Public voices in the heavenly chorus? Group type bias and opinion representation

References

• Andsager, J.L. (2000) ‘How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77(3): 577–92. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni, L., Carroll, B.J., Chalmers, A.W., Marquez, L.M.M. and Rasmussen, A. (2014) ‘Defining and classifying interest groups’, Interest Groups and Advocacy 3(2): 141–59. doi: 10.1057/iga.2014.9
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J.M. (1999) The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, S. (2013) ‘Continuing the collective action dilemma: the survival of voluntary associations in the United States’, Political Research Quarterly 66(3): 545–58. doi: 10.1177/1065912912456096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A.S., Christiansen, P.M. and Pedersen, H.H. (2014) ‘A privileged position? The influence of business interests in government consultations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(4): 879–96. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muu028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2014) American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress: What the Public Wants and What It Gets, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, R.L. and Nicholson, S.P. (2013) ‘Extreme voices interest groups and the misrepresentation of issue publics’, Public Opinion Quarterly 77(4): 861–87. doi: 10.1093/poq/nft032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville, A. (2010) Democracy in America: historical-critical edition of de la démocratie en Amérique, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2013) ‘Gaining access or going public? Interest group strategies in five European countries’, European Journal of Political Research 52(5): 660–86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2014) ‘Public opinion and interest group influence: how citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(8): 1199–217. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, S.R. and Kerwin, C.M. (2004) ‘Interest group participation in rule making: a decade of change’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 353–70. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2000) By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Elections, Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. (2012) Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. and Page, B.I. (2014) ‘Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens’, Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81. doi: 10.1017/S1537592714001595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, M. and Ferland, B. (2017) ‘Electoral systems and citizen-elite ideological congruence’, in E. Herron, R. Pekkanen and M. Shugart (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–246.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, M. and Stramski, J. (2010) ‘Ideological congruence and electoral institutions’, American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 90–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (2000) The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoke, T.T. (2003) ‘Choosing battlegrounds: interest group lobbying across multiple venues’, Political Research Quarterly 56(3): 325–36. doi: 10.1177/106591290305600307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J.D. and Powell Jr., G.B. (1994) ‘Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy’, World Politics 46(3): 291–326. doi: 10.2307/2950684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (2016) ‘Changing of the guard: trends in corporatist arrangements in 42 highly industrialized societies from 1960 to 2010’, Socio-Economic Review 14(1): 47–71. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwu028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.E. and Margalit, Y. (2017) ‘Informed preferences? The impact of unions on workers’ policy views’, American Journal of Political Science 61(3): 728–43. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2011) ‘Lobbying in coalitions: interest group influence on European Union policy-making’, Nuffield’s Working Papers Series in Politics 2011(4): 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kollman, K. (1998) Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. and Brasher, H. (2004) Organized Interests and American Government, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (1995) ‘The population ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the natural regulation of interest group numbers in the American states’, American Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–29. doi: 10.2307/2111755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (2004) ‘Bias in the heavenly chorus’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 16(1): 5–29. doi: 10.1177/0951629804038900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (2016) ‘On the political origins of bias in the heavenly chorus’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 5(1): 25–56. doi: 10.1057/iga.2015.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., et al. (2015) ‘Images of an unbiased interest system’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(8): 1212–31. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1049197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T.J. (1964) ‘American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory’, World Politics 16(4): 677–715. doi: 10.2307/2009452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEntire, K.J., Leiby, M. and Krain, M. (2015) ‘Human rights organizations as agents of change: an experimental examination of framing and micromobilization’, American Political Science Review 109(3): 407–26. doi: 10.1017/S0003055415000295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, A.S. (1991) ‘Interest groups and political time: cycles in America’, British Journal of Political Science 21(3): 257–84. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006165
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, A. (2010) ‘Interest group theory’, in L.S. Maisel, J.M. Berry and G.C. Edwards III (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, B.I., Shapiro, R.Y. and Dempsey, G.R. (1987) ‘What moves public opinion?’, American Political Science Review 81(1): 23–43. doi: 10.2307/1960777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. and Carroll, B.J. (2014) ‘Determinants of upper-class dominance in the heavenly chorus: lessons from European Union online consultations’, British Journal of Political Science 44(2): 445–59. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., Carroll, B., and Lowery, D. (2014) ‘Representatives of the Public? Public opinion and interest group activity’. European Journal of Political Research 53(2): 250–68. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. and Gross, V. (2015) ‘Biased access? Exploring selection to advisory committees’. European Political Science Review 7(3): 343–72. doi: 10.1017/S1755773914000228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., Mäder, L.K. and Reher, S. (2018) ‘With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion in advocacy success’, Comparative Political Studies 51(2): 139–64. doi: 10.1177/0010414017695334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. A realist’s view of democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K.L. (1984) ‘What accent the heavenly chorus? Political equality and the american pressure system’, The Journal of Politics 46(4): 1006–32. doi: 10.2307/2131240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. (2010) ‘Who sings in the heavenly chorus? The shape of the organized interest system’, in L.S. Maisel, J.M. Berry and G.C. Edwards III (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 425–450.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K.L. and Tierney, J.T. (1986) Organized Interests and American Democracy, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Siaroff, A. (1999) ‘Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: meaning and measurement’, European Journal of Political Research 36(2): 175–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.A. (2000) American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truman, D.B. (1951) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion, New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar