Governance through real-time compliance: the supranationalisation of European external energy policy

References

• Aalto, P. (2008). The EU-Russian energy dialogue: Europe’s future energy security. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Agence Europe. (2010, August 31). Commission reservation regarding Poland/Russia gas agreement.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., & Elgström, O. (2013). The EU’s role in climate change negotiations: From leader to “leadiator”. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1369–1386. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.781781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. (2003) Guarding the treaty: The compliance strategies of the European Commission. In T. Börzel & R. Cichowski (Eds.), The state of the European Union: Law, politics, and society (pp. 197–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchan, D. (2015) Energy policy: Sharp challenges and rising ambitions. In H. Wallace, M. Pollack, & A. Young (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (7th ed., pp. 344–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiti, E. (2012) The governance of compliance. In M. Cremona (Ed.), Compliance and the enforcement of EU law (pp. 31–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, L. (2012) Compliance and what EU member states make of it. In M. Cremona (Ed.), Compliance and the enforcement of EU law (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cremona, M. (ed.). (2012). Compliance and the enforcement of EU law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. (2015, August 26). The New Supranationalism. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference 2015, University of Montreal, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010, November 4). Statement on the Yamal-pipeline and the gas agreement between Poland and Russia. SPEECH/10/620, Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011, September 7). Proposal for a decision setting up an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements between Member States and third countries in the field of energy. COM(2011) 540 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016a, February 16). Report from the Commission on the application of the Decision 994/2012/EU establishing an information exchange mechanism on intergovernmental agreements between Member States and third countries in the field of energy. COM(2016) 54 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016b, February 16). Proposal for a decision on establishing an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments between Member States and third countries in the field of energy and repealing Decision No 994/2012/EU. COM(2016) 53 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017, January 19). Communication from the Commission. EU law: Better results through better application. 2017/C 18/02, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. (2018). A causal loop? The commission’s new enforcement approach in the context of non-compliance with EU law even after CJEU judgments. Journal of European Integration, 40(6), 769–784. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2018.1500565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., Oberthür, S., & Mühleck, M. (2013). European Union actorness in international institutions: Why the EU is recognized as an actor in some international institutions, but not in others. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(5), 849–865. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2014). A liberal actor in a realist world? The commission and the external dimension of the single market for energy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1452–1472. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.912251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2015a) A liberal actor in a realist world: The European Union regulatory state and the global political economy of energy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2015b). Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security. Review of International Political Economy, 22(5), 941–965. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1008547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces 1950–1957. London: Stevens.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M. (2007). On enforcement, management and persuasion: Different logics of implementation policy in the EU and the ILO. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 653–674. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00721.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2015) European external energy policy: Governance, diplomacy and sustainability. In K. E. Jorgensen, A. K. Aarstad, E. Drieskens, K. Laatikainen, & B. Tonra (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of European foreign policy (pp. 913–927). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2016). An emerging EU energy diplomacy? Discursive shifts, enduring practices. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1386–1405. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1083044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A. (2018). Is the commission levelling the playing field? Rights enforcement in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 40(6), 737–751. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2018.1501368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B., Jevnaker, T., & Thaler, P. (2019). Following, challenging, or shaping: Can third countries influence EU energy policy? Politics and Governance, 7(1), 152–164. doi: 10.17645/pag.v7i1.1853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltby, T. (2013). European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism. Energy Policy, 55, 435–444. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marhold, A.-A. (2019). Externalising Europe’s energy policy in EU free trade agreements: A cognitive dissonance between promoting sustainable development and ensuring security of supply?. Europe and the World: A Law Review, 3(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A., & Schmitter, P. (2009) Neofunctionalism. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (2nd ed., pp. 45–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. (2019). ‘Hard or soft governance? The EU’s climate and energy policy framework for 2030’. Politics and Governance, 7(1), 17–27. doi: 10.17645/pag.v7i1.1796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Groen, L. (2018). Explaining goal achievement in international negotiations: The EU and the Paris agreement on climate change. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(5), 708–727. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1291708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakalkaite, V. (2016, September). Lithuania’s strategic use of EU energy policy tools: A transformation of gas dynamics (OIES paper NG. 111).
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (2009) Governance approaches. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (2nd ed., pp. 91–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018). The governance of the European energy union: efficiency, effectiveness and acceptance of the winter package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2016). Resisting ‘new modes of governance’: An agency-centred approach. Comparative European Politics, 14(1), 53–70. doi: 10.1057/cep.2015.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, M. (2017). Mind the trend! enforcement of EU law has been moving to “Brussels”. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(9), 1348–1366. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1314538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, M., & Scholten, D. (2017). From regulation to enforcement in the EU policy cycle: A new type of functional spillover? Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(4), 925–942. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A., & Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the “Energy Union”: between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(5), 548–567. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1135100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2000). Supranational influence in EU enforcement: The ECJ and the principle of state liability. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(1), 104–121. doi: 10.1080/135017600343296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(03), 609–643. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199908
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, P. (2016). The European Commission and the European Council: Coordinated agenda setting in European energy policy. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 571–585. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1178252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, P. (2020). Shaping EU Foreign policy towards Russia: Improving coherence in external relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991). Neo-functionalism: Obstinate or obsolete? A reappraisal in the light of the new dynamism of the EC. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1177/03058298910200010201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdun, A., & Zeitlin, J. (2018). Introduction: The European semester as a new architecture of EU socioeconomic governance in theory and practice. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 137–148. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1363807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vooren, B., & Wessel, R. (2014) EU external relations law: Text, cases and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar