The Court of Justice in times of politicisation: ‘law as a mask and shield’ revisited

References

• Alter, K. J. (1998a). Explaining national Court acceptance of European Court jurisprudence: A critical evaluation of theories of legal integration. In A.-M. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet, & J. H. H. Weiler (Eds.), The European Court and National Courts: Doctrine and jurisprudence. Legal change in its social context (pp. 227–252). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J. (1998b). ‘Who Are the ‘masters of the Treaty'? European governments and the European Court of Justice’. International Organization, 52(1), 121–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J., Helfer, L., & Madsen, M. R. (2018). International court authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. (2009). Of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Subsidies: European state aid control through Soft and Hard Law. West European Politics, 32(4), 719–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. (2012). With Luxembourg in mind … The Remaking of national policies in the face of ECJ jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., Heindlmaier, A., Kramer, D., Martinsen, D. S., Sampson Thierry, J., Schenk, A., & Werner, B. (2018). ECJ judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1422–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresanelli, E., Koop, C. & Reh, C. (2020) ‘EU actors under pressure: Politicisation and Depolicitisation as strategic responses’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burley, A.-M., & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the Court: A political theory of legal integration. International Organization, 47(1), 41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C. J., & Gabel, M. J. (2015). International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements. A General Theory with evidence from the European Union. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cichowski, R. A. (2004). Women's rights, the European Court, and Supranational Constitutionalism. Law & Society Review, 38(3), 489–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant, L. (2002). Justice contained: Law and politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, L., Hofmann, A., Soennecken, D., & Vanhala, L. (2018). Mobilizing European Law. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1376–1389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dederke, J. (2018, June). Media attention against all odds, or politicization as usual? Introducing Case Salience Data for CJEU Cases. Paper presented at the ECPR-SGEU conference, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• de Wilde, P., Leupold, A., & Schmidtke, H. (2016). Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics, 39(1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbrovsky, T., Petkova, B., & Van der Sluis, M. (2014). Judicial appointments: The article 255 TFEU Advisory Panel and selection Procedures in the member states. Common Market Law Review, 51(2), 455–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, J. (2002). Judicializing politics, politicizing Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 65(3), 41–68.
   Google Scholar
• Garben, S. (2017). The constitutional (Im)balance between ‘the market’ and ‘the social’ in the European Union. European Constitutional Law Review, 13(1), 23–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindlmaier, A., & Blauberger, M. (2017). Enter at your own risk: Free movement of EU citizens in practice. West European Politics, 40(6), 1198–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A. (2018). Resistance against the Court of Justice of the European Union. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(2), 258–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. (2011). Eurolegalism. The transformation of law and regulation in the European Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. (2012). The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. (2016). The Court of Justice of the European Union in the twenty-first century. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79(1), 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., & Naurin, D. (2016). Judicial independence and political uncertainty: How the risk of override Impacts on the Court of Justice of the EU. International Organization, 70(1), 377–408.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O. & Naurin, D. (2019) ‘‘Split Vision: Multidimensionality in the European Union’s legal policy Space’’, International Studies Quarterly 63(3): 492–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., Naurin, D., Derlén, M., & Lindholm, J. (2016). Speaking law to power: The strategic use of precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 50(7), 879–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, N. (2010). Service liberalization in the Enlarged EU: A race to the bottom or the Emergence of Transnational political conflict? Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1307–1327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, M. R., Cebulak, P., & Wiebusch, M. (2018). Backlash against international courts: Explaining the forms and Patterns of resistance to international courts. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(2), 197–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D. S. (2015). An ever more powerful court? The political constraints of legal integration in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D. S., Rotger, G. P. & Thierry, J. S. (2019) ‘Free movement of people and cross-border welfare in the European Union: Dynamic rules, limited outcomes’, Journal of European Social Policy 29(1): 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., & Slaughter, A.-M. (1998). Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization, 52(1), 177–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, K. T., & Stimson, J. A. (2004). The least dangerous branch revisited: New evidence on Supreme Court responsiveness to public preferences. Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1018–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. (2017). How to enforce European law? A new history of the battle over the direct effect of Directives, 1958–1987. European Law Journal, 23(3-4), 290–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, D. (2012). ‘Europeanization through Law, compliance, and Party Differences. The ECJ’s ‘rüffert’ judgment (C-346/06) and Amendments to public procurement Laws in German Federal states’. Journal of European Integration, 34(3), 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2008). ‘Der einzige Weg ist, dem EuGH nicht zu folgen’. Mitbestimmung, 54(7 + 8), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. K. (2012). Who cares about nationality? The path-dependent case law of the ECJ from goods to citizens. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 8–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikel, D. (2015). ‘Class struggle in the shadow of Luxembourg. The domestic impact of the European Court of Justice’s case law on the regulation of working conditions’. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1166–1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, E. (1981). Lawyers, judges, and the making of a transnational constitution. American Journal of International Law, 75(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A. (2010). The European Court of Justice and the judicialization of EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 5(2), 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• von Danwitz, T. (2014). The rule of law in the recent jurisprudence of the ECJ. Fordham International Law Journal, 37(5), 1311–1346.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserfallen, F. (2010). The judiciary as Legislator? How the European Court of Justice Shapes policy-making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1128–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). The Transformation of Europe. The Yale Law Journal, 100(1), 2402–2483.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. H. H. (1994). A quiet revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors. Comparative Political Studies, 26(4), 510–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. H. H. (2013). Epilogue: Judging the judges – Apology and critique. In M. Adams, H. de Waele, & J. Meeusen (Eds.), Judging Europe's Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice (pp. 235–254). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wollenschläger, F. (2011). A new fundamental freedom beyond market integration: Union citizenship and its Dynamics for shifting the economic Paradigm of European integration. European Law Journal, 17(1), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar