The European Union in disequilibrium: new intergovernmentalism, postfunctionalism and integration theory in the post-Maastricht period

References

• Arrow, K.J. (1959) ‘Toward a theory of price adjustment’, in B.F. Haley et al. (eds.), The Allocation of Economic Resources. Essays in Honor of Bernard Francis Haley, Stanford: Standford University Press, pp. 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Batory, A. (2016) ‘Defying the Commission: creative compliance and respect for the rule of law in the EU’, Public Administration 94(3): 685–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C.J., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2015a) ‘The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht era’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4): 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C.J., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2015b) ‘The new intergovernmentalism and the study of European integration’, in C.J. Bickerton, D. Hodson and U. Puetter (eds.), The new Intergovernmentalism. States, Supranational Actors, and European Politics in the Post-Maastricht era, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. (2000) ‘What do we know about macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell did not?’, De Economist 148(5): 571–601.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, R. (2018) ‘Far-right AfD overtakes Social Democrats for first time in German poll’, Financial Times, 9 July.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S. (2015) ‘Understanding the new intergovernmentalism: Pre- and post-Maastricht EU studies’, in C.J. Bickerton, D. Hodson and U. Puetter (eds.), The new Intergovernmentalism. States, Supranational Actors, and European Politics in the Post-Maastricht era, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–303.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, A. and Buckley, N. (2017) ‘Hungary defies German call to accept EU refugee ruling’, Financial Times, 13 September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2006) ‘Leader’s speech’, Bournemouth, 1 October. Full text available at http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=314
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G. and Kelemen, R.D. (2007) ‘The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism’, World Politics 59(3): 341–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulus, L. (2017) ‘Hungary’s ‘Let’s stop Brussels!’ survey’, Politico, 1 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. and John, A. (1988) ‘Coordinating coordination Failures in Keynesian Models’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(3): 441–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, O. (2017) ‘Is the French presidential election a referendum on EU membership?’, CEPOB - College of Europe Policy Brief 3.17, Bruges: College of Europe, available at https://www.coleurope.eu/system/files_force/research-paper/costa_cepob-3-17_en_final_lh.pdf?download=1 (accessed May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., Fernandez, J., Kouki, H. and Mosca, L. (2017) Movement Parties Against Austerity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Welle (2018) ‘Sophia – Mittelmeer-Mission ohne Zukunft’, 30 August, available at https://www.dw.com/de/sophia-mittelmeer-mission-ohne-zukunft/a-45296297 (accessed August 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1956) ‘Limits of the equilibrium model in social research’, Behavioral Science 1(2): 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965) A Framework for Political Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J. (1972) ‘Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism’, in T.F. Schopf (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, San Francisco: Cooper & Co, pp. 82–115.
   Google Scholar
• EPP (2018) ‘Protecting EU values and safeguarding democracy’, Emergency Resolution adopted at the EPP Congress, Helsinki, 7–8 November 2018. available at https://www.epp.eu/papers/protecting-eu-values-and-safeguarding-democracy/ (accessed 15 December 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Esslinger, D. and Ulrich, S. (2018) ‘Schicksalsjahr für den Kontinent’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 March.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017) ‘“Stop Brussels”: European Commission responds to Hungarian national consultation’, 27 April, Brussels: European Commission, available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/stop-brussels-european-commission-responds-hungarian-national-consultation_en (accessed May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P. (2016) ‘The one EU leader hailing a Trump counter-revolution’, The Daily Telegraph, 12 November.
   Google Scholar
• Gougou, F. and Persico, S. (2017) ‘A new party system in the making? The 2017 French presidential election’, French Politics 15(3): 303–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassel, F. (2017) ‘Amtliche Verunglimpfung’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 19 August.
   Google Scholar
• Henley, J. (2018) ‘Europe’s unprecedented challenge from the authoritarians in the east’, The Guardian, 27 December.
   Google Scholar
• Herszenhorn, D.M. and Barigazzi, J. (2016) ‘Matteo Renzi’s not-so-secret weapon: Euro-bashing’, Politico, Brussels, 28 September, available at https://www.politico.eu/article/matteo-renzi-not-so-secret-weapon-euro-bashing constitution-referendum-italy/ (accessed 4 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (2018) The Transformation of EU Treaty Making: The Rise of Parliaments, Referendums and Courts Since 1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2018) ‘Studying Europe after the fall: four thoughts on post-EU studies’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(3): 465–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2019) ‘Grand theories of European integration in the twenty first century’, Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungarian Government (2018) ‘Soros network also intervenes in EU reports on Hungary’, Budapest, 28 March, available at http://www.kormany.hu/en/prime-minister-s-office/news/soros-network-also-intervenes-in-eu-reports-on-hungary (accessed 4 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E., Kelemen, R.D. and Meunier, S. (2016) ‘Failing forward? The euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration’, Comparative Political Studies 49(7): 1010–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2007) ‘Built to last? The durability of EU federalism’, in S. Meunier and K.R. McNamara (eds.), Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2017) ‘Europe’s other democratic deficit: national authoritarianism in Europe’s democratic union’, Government and Opposition 52(2): 211–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, M. and Pollack, M. (2018) ‘Liberal intergovernmentalism and its critics’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1493–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, D. (2017) ‘A controversial campaign: François Fillon and the decline of the centre-right in the 2017 presidential elections’, Modern & Contemporary France 25(4): 391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L.N. and Scheingold, S.A. (1970) Europe's Would-be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community, Upper Sadle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mattli, W. and Stone Sweet, A. (2012) ‘Regional integration and the evolution of the European polity: On the fiftieth anniversary of the journal of common market studies’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50(s1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, M.J. (2017) ‘Contagious Euroscepticism: The impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration’, Party Politics 23(4): 413–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgate, M. (1994) ‘Equilibrium: development of the concept’, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 228–236.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2005) ‘The European constitutional compromise and the neofunctionalist legacy’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 349–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2008) ‘The European constitutional settlement’, The World Economy 31: 158–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2012) ‘Europe after the crisis: how to sustain a common currency’, Foreign Affairs (2012): 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2018) ‘Preferences, power and institutions in 21st-century Europe’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1648–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2013) ‘Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what?’, European Journal of Political Research 52(1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Ioannou, D. (2015) ‘European economic integration in times of crisis: a case of neofunctionalism?’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(2): 196–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Schmitter, P.C. (2009), ‘Neofunctionalism’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory, 2nd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Orbán, V. (2014) Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp, Budapest: Government of Hungary. The Prime Minister, available at http://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-orban-s-speech-at-the-25th-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. and Matthijs, M. (2015) ‘European integration past, present, and future: moving forward through crisis?’, in M. Matthijs and M. Blyth (eds.), The Future of the Euro, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 210–232.
   Google Scholar
• Pech, L. and Scheppele, K.L. (2017) ‘Illiberalism within: rule of law backsliding in the EU’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 19: 3–47.
   Google Scholar
• Politi, J. (2018) ‘League/five star want return to “pre-Maastricht” era’, Financial Times, 16 May.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. (2015) ‘Theorizing EU policy-making’ in H. Wallace, M. Pollack and A. Young (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 12–46.
   Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. (2012) ‘Europe's deliberative intergovernmentalism - the role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. (2014) The European Council and the Council. New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutte, M. (2018) ‘Speech by the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, at the Bertelsmann Stiftung, Berlin’, 2 March, The Hague: Government of the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W. and Sweet Stone, A. (2012) ‘Neo-functionalism and supranational governance’, in E. Jones, A. Menon and S. Weatherill (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. (2014) Theoretical Approaches to European Integration, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K. (1996) ‘Sterile debates and dubious generalisations: European integration theory tested by telecommunications and electricity’, Journal of Public Policy 16(3): 233–271.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2018) ‘Rethinking EU governance: from ‘old’ to ‘new’ approaches to who steers integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies (early view): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. (2009) ‘On the way to a post-functionalist theory of European integration’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 211–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbeis, M. (2018) Law Rules!, VerfBlog, 24 November 2018, https://verfassungsblog.de/law-rules/, https://doi.org/10.17176/20181130-084844-0.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A. and Sandholtz, W. (1998) ‘Integration, supranational governance, and the institutionalization of the European polity’, in W. Sandholtz and A. Stone Sweet (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W. and Fligstein, N. (eds.) (2001) The Institutionalization of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A. and Taggart, P. (2008) Opposing Europe?: The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, Volume 2: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. and Szczerbiak. (2013) ‘Coming in from the cold? Euroscepticism, government participation and party positions on Europe’, Journal of Common Market Studies 51(1): 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarquini, A. (2016) ‘Wie Kaczynski mit Orbán die EU retten will’, Die Welt, 9 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vollaard, H. (2014) ‘Explaining European disintegration’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1142–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar