Neofunctionalism and EU external policy integration: the case of capacity building in support of security and development (CBSD)

References

• Ansorg, N. and Haastrup, T. (2018) ‘Gender and the EU’s support for security sector reform in fragile contexts’, Journal of Common Market Studies 56(5): 1127–1143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D. and Pedersen, R. B. (2013) ‘Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines’, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. and Niemann, A. (2018) ‘From neo-functional peace to a logic of spillover in EU external policy: a response to Visoka and Doyle’, Journal of Common Market Studies 56(2): 420–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. and Weiss, M. (2013) ‘If you can’t beat me, join me! How the commission pushed and pulled member states into legislative defence procurement’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(8): 1120–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M.H. and Riddervold, M. (2015) ‘The unexpected negotiator at the table: how the European Commission’s expertise informs intergovernmental EU policies’, Politics and Governance 3(1): 61–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONCORD (2018) ‘Security Aid. Fostering Development, or serving European donors’ national interest?’ AidWatch 2018, European NGO confederation for relief and development.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2014) ‘Council conclusions on security and defence’, Foreign Affairs (Defence) Council Meeting, 18 November, Brussels: Council of the EU, available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/145824.pdf (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Damro, C. (2012) ‘Market power Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(5): 682–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.646779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damro, C., Gstöhl, S. and Schunz, S. (eds.) (2018) The European Union’s Evolving External Engagement: Towards New Sectoral Diplomacies?, Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danjean, A. (2017) ‘Speech in the European parliament plenary debate’, 29 November; video documentation, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ep-live/en/plenary/video?debate=1511982712141&streamingLanguage=en (accessed 17 July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Delputte, S. and Orbie, J. (2018) ‘EU development Policy’, in H. Heinelt and S. Münch (eds.), Handbook of European Policies: Interpretive Approaches to the EU, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 288–305.
   Google Scholar
• EPLO (2017) ‘Open letter to the members of the committee on foreign affairs of the European Parliament’, 28 April, Brussels, available at http://eplo.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/EPLO_Letter-to-AFET-MEPs-Re.-CBSD.pdf (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016) ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending regulation (EU) No 230/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace (COM (2016) 447 final)’, 05 July, Strasbourg, available at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/fpi/documents/key_documents/com_2016_447_f1_proposal_for_a_regulation_en_v7_p1_855656.pdf (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017) ‘Stepping up support for security and sustainable development in partner countries’, Press Release, 7 December, Brussels, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-5125_en.htm (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council establishing the neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument’, COM (2018) 460 final, 14 June 2018, Brussels: European Commission, available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/com-2018-460_en (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2013) ‘Conclusions’, EUCO 217/13, 19/20 December, Brussels: European Council Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2016) ‘Revision of the instrument contributing to stability and peace, initial appraisal of a European Commission impact assessment’, European Parliamentary Research Service, December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2017a) ‘The EU’s new approach to funding peace and security’, Briefing EU Legislation in Progress, Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2017b) ‘New ways to support peace and stability outside Europe’, Press Release, 30 November, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20171127IPR88939/new-ways-to-support-stability-and-peace-outside-the-eu (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2017c) ‘Draft Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending regulation (EU) No. 230/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace’, 2016/0207 (COD), 17 July, Strasbourg, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2017-0261+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN (accesed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2015) ‘Joint communication to the European Parliament and the Council: Capacity building in support of security and development. Enabling partners to prevent and manage crises’, JOIN(2015) 17 final, 28 April, Brussels, available at https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/joint_communication_capacity_building_in_support_of_security_and_development_-enabling_partners_to_prevent_and_manage_crises_-join2015_17_final.pdf (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2016a) ‘Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe: a global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy’, available at https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2016b) ‘Joint staff working document. Impact assessment: capacity building in support of security and development. Accompanying the document ‘Proposal for a regulation from the European Parliament and the Council amending regulation (EU) No 230/2014 on establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace’’, COM 2016, 447 final, SWD(2016) 225 final/2, 10 August, Brussels, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0225R(01&from=ET) (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2017) ‘Regulation (EU) 2017/2306 of the European Parliament and of the council of 12 December 2017 amending regulation (EU) No 230/2014 establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 355: 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, P. (2013) ‘French general urges EU to equip “impoverished” Malian army’, Reuters, 20. February, available at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mali-rebels-eu/french-general-urges-eu-to-equip-impoverished-mali-army-idUSBRE91J1B320130220 (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Furness, M. and Gänzle, S. (2017) ‘The security-development nexus in European foreign relations after Lisbon: policy coherence at last?’, Development Policy Review 35(4), 475–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-7. London: Stevens.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (1964) ‘Technocracy, pluralism and the new Europe’, in S. Graubard (ed.), A New Europe?, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 62–88.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (1970) ‘The study of regional integration: reflections on the joy and anguish of Pretheorizing’, International Organization 24(4): 606–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300017495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (2001) ‘Does constructivism subsume Neo-functionalism?’, in T. Christiansen, K.E. Jørgensen and A. Wiener (eds.), The Social Construction of Europe, London, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (2004) ‘Introduction: institutionalism or constructivism?’, in The Uniting of Europe: Politics, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, 3rd edn, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. xiii–lvi.
   Google Scholar
• Hautala, H. (2017) ‘Europe’s legal U-turn on militarising development policy’, EURACTIV Blog, 3 July, available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/development-policy/opinion/europes-legal-u-turn-on-militarising-development-policy/ (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. (1966) ‘Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation state and the core of Western Europe’, Daedalus 95(3): 862–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S. and Raube, K. (2013) ‘The security-development nexus and securitization in the EU’s policies towards developing countries’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 26(3): 556–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2013.822851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landell Mills et al. (2017) External evaluation of the instrument contributing to stability and peace (2014-mid 2017) (Final Report), available at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/fpi/documents/key-documents/icsp-mte-final-report.pdf (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Lietz, A. (2017) ‘Keine Entwicklungshilfe fürs Militär. Europäisches Parlament beschließt Verhandlungsmandat, um Instrument für Stabilität und Frieden zu erweitern’, Press Release, 11 July, available at https://www.spd-europa.de/pressemitteilungen/keine-entwicklungshilfe-fuers-militaer-3110 (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L. (1963) The Political Dynamics of European Integration, Stanford, CA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L. and Scheingold, S. (1970) Europe’s Would-Be Polity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Loevin, I. (2016) ‘How to ensure that development aid is effective’, EU Observer, 8 November, Stockholm: Opinion Piece, available at https://euobserver.com/opinion/135805 (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2001) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353
   Google Scholar
• Merket, H. (2016) The EU and the Security-Development Nexus. Bridging the Divide, Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2017) Statement at the EP plenary meeting (video documentation), 12 September, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/EN/vod.html?mode=unit&vodLanguage=EN&vodId=1505384812868# (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1993) ‘Preferences and power in the european community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. (2006) Explaining Decisions in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Ioannou, D. (2015) ‘European economic integration in times of crisis: a case of neofunctionalism?’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(2): 196–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.994021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Schmitter, P. (2009) ‘Neo-functionalism’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds), Theories of European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Speyer, J. (2018) ‘A neofunctionalist perspective on the “European refugee crisis”: the case of the European border and coast guard’, Journal of Common Market Studies 56(1): 23–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1998) ‘The path to European integration: a historical institutionalist analysis’, in W. Sandholtz and A. Stone Sweet (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M. (2016) ‘(Not) in the hands of the member states: how the European commission influences EU security and defence policies’, Journal of Common Market Studies 54(2): 353–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M. and Rosén, G. (2016) ‘Trick and treat: how the commission and the European Parliament exert influence in EU foreign and security policies’, Journal of European Integration 38(6): 687–702. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1178737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén, G. and Raube, K. (2018) ‘Influence beyond formal powers: the parlamentarisation of European Union security policy’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20(1): 69–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117747105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H. (2006) ‘What kind of power?’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 169–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardy, T. (2015) Enabling Partners to Manage Crises. From ‘Train and Equip’ to Capacity-Building, Issue Brief 18, Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.C. (2011) Making EU Foreign Policy: National Preferences, European Norms and Common Policies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991) ‘Neo-functionalism: obstinate or obsolete? A reappraisal in the light of the new dynamism of the EC’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 20(1): 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298910200010201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treaty on European Union. (2009) ‘Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union’, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012M%2FTXT (accessed July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G. and Doyle, J. (2018) ‘The promise and future of neo-functional peace: a reply to Bergmann and Niemann’, Journal of Common Market Studies 56(2): 439–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12684
   Google Scholar