Grand theories of European integration in the twenty-first century

References

• Bartolini, S. (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. and Becker, S. (2014) ‘The unexpected winner of the crisis: the European Commission’s strengthened role in economic governance’, Journal of European Integration 36(3): 213–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, L. and de la Baume, M. (2018) ‘Hungary picks a fight in Brussels’, Politico, 26 April.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C.J., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2015) ‘The new intergovernmentalism and the study of European integration’, in C.J. Bickerton, D. Hodson and U. Puetter (eds.), The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Guérin, N., Jagdhuber, S., Rittberger, B. and Weiss, M. (2019) ‘Political (non)reform in the Euro crisis and the refugee crisis: a liberal intergovernmentalist explanation’, Journal of European Public Policy 26(2): 246–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. and Kelemen, D.R. (2017) ‘Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 24(3): 321–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. (2016) ‘From EU governance of the crisis to crisis of EU governance: regulatory failure, redistributive conflict and eurosceptic publics’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (Annual Review): 8–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2018) ‘From the Euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R.J. (2018) Political Realignment: Economics, Culture and Electoral Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennison, J. and Geddes, A. (2018) ‘Brexit and the perils of ‘Europeanised’ migration’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(8): 1137–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K.W. (1966) Nationalism and Social Communication, Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C.E. (2018) ‘The cosmopolitan-parochial divide: changing patterns of party and electoral competition in the Netherlands and beyond’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(11): 1541–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., Leupold, A. and Schmidtke, H. (2016) ‘The differentiated politicisation of European governance’, West European Politics 39(1): 1–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez-Medrano, J. (2003) Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. (2005) ‘The role of agency in cleavage formation’, European Journal of Political Research 44(5): 697–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (1999) ‘Europe: a new cleavage?’, in G. Evans and P. Norris (eds.), Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective, London: Sage, pp. 207–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, A. (2018) ‘Taking back control: the political implications of Brexit’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(8): 1215–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P. and Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018) ‘From market integration to core state powers: the Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis and integration theory’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(1): 178–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (2016) ‘Conclusions: the postfunctionalists were (almost) right’, in S. Hutter, E. Grande and H. Kriesi (eds.), Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–300.
   Google Scholar
• Greskovits, B. (2017) ‘Rebuilding the Hungarian right through civil organization and contention: the civic circles movement’, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2017/37.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (1958/2004) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (1999) ‘Dimensions and alignments in European Union Politics: cognitive constraints and partisan responses’, European Journal of Political Research 35(1): 69–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2018) ‘When optimism fails: liberal intergovernmentalism and citizen representation’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1595–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B. (2016) ‘The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1259–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B., Leeper, T. and Tilley, J. (2018) Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of Brexit, Boston: APSA.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B. and Tilley, J. (2016) ‘Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the Euro crisis’, West European Politics 39(5): 971–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2019) ‘The European Union in disequilibrium. New intergovernmentalism, postfunctionalism and integration theory in the post-Maastricht period’, Journal of European Public Policy 26(8): 1153–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. (1966) ‘Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe’, Daedalus 95(3): 862–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Lenz, T. and Marks, G. (2019) A Theory of International Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018a) ‘Cleavage theory and Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan and the transnational cleavage’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018b) ‘Re-engaging grand theory: European integration in the 21st century’, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2018/43.
   Google Scholar
• Handelsblatt (2018) https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/viktor-orbn-zu-besuch-bei-der-csu-seehofers-grenzschutzkapitaen/20817488.html?ticket=ST-1210391-JrwA5KuDXttxwvGtb17D-ap1.
   Google Scholar
• SHZ (2018) https://www.shz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/ich-werde-alles-dafuer-tun-horst-seehofer-will-eine-grosse-koalition-id18724921.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (eds) (2016) Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S. and Kriesi, H. (2018) ‘Restructuring the party systems in North-Western Europe: six countries compared’, EGGP conference, EUI.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. (2015) ‘Europe’s new German problem: the timing of politics and the politics of timing’, in M. Matthijs and M. Blyth (eds.), The Future of the Euro, Oxford: OUP, pp. 187–209.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.D. and Snaith, H. (2016) ‘When politics prevails: the political economy of Brexit’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1302–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (2018) ‘Towards a theory of disintegration’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(3): 440–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E., Kelemen, R.D. and Meunier, S. (2016) ‘Failing forward? The Euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration’, Comparative Political Studies 49(7): 1010–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2017) ‘Europe’s other democratic deficit: national authoritarianism in Europe’s democratic union’, Government and Opposition 52(2): 211–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleider, H. and Stoeckel, F. (2019) ‘The politics of international redistribution: explaining public support for fiscal transfers in the EU’, European Journal of Political Research 58(1): 4–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., et al. (2006) ‘Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared’, European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. (2016) ‘Europe’s union in crisis: tested and contested’, West European Politics 39(5): 915–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengyel, G. and Ilonszki, G. (2010) ‘Hungary: between consolidated and simulated democracy’, in H. Best and J. Higley (eds.), Democratic Elitism, Leiden: Brill, pp. 150–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967) ‘Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction’, in S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, Toronto: Free Press, pp. 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. (2012) ‘Europe and its empires: from Rome to the European Union*’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G., Attewell, D., Rovny, J. and Hooghe, L. (2018) ‘The social bases of the transnational cleavage in Europe’, unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. (2018) ‘Authority under construction: the European Union in comparative political perspective’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1510–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, A.S. (1992) The European Rescue of the Nation-State, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe, Ithaca: Cornell.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2016) ‘The great Brexit kabuki – a masterclass in political theatre’, Financial Times, 8 April.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2009) ‘Liberal intergovernmentalism’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory, Oxford: OUP, pp. 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Speyer, J. (2018) ‘A neofunctionalist perspective on the European refugee crisis: the case of the European border and coast guard’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(1): 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Zaun, N. (2018) ‘EU refugee policies and politics in times of crisis: theoretical and empirical perspectives’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(1): 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996) ‘The path to European integration: a historical institutionalist analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, J. et al. (2017) ‘Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill expert survey data’, Research & Politics 4(1): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres, Ithaca: Cornell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (ed) (2015) European Public Spheres: Politics is Back, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rokkan, S. (1970) Citizens, Parties, Elections, Oslo:Universitaetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Rovny, J. (2015) ‘Riker and Rokkan: remarks on the strategy and structure of party competition’, Party Politics 21(6): 912–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. (2016) ‘Politicisation and integration through law: whither integration theory?’ West European Politics 39(5): 933–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2015) ‘Liberal intergovernmentalism and the Euro area crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(2): 177–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2018) ‘European integration (theory) in times of crisis. A comparison of the euro and Schengen crises’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(7): 969–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2014) ‘Speaking to the markets or to the people? A discursive institutionalist analysis of the EU’s sovereign debt crisis’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 16: 188–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. (1969) ‘Three neo-functional hypotheses about European integration’, International Organization 3(3): 161–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. (2005) ‘Ernst B. Haas and the legacy of neofunctionalism’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 255–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scipioni, M. (2018) ‘Failing forward in EU migration policy? EU integration after the 2015 asylum and migration crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(9): 1357–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2017) ‘Political safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU: the limits of material sanctions and the scope of social pressure’, Journal of European Public Policy 24(3): 337–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaventa, E. (2016) The Interpretation of Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Dilemma of Stricter or Broader Application of the Charter to National Measures, Strasbourg: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckel, F. and Kuhn, T. (2018) ‘Mobilizing citizens for costly policies: the conditional effect of party cues on support for international bailouts in the European Union’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(2): 446–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teney, C., Lacewell, O.P. and De Wilde, P. (2014) ‘Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: attitudes and ideologies’, European Political Science Review 6(4): 575–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóka, G. and Popa, S.B. (2013) ‘Hungary’, in S. Berglund, J. Ekman and F.H. Aarebrot (eds), Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 291–338.
   Google Scholar
• Van Elsas, E.J., Hakhverdian, A. and van der Brug, W. (2016) ‘United against a common foe? The nature and origins of Euroscepticism among left-wing and right-wing citizens’, West European Politics 39(6): 1181–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollaard, H. (2014) ‘Explaining European disintegration’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1142–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, D. (2019) ‘Trends in European political (dis)integration: postfunctionalist and other explanations’, Journal of European Public Policy 26(8): 1134–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. (2018) ‘The EU's top judges take on Poland’, The Economist, 26 April.
   Google Scholar