Challenges to the contemporary global order. Cause for pessimism or optimism?

References

• Bearce, D.H. and Jolliff Scott, B.J. (2019) ‘Popular non-support for international organizations: How extensive and what does this represent?’, The Review of International Organizations 14 (2): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbee, J., Mosley, L., Pepinsky, T.B. and Peter Rosendorff, B. (this issue) ‘Decompensating domestically: The political economy of anti-globalism’, Journal of European Public Policy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. and Risse, T. (2018) ‘From the Euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bown, C.P. and Irwin, D.A. (2019) ‘Trump’s assault on the global trading system: And why decoupling from China will change everything’, Foreign Affairs 98: 125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, M.A. (2019) ‘Why revise? Presenting a new dataset on renegotiations in the international trade regime,’ available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3425591.
   Google Scholar
• Crasnic, L. and Palmtag, T. (2019) International Organization Death, Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Creamer, Cosette D. (2019) ‘From the WTO's Crown Jewel to its Crown of Thorns’, American Journal of International Law 113: 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine. (2017) ‘Benchmarking Brexit: How the British Decision to Leave Shapes EU Public Opinion’, Journal of Common Market Studies 55: 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C.E., Hobolt, S.B. and Walter, S. (2019) Politicizing International Relations: The Mass Public and International Cooperation. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. (2018) ‘Death of International Organizations. The Organizational Ecology of Intergovernmental Organizations, 1815–2015’, The Review of International Organizations, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9340-5.
   Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. and Hofmann, S. (this issue) ‘Of the contemporary global order, crisis, and change’, Journal of European Public Policy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, S.W. and Schimmelfennig, F. (this issue) ‘Migration: a step too far for the liberal international order?’, Journal of European Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2018) ‘Life, death, or zombie? The vitality of international organizations’, International Studies Quarterly 62 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B. (2009) Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B. and De Vries, C.E. (2016) ‘Public support for European integration’, Annual Review of Political Science 19: 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018) ‘‘Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, rokkan, and the transnational cleavage.’’, Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 109–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, L., Pelc, K.J. and Wellhausen, R.L. (2019) ‘How a retreat from global economic governance may empower business interests’, The Journal of Politics 81 (2): 731–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E., Kelemen, R.D. and Meunier, S. (2016) ‘Failing forward? The Euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration’, Comparative Political Studies 49 (7): 1010–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2017) ‘‘Europe’s other democratic deficit: national authoritarianism in Europe’s democratic union.’’, Government and Opposition 52 (2): 211–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, Charles P. (1973) The World in Depression, 1929–1939, Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2018) ‘An authoritarian turn in Europe and European studies?’, Journal of European Public Policy 25 (3): 452–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeds, B.A. and Savun, B. (2007) ‘Terminating alliances: Why do states abrogate agreements?’, Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1118–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkus, L., Deutschmann, E. and Delhey, J. (2019) ‘A Trump effect on the EU’s popularity? The US presidential election as a natural experiment’, Perspectives on Politics 17 (2): 399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Q. and Spilker, G. (2019) ‘The Elephant in the negotiation room: PTAs through the eyes of citizens’, in G. Spilker, M. Elsig and M. Hahn (eds.), The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance: World Trade Forum, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–47.
   Google Scholar
• Nowrot, K. (2016) ‘Termination and renegotiation of international investment agreements in: Hindelang S’, Shifting Paradigms in International Investment law, 227–265.
   Google Scholar
• Scicluna, N. (2019) ‘Integration-through-Crisis: The triumph of expediency over democratic legitimacy?’ EU Visions, available at http://www.euvisions.eu/integration-through-crisis-expediency-or-democratic-legitimacy.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, B. (2018) ‘Americans, like many in other advanced economies, not convinced of trade’s benefits.’ PEW Research Center, September.
   Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2019) ‘Populism and backlashes against international courts’ Perspectives on Politics: 1–16. doi:10.1017/S1537592719000975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Borzyskowski, I. and Vabulas, F. (2019) ‘Hello, goodbye: when do states withdraw from international organizations?’, The Review of International Organizations 14 (2): 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09352-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Borzyskowski, Inken and Vabulas, Felicity (2019) ‘Hello, Goodbye: When Do States Withdraw From International Organizations?’, Review of International Organizations 6 (1): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2019) The Mass Politics of International Disintegration. Prepared for the “International Organization Dissolution” workshop, Zurich, Switzerland, 17–18 June, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S., Dinas, E., Jurado, I. and Konstantinidis, N. (2018) ‘Noncooperation by popular vote: Expectations, foreign intervention, and the vote in the 2015 Greek bailout referendum’, International Organization 72 (4): 969–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar