Has the Court changed, or have the cases? The deservingness of litigants as an element in Court of Justice citizenship adjudication

References

• Alter, K.J. (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. (2012) ‘With Luxembourg in mind … the remaking of national policies in the face of ECJ jurisprudence’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 109–26. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.632150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., et al. (2018) ‘ECJ judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobek, M. (2015) ‘Conclusions: of form and substance in Central European judicial transitions’, in M. Bobek (ed.), Central European Judges under the European Influence: The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited, Oxford: Hart, pp. 391–418.
   Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C.J. and Gabel, M.J. (2015) International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements. A General Theory with Evidence from the European Union, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. (2016) Migrant Union Citizens and Social Assistance: Trying to be Reasonable about Self-sufficiency. Research Paper in Law 2/2016, Bruges: College of Europe/European Legal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Golub, J. (1996) ‘The politics of judicial discretion: rethinking the interaction between national courts and the European Court of Justice’, West European Politics 19(2): 360–85. doi: 10.1080/01402389608425138
   Google Scholar
• Iliopoulou-Penot, A. (2016) ‘Deconstructing the former edifice of union citizenship? The Alimanovic judgment’, Common Market Law Review 53(4): 1007–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2012) ‘The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 43–58. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.632127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, D. (2016) ‘Earning social citizenship in the European Union: free movement and access to social assistance benefits reconstructed’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 18: 270–301. doi: 10.1017/cel.2016.10
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, D., van Hooren, F., and Thierry, J.S. (2018) ‘Responding to free movement: quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1488882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafleur, J.-M. and Mescoli, E. (2018) ‘Creating undocumented EU migrants through welfare: a conceptualization of undeserving and precarious citizenship’, Sociology 52(3): 480–496. doi: 10.1177/0038038518764615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson, O. and Naurin, D. (2016) ‘Judicial independence and political uncertainty: how the risk of override affects the Court of Justice of the EU’, International Organization 70(1): 377–408. doi: 10.1017/S0020818316000047
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D.S. (2015) An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nic Shuibhne, N. (2015) ‘Limits rising, duties ascending: the changing legal shape of Union citizenship’, Common Market Law Review 52(4): 889–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyikos, S.A. (2006) ‘Strategic interaction among courts within the preliminary reference process – stage 1: national court pre-emptive opinions’, European Journal of Political Research 45(4): 527–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, C. (2016) ‘Civis capitalist sum: class as the new guiding principle of EU free movement rights’, Common Market Law Review 53(4): 937–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, C. (2017) ‘A. Court of justice the ECJ sacrifices EU citizenship in vain: commission v. United Kingdom’, Common Market Law Review 54(1): 209–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruger, T.W., Kim, P.T., Martin, A.D. and Quinn, K.M. (2004) ‘The Supreme Court forecasting project: legal and political science approaches to predicting Supreme Court decision-making’, Columbia Law Review 104: 1150–210. doi: 10.2307/4099370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šadl, U. and Madsen, M.R. (2016) ‘Did the financial crisis change European citizenship law? An analysis of citizenship rights adjudication before and after the financial crisis’, European Law Journal 22(1): 40–60. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankari, S., and Frerichs, S. (2016) ‘From resource to burden: rescaling solidarity with strangers in the single market’, European Law Journal 22(6): 806–21. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (2010) ‘The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a “social market economy”’, Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 211–50. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K. (2012) ‘Who cares about nationality? The path-dependent case law of the ECJ from goods to citizens’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(1): 8–24. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.632122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaventa, E. (2017) ‘Earned citizenship – understanding union citizenship through its scope’, in D. Kochenov (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 204–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A. and Brunell, T. (2012) ‘The European Court of Justice, state non-compliance, and the politics of override’, American Political Science Review 106(1): 204–13. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thym, D. (2015). 'The elusive limits of solidarity: residence rights of and social benefits for economically inactive Union citizens', Common Market Law Review 52(1): 17–50.
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W. (2000) ‘Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public’, Policy and Politics 28(1): 33–48. doi: 10.1332/0305573002500811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W. (2006) ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 23–42. doi: 10.1177/0958928706059829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschueren H. (2015) ‘Preventing “benefit tourism” in the EU: a narrow or broad interpretation of the possibilities offered by Dano’, Common Market Law Review 52(2): 363– 90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollenschläger, F. (2011), A new fundamental freedom beyond market integration: Union citizenship and its dynamics for shifting the economic paradigm of European integration, European Law Journal 17(1): 1–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00536.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar