References
- Ansell, B. (2014) ‘The political economy of ownership: housing markets and the welfare state’, American Political Science Review 108(2): 383–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000045
- Ballard-Rosa, C., Malik, M., Rickard, S. and Scheve, K.F. (2017) ‘The economic origins of authoritarian values: evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom’, available at https://inequality.hks.harvard.edu/files/inequality/files/scheve17.pdf.
- Chwieroth, J.M. and Walter, A. (2019) The Wealth Effect: How the Great Expectations of the Middle Class Have Changed the Politics of Banking Crises, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Colgan, J.D. and Keohane, R.O. (2017) ‘The liberal order is rigged: fix it now or watch it wither’, Foreign Affairs 96: 36–44.
- Copelovitch, M. (2018) ‘“Same as it ever was”: the permanent crisis of the liberal world order’, Paper prepared for the second “Challenges to the Contemporary World Order” workshop, Vitznau, 26–27 October.
- Copelovitch, M., Hobolt, S.B. and Walter, S. (this issue) ‘The liberal order in crisis: systemic implications’, Journal of European Public Policy.
- Cramer, K.J. (2016) The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Ehrlich, S. and Maestas, C. (2010) ‘Risk orientation, risk exposure, and policy opinions: the case of free trade’, Political Psychology 31(5): 657–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00774.x
- Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. and Hofmann, S. (this issue) ‘Of the contemporary global order, crisis, and change’, Journal of European Public Policy.
- Fernández-Albertos, J. and Kuo, A. (2016) ‘Economic hardship and policy preferences in the Eurozone periphery: evidence from Spain’, Comparative Political Studies 49(7): 874–906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016633224
- Goodman, S.W. and Schimmelfennig, F. (this issue) ‘Migration: a step too far for the liberal international order?’, Journal of European Public Policy.
- Guisinger, A. (2017) American Opinion on Trade: Preferences Without Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Hobolt, S.B. (2016) ‘The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent’, Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1259–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
- Hobolt, S.B. and de Vries, C.E. (2016) ‘Turning against the Union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections’, Electoral Studies 44: 504–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.006
- Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018) ‘Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
- Hopkin, J. and Blyth, M. (2019) ‘The global economics of European populism: growth regimes and party system change in Europe’, Government and Opposition 54(2): 193–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.43
- Ikenberry, G.J. (2018) ‘The end of liberal international order?’, International Affairs 94(1): 7–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
- Kuk, J.S., Seligsohn, D. and Zhang, J. (2018) ‘The partisan divide in U.S. congressional communications after the China shock’, 21st Century China Center Research Paper No. 2018-03, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3218738.
- McNamara, K.R. (2017) ‘Constructing economic interests: geography, culture, & the liberal international order’, Prepared for “Understanding Challenges to the Contemporary Global Order”, Filzbach, Switzerland, 6–7 October, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3057049.
- Mosley, L. (2003) Global Capital and National Governments, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Mosley, L. (2017). ‘Still afraid of footloose finance? Exit and voice in contemporary globalization’, Prepared for “Understanding Challenges to the Contemporary Global Order”, Filzbach, Switzerland, 6–7 October, available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=3058317.
- Owen, E. and Johnston, N.P. (2017) ‘Occupation and the political economy of trade: job routineness, offshorability, and protectionist sentiment’, International Organization 71(4): 665–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000339
- Ruggie, J. (1982) ‘International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order’, International Organization 36(2): 379–415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
- Scheve, K.F. and Slaughter, M.J. (2001) ‘What determines individual trade-policy preferences?’, Journal of International Economics 54(2): 267–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00094-5
- Swank, D. (2013) Comparative Political Parties Dataset: Electoral, Legislative, and Government Strength of Political Parties by Ideological Group in 21 Capitalist Democracies, 1950-2011, Milwaukee: Department of Political Science, Marquette University.
- Walter, S. (2017a) ‘The Brexit referendum and the mass politics of disintegration’, International History and Politics (IHAP) Newsletter 2(1): 9–11.
- Walter, S. (2017b) ‘Globalization and the demand-side of politics. How globalization shapes labor-market risk perceptions and policy preferences’, Political Science Research and Methods 5(1): 55–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.64
- Walter, S. (2018). ‘Disintegration challenges to the liberal world order’, Prepared for “Understanding Challenges to the Contemporary Global Order II”, Vitznau, Switzerland, 26–27 October.