Loved and feared: citizens’ ambivalence towards free movement in the European Union

References

• Armingeon, K., & Lutz, P. (2019). Muddling between responsiveness and responsibility: The Swiss case of a non-implementation of a constitutional rule. Comparative European Politics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1057/s41295-019-00185-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 637–653. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. (2018). The new cleavage between mobile and immobile Europeans. In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Debating European citizenship (pp. 125–127). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baute, S., Meuleman, B., Abts, K., & Swyngendow, M. (2018). European integration as a threat to social security: Another source of Euroscepticism? European Union Politics, 19(2), 209–232. doi: 10.1177/1465116517749769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinder, S., & Markaki, Y. (2018). Public Attitudes toward EU mobility and non-EU immigration: A distinction with little difference. REMINDER working paper.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2005). Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics, 6(1), 59–82. doi: 10.1177/1465116505049608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E. (2013). Ambivalent Europeans? Public support for European integration in East and West. Government and Opposition, 48(3), 434–461. doi: 10.1017/gov.2013.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinas, E., & Fouka, V. (2018). Family history and attitudes toward outgroups: Evidence from the Syrian refugee crisis. Unpublished working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., & Walter, S. (2018). National sovereignty vs. international cooperation: Policy choices in trade-off situations. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(4), 400–422. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Standard Eurobarometer 85.2. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6694.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Brussels. (2016). Flash Eurobarometer 430 (European Union Citizenship). TNS Political & Social. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6652, doi:10.4232/1.12562.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Brussels. (2017). Eurobarometer 87.3 (2017). TNS opinion, Brussels. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6863, doi:10.4232/1.12847.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M., & Pellegata, A. (2018). Worker mobility under attack? Explaining labour market chauvinism in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1461–1480. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry, J., & Tilley, J. (2009). The macroeconomic factors conditioning the impact of identity on attitudes towards the EU. European Union Politics, 10(3), 361–379. doi: 10.1177/1465116509337829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., & Scholten, P. (2016). The politics of migration and immigration in Europe. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2010). Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 61–84. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 225–249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindlmaier, A., & Blauberger, M. (2017). Enter at your own risk: Free movement of EU citizens in practice. West European Politics, 40(6), 1198–1217. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1294383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., & Ratkovic, M. (2013). Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation. Annals of Applied Statistics, 7(1), 443–470. doi: 10.1214/12-AOAS593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentmen-Cin, C., & Erisen, C. (2017). Anti-immigration attitudes and the opposition to European integration: A critical assessment. European Union Politics, 18(1), 3–25. doi: 10.1177/1465116516680762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koikkalainen, S., & Kyle, D. (2016). Imagining mobility: The prospective cognition question in migration research. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(5), 759–776. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1111133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, D., Thierry, J. S., & Hoorenvan, F. V. (2018). Responding to free movement: Quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1501–1521. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (2015). Experiencing European integration. Transnational lives and European identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavine, H., Hu, J. W., Wagner, S. H., & Sweeney, D. (1998). The moderating influence of attitude strength on the susceptibility to context effects in attitude surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 359–373. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2013). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M., & Jaspers, E. (2011). A longitudinal study of Euroscepticism in the Netherlands: 2008 versus 1990. European Union Politics, 12(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1177/1465116510390062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, L. (2001). Immigration and the new politics of inclusion and exclusion in the European Union: The effect of elites and the EU on individual-level opinions regarding European and non-European immigrants. European Journal of Political Research, 39(1), 81–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, L. (2007). Explaining mass-level Euroscepticism: Identity, interests, and institutional distrust. Acta Politica, 42(2-3), 233–251. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, C. E., Ebrl, J.-M., Theorin, N., Lind, F., Schemer, C., Boomgaarden, H. G., … Heidenreich, T. (2018). Perceptions of the impact of immigration and attitudes towards free movement within the EU: A cross-national study. REMINDER working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Recchi, E. (2015). Mobile Europe. The theory and practice of free movement in the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2010). A community of Europeans? Transnational identities and public spheres. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhs, M. (2017). Free movement in the European Union: National institutions vs common policies? International Migration, 55(S1), 22–38. doi: 10.1111/imig.12398
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., Blauberger, M., & Martinsen, D. (2018). Free movement and equal treatment in an unequal union. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1391–1402. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciarini, P., Lanz, S., & Nai, A. (2015). Till immigration do us part? Public opinion and the dilemma between immigration control and bilateral agreements. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(2), 271–286. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2007). European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests and information. British Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 477–504. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeckel, F. (2013). Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of EU public opinion. European Union Politics, 14(1), 23–45. doi: 10.1177/1465116512460736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D., & Kortenska, E. (2015). Does immigration undermine public support for integration in the European Union? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 910–925. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K. A., Bradburn, N., & D'Andrade, R. (1989). Belief accessibility and context effects in attitude measurement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(5), 401–421. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Brug, W., & Van Spanje, J. (2009). Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 48(3), 309–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00841.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S. (2016). UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit referendum. Political Quarterly, 87(2), 219–227. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S., & Talvig, L. (2018). Opportunity or threat? Public attitudes towards EU freedom of movement. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(6), 805–823. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1497075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579–616. doi: 10.2307/2111583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar