No welfare magnets – free movement and cross-border welfare in Germany and Denmark compared

References

• Blauberger, M. et al. (2018, forthcoming) ‘ECJ judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence’, Journal of European Public Policy.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borjas, G.J. (1999) ‘Immigration and welfare magnets’, Journal of Labor Economics 17(4): 607–37. doi: 10.1086/209933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruzelius, C., Reinprecht, C. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2017) ‘Stratified social rights limiting EU citizenship’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55(6): 1239–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant, L.J. (2002) Justice Contained, Law and Politics in the European Union, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. (2018, forthcoming) ‘Has the court changed, or have the cases? The deservingness of litigants as an element in court of justice adjudication’, Journal of European Public Policy.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, G. and Pellizzari, M. (2009) ‘Welfare migration in Europe’, Labour Economics 16(4): 353–63. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A.L. and Steunenberg, B. (2017) ‘The power of implementers: a three-level game model of compliance with EU policy and its application to cultural heritage’, Journal of European Public Policy 24(8): 1211–32. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1223156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, A., Steen Knudsen, J. and Wagner, B. (2016) ‘Winning the battle or losing the war: the impact of European integration on labour market institutions in Germany and Denmark’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(8): 1218–39. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1186209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindlmaier, A. and Blauberger, M. (2017) ‘Enter at your own risk: free movement of EU citizens in practice’, West European Politics 40(6): 1198–1217. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1294383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpner, M. and Schäfer, A. (2012) ‘Embeddedness and regional integration: waiting for Polanyi in a Hayekian setting’, International Organization 66(3): 429–55. doi: 10.1017/S002081831200015X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal, N. (2005) ‘New immigrants’ location choices: magnets without welfare’, Journal of Labor Economics 23(1): 59–80. doi: 10.1086/425433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvist, J. (2004) ‘Does EU enlargement start a race to the bottom? Strategic interaction among EU member states in social policy’, Journal of European Social Policy 14(3): 301–18. doi: 10.1177/0958928704044625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. (2005) ‘The europeanization of welfare. The domestic impact of Intra-European social security’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(5): 1027–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2005.00607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. and Pons Rotger, G. (2017) ‘The fiscal impact of EU immigration on the tax-financed welfare state: testing the ‘welfare burden’ thesis’, European Union Politics, 18(4): 620–39. doi: 10.1177/1465116517717340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P.E. and Rom, M.C. (2010) Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. (2004) ‘Joining the European Communities: Denmark’s road to EC-membership, 1961–73’, Ph.D. dissertation, European University Institute, Florence.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhs, M. (2015) ‘Is Unrestricted Immigration Compatible with Inclusive Welfare States? The (Un)Sustainability of EU Exceptionalism’, Working Paper No. 125, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2010) ‘The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a ‘social market economy’’, Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 211–50. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, A. and Schmidt, S.K. (2018, forthcoming) ‘Failing on the social dimension: judicial law-making and student mobility in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K., Blauberger, M. and Martinsen, D.S. (2018, forthcoming) ‘Free movement and equal treatment in an unequal Union’, Journal of European Public Policy.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabbara, A. (2009) ‘Zusammenführung oder Einverleibung? Die Sozialgerichtsbarkeit und ihr Verhältnis zur Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit’, Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialrecht 18(9): 483–89.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, F. (2016) ‘Social benefits and cross-border mobility. Sticking to principles may yield better practical results for everybody’, Tribune, Notre Europe Institut Jacques Delors, available at http://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/socialbenefitscrossbordermobility-vandenbroucke-jdi-june16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Waarden, F. (2009) ‘Power to the legal professionals: Is there an Americanization of European law?’, Regulation & Governance 3(3): 197–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, M., Martinsen, D.S. and Pons Rotger, G. (2009) ‘The uneven legal push for Europe. Questioning variation when national courts go to Europe’, European Union Politics 10(1): 63–88. doi: 10.1177/1465116508099761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar