Problem detection in legislative oversight: an analysis of legislative committee agendas in the UK and US

References

• Adler, E.S. and Wilkerson, J.D. (2012) Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, R.D. (1990) The Logic of Congressional Action, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balla, S.J. and Deering, C.J. (2013) ‘Police patrol and fire alarms: an empirical examination of the legislative preference for oversight’, Congress & the Presidency 40(1): 27–40. doi: 10.1080/07343469.2012.748853
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B.D., Mortensen, P.B., Nuytemans, M. and Walgrave, S. (2009) ‘Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective’, American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 602–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., Green-Pedersen,C. and Jones, B.D. (2006) ‘Comparative studies of policy Agendas’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(7): 955–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B. (1991) ‘Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems’, The Journal of Politics 53(4): 1044–74. doi: 10.2307/2131866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (2015) The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D. and MacLeod, M.C. (2000) ‘The evolution of legislative jurisdictions’, The Journal of Politics 62(2): 321–49. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D. and Wilkerson, J. (2011) ‘Comparative studies of policy dynamics’, Comparative Political Studies 44(8): 947–72. doi: 10.1177/0010414011405160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S and Jennings, W. (2014) ‘Representation, agendas and institutions’, European Journal of Political Research 53(1): 37–56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, D.W. (2011) ‘Public opinion and congressional policy’, in George C. Edwards, Frances E. Lee and Eric Schickler (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 140–154.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, R.W. and Elder, C. (1972) Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
   Google Scholar
• Enns, P. (2014) ‘The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States’, American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 857–72. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenno, R.F. (1973) Congressmen in Committees, Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, P. (1994) ‘Select committees and parliamentary scrutiny: plus Ça change’, Parliamentary Affairs 47(4): 669–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmoor, A., Larkin, P. and Kennon, A. (2009) ‘Assessing the influence of select committees in the UK: The Education and Skills Committee’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 15(1): 71–89. doi: 10.1080/13572330802666844
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., and Wlezien, C. (2011) ‘Distinguishing between most important problems and issues?’, Public Opinion Quarterly 75(3): 545–55. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B.D. and Baumgartner, F.R. (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, A. (2016) ‘Political leadership in parliament: the role of select committee chairs in the UK house of Commons’, Politics and Governance 4(2): 115–26. doi: 10.17645/pag.v4i2.573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D.C. (1997) Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, K. (1990) ‘Are congressional committees composed of preference outliers?’, The American Political Science Review 84(1): 149–63. doi: 10.2307/1963634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D.R. (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M.D., and Schwartz, T. (1984) ‘Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms’, American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165–79. doi: 10.2307/2110792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R.J. (2013) ‘Congressional oversight hearings and policy control’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(3): 349–76 doi: 10.1111/lsq.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickup, M. (2015) Introduction to Time Series Analysis, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, J.C., Jones, B.D. and Baumgartner, F.R. (1995) ‘Nonlegislative hearings and policy change in congress’, American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 383–405. doi: 10.2307/2111618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C. (2005) ‘On the salience of political issues: the problem with ‘most important problem’, Electoral Studies 24(4): 555–79. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, S. (2015) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy in the US Government: How Congress and Federal Agencies Process Information and Solve Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar