ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence

References

• Alter, K. J. (2014) The New Terrain of International Law. Courts, Politics, Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W. (1993) ‘Europe before the court: a political theory of legal integration’, International Organization 47(1): 41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J.A. and Tarrow, S. (2009) ‘Polanyi in Brussels: supranational institutions and the transnational embedding of markets’, International Organization 63(4): 593–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C.J. and Gabel, M.J. (2015) International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements. A General Theory with Evidence from the European Union, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C.J., Gabel, M. and Hankla, C. (2008) ‘Judicial behavior under political constraints: evidence from the European Court of Justice’, American Political Science Review 102(4): 435–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T.S. (2009) ‘The separation of powers, court curbing, and judicial legitimacy’, American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 971–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costamagna, F. (2016) ‘Restricting access to social benefits and the lasting legacy of the Brexit debate’, available at http://www.euvisions.eu/restricting-access-to-social-benefits-and-the-lasting-legacy-of-the-brexit-debate/ (accessed 15 June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. (2014) ‘Legislative control of the European Court of Justice’, Common Market Law Review 51(6): 1579–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G. (2018) ‘Has the Court changed, or have the cases? The deservingness of litigants as an element in Court of Justice citizenship adjudication’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1488881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., Leupold, A. and Schmidtke, H. (2016) ‘Introduction: the differentiated politicisation of European governance’, West European Politics 39(1): 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, B. (2012) ‘Transnational solidarity and the mediation of conflicts of justice in Europe’, European Law Journal 18(5): 694–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougan, M. (2013) ‘The bubble that burst: exploring the legitimacy of the case law on the free movement of union citizens’, in M. Adams, H. de Waele and J. Meeusen (eds.), Judging Europe’s Judges. The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 127–54.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. and Martin, A. D. (2011) ‘Does public opinion influence the Supreme Court? Probably yes (but we’re not sure why)’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 13(2): 263–81.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2008) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application of Directive 2004/38/EC on the Right of Citizens of the Union and Their Family Members to Move and Reside Freely Within the Territory of the Member States. COM(2008) 840/3, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, R.B. and Wood, B.D. (1997) ‘The public and the Supreme Court: individual justice responsiveness to American policy moods’, American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 468–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, G., Kelemen, R.D. and Schulz, H. (1998) ‘The European Court of justice, national governments, and legal integration in the European Union’, International Organization 52(1): 149–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindlmaier, A. and Blauberger, M. (2017) ‘Enter at your own risk: free movement of EU citizens in practice’, West European Politics 40(6): 1198–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2011) Eurolegalism. The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2012) ‘The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, D. (2016) ‘Earning social citizenship in the European Union: free movement and access to social assistance benefits reconstructed’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 18: 270–301.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O. and Naurin, D. (2016) ‘Judicial independence and political uncertainty: how the risk of override affects the court of justice of the EU’, International Organization 70(1): 377–408.
   Google Scholar
• Mantu, S. and Minderhoud, P. (2015) Solidarity (Still) in the Making or a Bridge Too Far?, Nijmwegen: Nijmwegen Migration Law Working Papers 2015/01.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. (2015) An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, C.R. (2016) ‘Civis capitalist sum: class as the new guiding principle of EU free movement rights’, Common Market Law Review 53(4): 937–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, C.R. (2017) ‘The ECJ sacrifices EU citizenship in vain: Commission v. United Kingdom’, Common Market Law Review 54(1): 209–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peers, S. (2014) ‘Benefit tourism by EU citizens: the CJEU just says no’, available at http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.de/search?q=Benefit+tourism (accessed 25 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Šadl, U. and Madsen, M.R. (2016) ‘Did the financial crisis change European citizenship law? An analysis of citizenship rights adjudication before and after the financial crisis’, European Law Journal 22(1): 40–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2010) ‘The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a “social market economy”’, Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 211–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2012) ‘Perpetual momentum: directed and unconstrained?’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 127–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K. (2012) ‘Who cares about nationality? The path-dependent case law of the ECJ from goods to citizens’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 8–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuibhne, N.N. (2015) ‘Limits rising, duties ascending: the changing legal shape of union citizenship’, Common Market Law Review 52(4): 889–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaventa, E. (2017) ‘Earned citizenship - understanding union citizenship through its scope’, in D. Kochenov (ed.), Citizenship and Federalism in the European Union: The Role of Rights. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, E. (1981) ‘Lawyers, judges, and the making of a transnational constitution’, American Journal of International Law 75(1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Gschwend, T., Wittig, C. and Engst, B. G. (2015) ‘Zum Einfluss der öffentlichen Meinung auf Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Eine Analyse von abstrakten Normenkontrollen sowie Bund-Länder-Streitigkeiten 1974–2010’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56(4): 570–98.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A. and Brunell, T.L. (2012) ‘The European Court of justice, state noncompliance, and the politics of override’, American Political Science Review 106(1): 204–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thym, D. (2014) ‘EU free movement as a legal construction – not as social imagination’.
   Google Scholar
• Thym, D. (2015) ‘The elusive limits of solidarity: residence rights and social benefits for economically inactive union citizens’, Common Market Law Review 52(1): 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschueren, H. (2015) ‘Preventing “benefit tourism” in the EU: a narrow or broad interpretation of the possibilities offered by the ECJ in Dano?’, Common Market Law Review 52(2): 363–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, J.H.H. (1991) ‘The transformation of Europe’, The Yale Law Journal 100(1): 2402–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wollenschläger, F. (2011) ‘A new fundamental freedom beyond market integration: union citizenship and its dynamics for shifting the economic paradigm of European integration’, European Law Journal 17(1): 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar