When shifting backfires: the electoral consequences of responding to niche party EU positions

References

• Abou-Chadi, T. (2016) ‘Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts – how green and far-right parties differ in their impact’, British Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 417–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Chadi, T. and Wagner, M. (2019) ‘The electoral appeal of party strategies in postindustrial societies: when can the mainstream left succeed?’, The Journal of Politics, [pre-print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. (2012) ‘Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: theoretical results and empirical evidence’, Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L. and Glasgow, G. (2006) ‘Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998’, American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009) ‘Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 39: 825–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stability of European Electorates, 1885–1985, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bischof, D. (2017) ‘Towards a renewal of the niche party concept: parties, market shares and condensed offers’, Party Politics 23 (3): 220–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, N. and Golder, M. (2013) ‘Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011’, Electoral Studies 32 (2): 360–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. and Golder, M. (2006) ‘Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses’, Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1983) ‘Party competition – selective emphasis or direct Confrontation?’ in H. Daalder and P. Mair (eds), Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, London: Sage, pp. 267–306.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E.G. and Stimson, J.A. (1986) ‘On the structure and sequence of issue evolution’, The American Political Science Review 80 (3): 901–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C.E. (2007) ‘Sleeping giant: fact or fairytale?: how European integration affects national elections’, European Union Politics 8 (3): 363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C.E. (2010) ‘EU issue voting: asset or liability?: how European integration affects parties’ electoral fortunes’, European Union Politics 11 (1): 89–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C.E. and Edwards, E.E. (2009) ‘Taking Europe to its extremes: extremist parties and public Euroscepticism’, Party Politics 15 (1): 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C.E. and Hobolt, S.B. (2012) ‘When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics 13 (2): 246–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wilde, P. and Trenz, H.-J. (2012) ‘Denouncing European integration: Euroscepticism as polity contestation’, European Journal of Social Theory 15 (4): 537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2019) Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): information on parties, elections and cabinetsin modern democracies. Development version.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L., de Vries, C.E., Steenbergen, M.R. and Edwards, E. (2010) ‘Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?’ Party Politics 17 (3): 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Vazquez, P. (2019) ‘The credibility of party policy rhetoric. Survey experimental evidence’, The Journal of Politics 81 (1): 309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M.N. and Wlezien, C. (1997) ‘The responsive public. Issue salience, policy change, and preferences for European unification’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 9 (3): 347–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, E. and Hutter, S. (2016) ‘The politicisation of Europe in public debates on major integration steps’, in S. Hutter, E. Grande and H. Kriesi (eds.), Politicising Europe. Integration and mass politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Guinaudeau, I. and Persico, S. (2013) ‘EU politicization through the lens of salience’, French Politics 11 (2): 143–168.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., Hobolt, S.B. and Wratil, C. (2017) ‘Government responsiveness in the European Union: evidence from council voting’, Comparative Political Studies 50 (6): 850–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997) Political Parties in the European Union, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018) ‘Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage’, Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 109–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karreth, J., Polk, J. and Allen, C.S. (2012) ‘Catchall or catch and release? The electoral consequences of social democratic parties’ march to the middle in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies 46 (7): 791–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2006) ‘Does economics still matter? Econometrics and the vote’, Journal of Politics 68 (1): 208–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov, S. and Laver, M. (2011) ‘Scaling policy preferences from coded political Texts’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 123–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B.M. (2005) ‘Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success’, American Political Science Review 99 (03): 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B.M. (2008) Party competition Between unequals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, M.J. (2017) ‘Contagious Euroscepticism? The impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration’, Party Politics 23 (4): 413–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, M.J. and Rauh, C. (2016) ‘Has Eurosceptic mobilization become more contagious? Comparing the 2009 and 2014 European parliament elections in the Netherlands and France’, Politics and Governance 4 (1): 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, M.J. and van der Veer, H. (2019) ‘Issue competition without electoral incentives? A study of issue emphasis in the European parliament’, The Journal of Politics, [pre-print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J.R. (1996) ‘Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study’, American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2018) ‘EU politicization and policy initiatives of the European Commission: the case of consumer policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 0 (0): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2014) ‘European integration in the Euro crisis: the limits of postfunctionalism’, Journal of European Integration 36 (3): 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, J.-J., Hobolt, S.B. and de Vries, C.E. (2014) ‘Going green: explaining issue competition on the environment’, European Journal of Political Research 53 (2): 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, J.-J. and Williams, C. (2017) ‘It takes two : how Eurosceptic public opinion and party divisions influence party positions’, West European Politics 40 (4): 741–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M.R., Edwards, E.E. and de Vries, C.E. (2007) ‘Who’s cueing whom?: mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration’, European Union Politics 8 (1): 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A. and Taggart, P. (2000) ‘Opposing Europe: party systems and opposition to the Union, the Euro and Europeanisation’, SEI Working Papers (36): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tomz, M. and Van Houweling, R.P. (2016) Political Repositioning: A Conjoint Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Brug, W. and Van Spanje, J. (2009) ‘Immigration, Europe and the “new” cultural dimension’, European Journal of Political Research 48 (3): 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (2004) ‘Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds), European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T.W.G., van Elsas, E., Lubbe, R. and van der Brug, W. (2015) ‘Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010)’, Party Politics 21 (1): 100–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Spanje, J. (2010) ‘‘Contagious parties: anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe’’, Party Politics 16 (5): 563–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., et al. (2017) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2017b, available at https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2017b.
   Google Scholar
• Vrânceanu, A. (2019) ‘The impact of contextual factors on party responsiveness regarding immigration issues’, Party Politics 25 (4): 583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2012) ‘Defining and measuring niche parties’, Party Politics 18 (6): 845–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. and Meyer, T.M. (2017) ‘The radical right as niche parties? The ideological landscape of party systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014’, Political Studies 65 (1): 84–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. and Ishiyama, J. (2018) ‘Responding to the left: the effect of far-left parties on mainstream party Euroskepticism’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 0 (0): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. and Spoon, J.-J. (2015) ‘Differentiated party response: The effect of Euroskeptic public opinion on party positions’, European Union Politics 16 (2): 176–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar