Willing and able? A two-level theory on compliance with civil liberties in the EU

References

• Berglund, S. (2009) Putting Politics into Perspective: A Study on the Implementation of EU Public Utilities Directives , Eburon : Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. , Hofmann, T. and Panke, D. (2012) ‘Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(4): 454–471. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.607338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi-Revilla, C. and Starr, H. (2003) ‘Opportunity, willingness, and political uncertainty: theoretical foundations of politics’, in G. Goertz and H. Starr (eds.), Necessary Conditions. Theory, Methodology and Applications , New York : Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, L. (2014) ‘Compelling criteria? Human rights in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(5): 713–729. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.897742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. and Steunenberg, B. (2013) ‘Living in parallel universes? Implementing European movable cultural heritage policy in Bulgaria’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51(2): 246–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House (2015) ‘Freedom of the Press Index’, available at https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2015 (accessed 5 September 2015).
   Google Scholar
• George, R.P. (1993) Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality , Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. and Mahoney J. (2005) ‘Two-level theories and fuzzy-set analysis’, Sociological Methods & Research 33(4): 497–538. doi: 10.1177/0049124104266128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. and Tsutsui, K. (2005) ‘Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises’, American Journal of Sociology 110(5): 1373–1411. doi: 10.1086/428442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. and Tsutsui, K. (2007) ‘Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most’, Journal of Peace Research 44(4): 407–425. doi: 10.1177/0022343307078942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, O.A. (2002) ‘Do human rights treaties make a difference?’, The Yale Law Journal 111(8): 1935–2042. doi: 10.2307/797642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, O.A. (2007) ‘Why do countries commit to human rights treaties?’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(4): 588–621. doi: 10.1177/0022002707303046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. and Romeijn, M. (2007) ‘Do member states make European policies work? Analysing the EU transposition deficit’, Public Administration 85(3): 757–778. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00670.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPD (2012) ‘Institutional profiles database’, available at http://www.cepii.fr/institutions/EN/ipd.asp (accessed 20 April 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Kaeding, M. (2008) ‘Lost in translation or full steam ahead: the transposition of EU transport directives across member states’, European Union Politics 9(1): 115–143. doi: 10.1177/1465116507085959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeding, M. , Schmälter, J. and Klika, C. (2017) Pharmacovigilance in the EU: Practical Implementation across Member States . Wiesbaden : Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, P. and Stasavage, D. (2003) ‘The limits of delegation: veto players, Central bank independence and the credibility of monetary policy’, American Political Science Review 97(3): 407–423. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, H. (1999) ‘How is international human rights law enforced?’, Indiana Law Journal 74(4): 1397–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krommendijk, J. (2014) The Domestic Impact and Effectiveness of the Process of State Reporting under UN Human Rights Treaties in the Netherlands, New Zealand and Finland. Paper Pushing or policy prompting? , Cambridge : Intersentia Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lampinen, P. and Uusikylä, P. (1998) ‘Implementation deficit: Why member states do not comply with EU directives?’, Scandinavian Political Studies 21: 231–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1998.tb00014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. , Jaggers, K. and Gurr, T. (2014) Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristic and Transitions, 1800-2012, Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E. (2005) ‘EU compliance: still a “black hole”?’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(6): 1103–1120. doi: 10.1080/13501760500270869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1997) ‘Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics’, International Organization 51(4): 513–553. doi: 10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2000) ‘The origins of human rights regimes: democratic delegation in postwar Europe’, International Organization 54(2): 217–252. doi: 10.1162/002081800551163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most, B. and Starr, H. (1993) Inquiry, Logic and International Politics . Columbia : University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. (2012) ‘Protecting the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion under the European convention on human rights’, in Council of Europe human rights handbooks , Strasbourg : Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2012) ‘Religious hostilities reach six-year high’, available at http://www.pewforum.org/2014/01/14/appendix-2-government-restrictions-index/ (accessed 8 September 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. and Slaughter, A. (2002) ‘International law, international relations and compliance’, in W. Carlsnaes , T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations , London : Sage, pp. 538–558.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. and Ropp, S. (2013) ‘Introduction and overview’, in T. Risse , S. Ropp and K. Sikkink (eds.), The persistent power of human rights. From commitment to compliance , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2005) ‘Strategic calculation and international socialization: membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe’, International Organization 59: 827–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C.Q. and Rohlfing, I. (2013) ‘Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research’, Sociological Methods & Research 42(4): 559–597. doi: 10.1177/0049124113481341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2008) ‘After conditionality: post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 806–825. doi: 10.1080/13501760802196549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SGI . (2015) ‘Sustainable governance indicators’, Bertelsmann Stiftung, available at http://www.sgi-network.org/2015/ (accessed 20 April 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights. International Law in Domestic Politics , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. (2006) ‘Turning swift policy-making into deadlock and delay: national policy coordination and the transposition of EU directives’, European Union Politics 7(3): 293–319. doi: 10.1177/1465116506066258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Factbook (2015) Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/be.html (accessed 6 April 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2011) ‘Taking stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU law’, EIF Working Article 01/2010, Vienna: Institute for European Integration Research.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O. (2014) ‘Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs’, Living Reviews in European Governance 9, 1, available at http://europeangovernance-livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2014-1 (accessed 16 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Tsutsui, K. and Wotipka, C.M. (2008) ‘Global human rights and state sovereignty: state ratification of international human rights treaties, 1965–2001’, Sociological Forum 23(4): 724–754. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versluis, E. (2007) ‘Even rules, uneven practices: opening the ‘black box’ of EU law in action’, West European Politics 30(1): 50–67. doi: 10.1080/01402380601019647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhelyaskova, A. , Kaya, C. and Schrama, R. (2016) ‘Decoupling practical and legal compliance: analysis of member states’ implementation of EU policy’, European Journal of Political Research 55(4): 827–846. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar