Why and how do think tanks expand their networks in times of crisis? The case of Bruegel and the Centre for European Policy Studies

References

• Ban, C. (2015) ‘Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the international monetary fund since the great Recession’, Governance 28(2): 167–83. doi: 10.1111/gove.12099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2008) ‘The political functions of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(4), 471–88. doi: 10.1080/13501760801996634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, S. et al. (2004) ‘Europe and its think tanks: a promise to be fulfilled. An analysis of think tanks specialised in European policy issues in the enlarged European Union’, Notre Europe, Studies and Research n° 35.
   Google Scholar
• Bruegel. (2012) ‘Annual Report’, p. 19, available report http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Annual-Report-2012-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Verduyn, M. (2016) ‘Moral economese of scale? Crisis, discursive change and the varying authority of economists’, Global Society 30(4), 507–30. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2016.1158697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. and Pedersen, O. K. (2014) The Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany and Denmark, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B. and Schmidt, V. A. (2016) ‘Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(3), 318–37. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakakis, M. and Rowell, J. (2013). The Field of Eurocracy, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. (2004) ‘When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(4), 569–92. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000248034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgadóttir, O. (2016) ‘The bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(3), 392–409. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1106573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, L. F. and Seabrooke, L. (2016) ‘Transnational organizing: issue professionals in environmental sustainability networks’, Organization 23(5), 722–41. doi: 10.1177/1350508415609140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorion, P. and Colmant, B. (2014) Penser l’économie autrement, Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Lebaron, F. (2012) ‘Les dirigeants de la BCE, une nouvelle ‘élite’ monétaire européenne’, in D. Georgakakis (ed.), Le champ de l’Eurocratie, Paris: Economica, pp. 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J. G. (2015) ‘2014 Global Go To Tink Tank Index Report’, CSP Global Go To Tink Tank Index Reports, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, available at http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/8
   Google Scholar
• Missiroli, A. and Ioannides, I. (2012) European Think Tanks and the EU, BEPA, issue n° 2, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2144865
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S. and Vauchez, A. (2015) ‘Fielding supranationalism: The European Central Bank as a field effect’, Sociological Review 64(2): 146–69.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, H. (2011) ‘Revisiting the think-tank phenomenon’, Public Policy and Administration 26(4): 419–35. doi: 10.1177/0952076710378328
   Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D. et al. (eds) (2011) Neoliberal Hegemony. A Global Critique, London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2016) ‘Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: a discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission’, West European Politics 39(5): 1032–52. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E. (2014) ‘Distinctions, affiliations, and professional knowledge in financial reform expert groups’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(3), 389–407. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.882967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrington, P. (2000) ‘Shaping the policy agenda: think tank activity in the European Union’, Global Society 14(2), 173–89. doi: 10.1080/13600820050008430
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2000) ‘Introduction to the symposium: The changing think tank landscape’, Global Society 14(2), 149–52. doi: 10.1080/13600820050008412
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2007) ‘Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes’, Public Administration 85, 259–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2013) Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: the Private and Public Policy Nexus in the Global Era, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. and Ladi, S. (2015) ‘Global public policy and transnational administration’, Public Administration 93(4), 839–55. doi: 10.1111/padm.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich, H. (2004) ‘European Union think tanks: generating ideas, analysis and debate’, in D. Stone and A. Denham (eds), Thinks Tanks Traditions. Policy Research and the Policy of Ideas, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 51–68.
   Google Scholar