Government Euroscepticism and differentiated integration

References

• Bailer, S., Mattila, M. and Schneider, G. (2015) ‘Money makes the EU go round: The objective foundations of conflict in the council of ministers’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (3): 437–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M. and Vachudova, M. (2015) 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Bardi, L., Bartolini, S. and Trechsel, A.H. (2014) ‘Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics’, West European Politics 37 (2): 235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, T. (2000) ‘The European union as the next step of delegation and accountability’, European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bølstad, J. (2015) ‘Dynamics of European integration: public opinion in the core and periphery’, European Union Politics 16 (1): 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C.E. (2007) ‘Sleeping giant: fact or fairytale?: How European integration affects national elections’, European Union Politics 8 (3): 363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C.E. and Edwards, E.E. (2009) ‘Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public Euroscepticism’, Party Politics 15 (1): 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C.E. and Hobolt, S.B. (2012) ‘When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics 13 (2): 246–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P. and Jachtenfuchs, M. (2014) ‘Introduction: beyond market regulation. Analysing the European integration of core state powers’, in P. Genschel and M. Jachtenfuchs (eds), Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., Hobolt, S.B. and Wratil, C. (2017) ‘Government responsiveness in the European Union: evidence from council voting’, Comparative Political Studies 50 (6): 850–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B. and de Vries, C.E. (2016) ‘Public support for European integration’, Annual Review of Political Science 19 (1): 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S.B. and Tilley, J. (2014) ‘‘Who’s in charge?: How voters attribute responsibility in the European Union’’, Comparative Political Studies 47 (6): 795–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2019) ‘The European Union in disequilibrium: new intergovernmentalism, postfunctionalism and integration theory in the post-Maastricht period’, Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1153–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005) ‘Calculation, community and cues: public opinion on European integration’, European Union Politics 6 (4): 419–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A Postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39 (01): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., Grande, E. and Kriesi, H. (2016) Politicising Europe. Integration and Mass Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hvidsten, A.H. and Hovi, J. (2015) ‘Why no twin-track Europe? Unity, discontent, and differentiation in European integration’, European Union Politics 16 (1): 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölliker, A. (2001) ‘Bringing together or driving apart the union? towards a theory of differentiated integration’, West European Politics 24 (4): 125–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C., Reh, C. and Bressanelli, E. (2018) ‘When politics prevails: parties, elections and loyalty in the European parliament: parties, elections and loyalty in the European Parliament’, European Journal of Political Research 57 (3): 563–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A. (1996) Making and Breaking Governments, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, M.J. (2017) ‘Contagious Euroscepticism: The impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration’, Party Politics 23 (4): 413–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plümper, T. and Schneider, C.J. (2007) ‘Discriminatory European union membership and the redistribution of enlargement gains’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (4): 568–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, J., et al. (2017) ‘Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 chapel hill expert survey data’, Research & Politics 4 (1): 2053168016686915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, L. (1999) ‘Measuring party orientations towards European integration: results from an expert survey’, European Journal of Political Research 36 (2): 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2014) ‘European integration in the Euro crisis: The limits of Postfunctionalism’, Journal of European Integration 36 (3): 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2016) ‘Good governance and differentiated integration: Graded membership in the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research 55(4): 789–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2018) ‘Brexit: differentiated disintegration in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 25 (8): 1154–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D. and Rittberger, B. (2015) ‘The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: interdependence, politicization and differentiation’, Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 764–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. and Winzen, T. (2014) ‘Instrumental and constitutional differentiation in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (2): 354–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (2000) ‘Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies’, European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 261–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2016) ‘From capacity to sovereignty: legislative politics and differentiated integration in the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research 55 (1): 100–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2017) Constitutional Preferences and Parliamentary Reform: Explaining National Parliaments’ Adaptation to European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2016) ‘Explaining differentiation in European Union treaties’, European Union Politics 17 (4): 616–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar