Stakeholders wanted! Why and how European Union agencies involve non-state stakeholders

References

• Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. (2013) ‘Taking responsive regulation transnational: strategies for international organizations’, Regulation and Governance 7(1): 95–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T. and Gampfer, R. (2013) ‘Effects of civil society involvement on popular legitimacy of global environmental governance’, Global Environmental Change 23(2): 439–449. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2003) ‘Enrolling actors in regulatory systems: examples from UK financial services regulation’, Public Law 2003( Spring): 63–91.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., Koutalakis, C. and Wendler, F. (2007) ‘European agencies and input legitimacy: EFSA, EMeA and EPO in the post-delegation Phase’, Journal of European Integration 29(5): 583–600. doi: 10.1080/07036330701694899
   Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2002) ‘Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(3): 365–390. doi: 10.1080/13501760210138796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007) ‘New forms of accountability and EU-Governance’, Comparative European Politics 5(1): 104–120. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110101
   Google Scholar
• Braun, C. (2012) ‘The captive or the broker? Explaining public agency-interest group interactions’, Governance 25(2): 291–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01567.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M. (2009) ‘Accountability, control and independence: the case of European Agencies’, European Law Journal 15(5): 599–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, E. M. and Lodge, M. (2016) ‘The reputational basis of public accountability’, Governance 29(2): 247–263. doi: 10.1111/gove.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., Groenleer, M. and Trondal, J. (2012) ‘The phenomenon of European Union agencies: setting the scene’, in M. Busuioc, M. Groenleer, and J. Trondal (eds), The Agency Phenomenon in the European Union: Emergence, Institutionalisation and Everyday Decision-Making, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, pp. 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P. (2001) The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P. (2010) Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P. and Moss, D. A. (2014) Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. and Katsaitis, A. (2013) ‘Chameleon pluralism in the EU: an empirical study of the European Commission interest group density and diversity across policy domains’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(8): 1104–1119. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.781785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C., Zeckhauser, R. and Parson, E. (2004) ‘Seeking truth for power: informational strategy and regulatory policy making’, Minnesota Law Review 109(89): 277–341.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. (2005) ‘Delegation to EU Non – majoritarian agencies and emerging practices of public accountability’, in D. Geradin, R. Muñoz, and N. Petit (eds.), Regulation Through Agencies in the EU: A New Paradigm of European Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 87–117.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. and Dehousse, R. (2012) ‘European union agencies: tipping the balance?’, in M. Busuioc, M. Groenleer, and J. Trondal (eds), The Agency Phenomenon in the European Union: Emergence, Institutionalisation and Everyday Decision-Making, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, pp. 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I. (2016) ‘Pressure and expertise: explaining the information supply of interest groups in EU legislative lobbying’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54(3): 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. (1997) ‘Regulation by networks in the European community  the role of European agencies’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(2), 246–261. doi: 10.1080/13501769709696341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B. (2014) ‘The visible hand of the state: on the organizational development of interest groups’, Public Administration 92(2): 406–421. doi: 10.1111/padm.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B., Beyers, J. and Donas, T. (2014) ‘The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness institutionalized interest group involvement through advisory Councils’, Political Studies 63(3): 569–588.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, S. R. and Kerwin, C. M. (2004) ‘Interest group participation in rule making: a decade of change’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 353–370. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2005) ‘The institutional foundations of regulatory capitalism: the diffusion of independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1): 84–101. doi: 10.1177/0002716204271833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2015) ‘Societal inclusion in expert venues: participation of interest groups and business in the European commission expert groups’, Politics and Governance 3(1): 151–165. doi: 10.17645/pag.v3i1.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabosky, P. (2013) ‘Beyond responsive regulation: the expanding role of non-state actors in the regulatory process’, Regulation and Governance 7(1): 114–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01147.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. L. and Deardorff, A. V. (2006) ‘Lobbying as legislative Subsidy’, American Political Science Review 100(1): 69–84. doi: 10.1017/S0003055406062010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Rothstein, H. and Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. R. (2002) ‘The politics of ‘Eurocratic’ structure and the New European Agencies’, West European Politics 25(4): 93–118. doi: 10.1080/713601644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. and Tarrant, A. D. (2011) ‘The political foundations of the Eurocracy’, West European Politics 34(5): 922–947. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.591076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C. (2014) ‘Theorizing and explaining voluntary accountability’, Public Administration 92(3): 565–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, B. L., Baumgartner, F. R., La Pira, T. M. and Semanko, N. A. (2005) ‘Drawing lobbyists to Washington: government activity and the demand for advocacy’, Political Research Quarterly 58(1): 19–30. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2011) ‘Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: towards a single European regulatory Space’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(6): 810–829. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.593309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M. (2007) ‘De facto independence after delegation: a fuzzy-set analysis’, Regulation & Governance 1(4): 271–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M. and Verhoest, K. (2014) ‘Unexplored aspects of bureaucratic autonomy: a state of the field and ways forward’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(2): 239–256. doi: 10.1177/0020852314524680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1999) ‘The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems’, West European Politics 22(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1080/01402389908425284
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. G., Verbruggen, P. and Fearne, A. (2013) ‘Risk-based approaches to food safety regulation: what role for co-regulation?’, Journal of Risk Research 16(9): 1101–1121. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2012.743157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M. D. and Schwartz, T. (1984) ‘Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire Alarms’, American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165–179. doi: 10.2307/2110792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. R. (2002) ‘Rational fictions: central bank independence and the social logic of delegation’, West European Politics 25(1): 47–76. doi: 10.1080/713601585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E., Barbieri, D., Bellé, N. and Fedele, P. (2012) ‘European Union (EU) Agencies’, in K. Verhoest, S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert, and P. Lægreid (eds), Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons From 30 Countries, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 400–410.
   Google Scholar
• Ottow, A. T. (2015) Market and Competition Authorities. Good Agency Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. H., Halpin, D. R. and Rasmussen, A. (2015) ‘Who gives evidence to parliamentary committees? A comparative investigation of parliamentary committees and their constituencies’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 21(3): 408–427. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. and Wonka, A. (2011) ‘Introduction: agency governance in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(6): 780–789. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.593356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. (2011) ‘Does horizontal accountability work? Evaluating potential remedies for the Accountability deficit of agencies’, Administration & Society 43(3): 387–416. doi: 10.1177/0095399711412931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. (1971) ‘The theory of economic regulation’, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1): 3–21. doi: 10.2307/3003160
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, M. (2014) ‘European civil society and the EU fundamental rights agency: creating legitimacy through civil society inclusion?’, Journal of European Integration 36(5): 435–451. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2013.865730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, P. (2013) ‘Gorillas in the closet? Public and private actors in the enforcement of transnational private regulation’, Regulation and Governance 7(4): 512–532. doi: 10.1111/rego.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1974) Political Organizations, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wonka, A. and Rittberger, B. (2010) ‘Credibility, complexity and uncertainty: explaining the institutional independence of 29 EU agencies’, West European Politics 33(4): 730–752. doi: 10.1080/01402381003794597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar