Responsive withdrawal? The politics of EU agenda-setting

References

• Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., … Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. doi: 10.1177/1354068812462931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., & Kassim, H. (2016). The Commission: Boxed in and constrained, but still an engine of integration. West European Politics, 39(5), 1011–1031. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1181870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Schmidt, S. K. (2017). The European Court of Justice and its political impact. West European Politics, 40(4), 907–918. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1281652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boranbay-Akan, S., König, T., & Osnabrügge, M. (2017). The imperfect agenda-setter: Why do legislative proposals fail in the EU decision-making process? European Union Politics, 18(2), 168–187. doi: 10.1177/1465116516674338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouts, E. (2014, December 14). Withdrawal of the circular economy package: A missed opportunity for sustainable growth. Euractiv.
   Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2016). The impact of informalisation: Early agreements and voting cohesion in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 17(1), 91–113. doi: 10.1177/1465116515608704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2020). EU actors under pressure: Politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic response. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broniecki, P., Obholzer, L., & Reh, C. (2018). Against the odds: Overcoming gridlock in EU legislative decision-making. Paper presented at the ECPR-SGEU conference in Paris, June.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., & Neville, D. (2016). The European Parliament (9th ed.). London: John Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Crombez, C., & Hix, S. (2015). Legislative activity and gridlock in the European Union. British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 477–499. doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., Leupold, A., & Schmidtke, H. (2016). Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics, 39(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012, April 25). ‘The challenge of winning citizens’ trust’, Remarks by President Barroso at the Seminar Organised by European Ombudsman. MEMO/12/276.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014, December 12). ‘Work programme 2015: A new start’ (COM(2014) 910), Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015, October 27). ‘Work programme 2016: No time for business as usual’ (COM(2015) 610), Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Franchino, F. (2007). The powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018). From market integration to core state powers: The Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis and integration theory. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 178–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, E., & Kriesi, H. (2014). The restructuring of political conflict in Europe and the politicization of European integration. In T. Risse (Ed.), European public spheres: Politics is back (pp. 190–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., Hobolt, S. B., & Wratil, C. (2017). Government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council voting. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 850–876. doi: 10.1177/0010414015621077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J., & Rauh, C. (2014). Which policy for Europe? Power and conflict inside the European Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2014, July 15). ‘A new start for Europe: My agenda for jobs, growth, fairness and democratic change’, Political guidelines for the next European Commission, Opening statement in the European Parliament plenary session, Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Sagarzazu, I. (2013). Ideological congruency and decision-making speed: The effect of partisanship across European Union institutions. European Union Politics, 14(3), 388–407. doi: 10.1177/1465116512472938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Spoon, J.-J. (2015). Bringing salience back in: Explaining voting defection in the European Parliament. Party Politics, 21(4), 553–564. doi: 10.1177/1354068813487114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C., & Lodge, M. (2019). British economic regulators in an age of politicisation: From the responsible to the responsive regulatory state? Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Koop, C., Reh, C., & Bressanelli, E. (2018). When politics prevails: Parties, elections and loyalty in the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research, 57(3), 563–586. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Oztas, B. (2017). Leading the band or just playing the tune? Reassessing the agenda-setting powers of the European Commission. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1118–1150. doi: 10.1177/0010414016666839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo, N. (2018). The Commission’s power to withdraw legislative proposals and its “parliamentarisation”, between technical and political grounds. European Constitutional Law Review, 14(2), 311–331. doi: 10.1017/S1574019618000226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (2002). The European Commission: The limits of centralization and the perils of parliamentarization. Governance, 15(3), 375–392. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2019). The ‘political’ roles of the European Commission. Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 203–220. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2019.1572135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osnabrügge, M. (2015). The European Commission and the implementation of its legislative programme. European Union Politics, 16(2), 241–261. doi: 10.1177/1465116515573844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. doi: 10.2307/1956018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. (2017). Juncker’s political European Commission and an EU in crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, J., Rovny, J., Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., & Koedam, J. (2017). Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics, 4(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1177/2053168016686915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. A. (2003). The engines of European integration: Delegation, agency, and agenda-setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzano, P., Hermanin, C., & Corona, D. (2012). The power of initiative of the European Commission: A progressive erosion? Notre Europe, Study No. 89.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2019). EU politicization and policy initiatives of the European Commission: The case of consumer policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(3), 344–365. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1453528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh, C., Héritier, A., Bressanelli, E., & Koop, C. (2013). The informal politics of legislation: Explaining secluded decision making in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1112–1142. doi: 10.1177/0010414011426415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., & Zysman, J. (1989). 1992: Recasting the European bargain. World Politics, 42(1), 95–128. doi: 10.2307/2010572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santer, J. (1995, January 17). Speech to the European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. J. (2018). The responsive union: National elections and European governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, C. (2016). Public opinion in the EU institutions’ discourses on EU legitimacy from the beginnings of integration to today. Politique Européenne, 54(4), 24–56. doi: 10.3917/poeu.054.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholoniat, L. (2009). The temporal constitution of the European Commission: A timely investigation. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(2), 221–238. doi: 10.1080/13501760802589230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wratil, C. (2018). Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council negotiation positions. European Union Politics, 19(1), 52–74. doi: 10.1177/1465116517735599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar