of EU social policy transfer of EU social policy to Poland and Hungary’, in F. Schimmelfennig and U. Sedelmeier (eds.), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 156–77.
   Google Scholar
• Slapin, J.B. (2015) ‘How European Union membership can undermine the rule of law in emerging democracies’, West European Politics 38(3): 627–48. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.996378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. and Toshkov, D. (2009) ‘Comparing transposition in the 27 member states of the EU: the impact of discretion and legal fit’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(7): 951–70. doi: 10.1080/13501760903226625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002) ‘Paths to compliance: enforcement, management, and the European Union’, International Organization 56(3): 609–43. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2007a) ‘In search of the worlds of compliance: culture and transposition performance in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(6): 933–54. doi: 10.1080/13501760701497956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2007b) ‘Transposition of EU social policy in the new member states’, Journal of European Social Policy 17(4): 335–48. doi: 10.1177/0958928707081065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2008) ‘Embracing European law: compliance with EU directives in Central and Eastern Europe’, European Union Politics 9(3): 379–402. doi: 10.1177/1465116508093490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2010) ‘Taking Stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU law’, eif Working Paper 01/2010.
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2012) ‘Compliance with EU law in Central and Eastern Europe’, L’Europe en Formation 2: 91–109. doi: 10.3917/eufor.364.0091
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2017) ‘The impact of the eastern enlargement on the decision-making capacity of the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauner, F. (2009) ‘Post-accession compliance with EU law in Bulgaria and Romania: a comparative perspective’, European Integration Online Papers 13(Art. 21). available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/index.php/eiop/article/view/2009_021a/135.
   Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova, A., Börzel, T.A., Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2014) ‘Beyond uniform integration? Reearching the effects of enlargement on the EU’s legal system’, MAXCAP Deliverable 2.2, Berlin, Freie Universität, November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova, A., Kaya, C. and Schrama, R. (2017) ‘Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas’, Journal of European Public Policy. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar