Towards a theory of disintegration

References

• Angresano, J. (1997) The Political Economy of Gunnar Myrdal: An Institutional Basis for the Transformation Problem, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S. (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring Between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2009) ‘Revisiting the nature of the beast – politicization, European identity, and postfunctionalism: a comment on Hooghe and Marks’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 217–20. doi: 10.1017/S000712340800046X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler, A., Anders, L.H. and Tuntschew, T. (2016) ‘Europe’s Political, Social, and Economic (Dis-) Integration: Revisiting the Elephant in Times of Crisis’, IHS Political Science Series Working Paper No. 143, October.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (2016) ‘Conclusions: the postfunctionalists were (almost) right’, in S. Hutter, E. Grande, and H. Kriesi (eds.), Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–300.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (eds) (2016) Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. and Kasak, C. (2017) ‘Balancing Sub-unit autonomy and collective problem-solving by varying exit and voice. An analytical framework’, Journal of European Public Policy 24(4): 598–614. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1273376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (2003) ‘Idiosyncrasy and integration: suggestions from comparative political economy’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(1): 140–58. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000046985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (2006) ‘Europe’s market liberalization is a bad model for a global trade agenda’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 943–57. doi: 10.1080/13501760600838714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (2012) ‘The JCMS annual review lecture: European crisis, European solidarity’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50(Annual Review): 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2009) ‘Rejoinder to Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, “A postfunctional theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus”’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 221–4. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D.H. (2008) Thinking in Systems, White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, G. (1956) An International Economy: Problems and Prospects, New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2001) The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. (2009) ‘On the way to a post-functionalist theory of European integration’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 211–5. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollaard, H. (2014) ‘Explaining European disintegration’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1142–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, D. (2014) ‘How likely is it that the European Union will Disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives’, European Journal of International Relations 20(2): 341–65. doi: 10.1177/1354066112461286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, F.R. (1968) France, Germany, and the New Europe: 1945–1967, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. (2007) Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. (2014) Is the EU Doomed? Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar