The unintended consequences of regulatory import: the Basel Accord’s failure during the financial crisis

References

• Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (Eds.). (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2019). Competence versus control: The governor’s dilemma. Regulation & Governance, 46, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017a). Enriching the RIT framework. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 280–288. doi: 10.1177/0002716217694593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017b). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. The Annals of the American Academy of Political Science and Social Science, 670, 14–35. doi: 10.1177/0002716216688272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13–24. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J., & Raustiala, K. (2018). The rise of international regime complexity. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 329–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2005). Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I., & Saunders, A. (1997). Credit risk measurement: Developments over the last 20 years. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(11-12), 1721–1742. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00036-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732. doi: 10.1162/002081899551048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsall, S. B. (2014). The impact of issuer-pay on corporate bond rating properties: Evidence from Moody׳s and S&P’s initial adoptions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2-3), 89–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. (2010). Private regulation in the global economy: A (P)Review. Business and Politics, 3(2), 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cafaggi, F., & Renda, A. (2012). Public and private regulation: Mapping the labyrinth. Brussels: CEPS Working Document.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, G. R., Dobrev, S. D., & Swaminathan, A. (2002). Organizational processes of resource partitioning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 1–40. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. (2000). Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. Brewing industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 715–762. doi: 10.1086/318962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-Driven (NSMD) governance systems Gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15(4), 503–529. doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., & Kodres, L. (2014). The regulatory responses to the global financial crisis: Some uncomfortable questions (IMF Working Paper WP/14/46).
   Google Scholar
• Crouhy, M., Galai, D., & Mark, R. (2000). A comparative analysis of current credit risk models. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(1-2), 59–117. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00053-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2008). Two Challenges to institutionalism. In A. S. Alexandroff (Ed.), Can the World be Governed? Possibilities for Effective Multilateralism (pp. 139–159). Waterloo, Ont: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2014). JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 7. 10. 2014 — CASE C-399/12.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, G., Liu, L.-G., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). The procyclical role of rating agencies: Evidence from the East Asian crisis. Economic Notes, 28(3), 335–355. doi: 10.1111/1468-0300.00016
   Google Scholar
• Fiechter, P. (2011). Reclassification of financial assets under IAS 39: Impact on European banks’ financial statements. Accounting in Europe, 8(1), 49–67. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2011.574409
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Forum. (2009). Report of the financial stability forum on addressing procyclicality in the financial system.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, R., & McNeil, A. (2003). Dependent defaults in models of portfolio credit risk. The Journal of Risk, 6(1), 59–92. doi: 10.21314/JOR.2003.089
   Google Scholar
• Frost, C. A. (2007). Credit rating agencies in capital markets: A review of research evidence on selected criticisms of the agencies. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(3), 469–492. doi: 10.1177/0148558X0702200306
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., & Faude, B. (2014). A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 471–498. doi: 10.1007/s11558-014-9197-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018). From market integration to core state powers: The Eurozone crisis, the Refugee crisis and integration theory. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 178–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbach, R. (2015). Global Governance and Regulatory Failure: The Political Economy of Banking. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. (2018). Transnational delegation in global environmental governance: When do non-state actors govern? Regulation & Governance, 12(2), 263–276. doi: 10.1111/rego.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2006). Delegation under anarchy: States, international orgnizations, and principal-agent theory. In D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson, & M. J. Tierney (Eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 3–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfer, L. R. (2009). Regime shifting in the international intellectual property system. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 39–44. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E., & Wang, H. (2018). Limits to the BRICS’ challenge: Credit rating reform and institutional innovation in global finance. Review of International Political Economy, 25(5), 573–595. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1490330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009). The political economy of the world trading system. The WTO and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. (2008). Global financial stability report: Containing systemic risks and restoring financial soundness. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kealhofer, S. (2003). Quantifying credit risk I: Default prediction. Financial Analysts Journal, 59(1), 30–44. doi: 10.2469/faj.v59.n1.2501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. doi: 10.1162/002081801317193592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. (2016). Resilient blunderers: Credit rating fiascos and rating agencies’ institutionalized status as private authorities. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 753–770. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1127274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. (2017). Asymmetry in empowering and disempowering private intermediaries: The case of credit rating agencies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political Science and Social Science, 670, 133–151. doi: 10.1177/0002716217691459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, R. (2012). From failure to failure: The politics of international banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 19(4), 609–638. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2011.603669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2010). Did fair-value accounting contribute to the financial crisis? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 93–118. doi: 10.1257/jep.24.1.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2005a). Accountability in accounting? The politics of private rule-making in the public interest. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18(3), 399–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2005b). Global private governance: Lessons from a national model of setting standards in accounting. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68, 225–262.
   Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2011). The new global rulers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., & Woods, N. (Eds.). (2009). The politics of global regulation. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, W. (2012). Personal reflections on ten years of the IASB. Australian Accounting Review, 22(3), 225–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00184.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. C., & Keohane, R. O. (2014). Contested multilateralism. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 385–412. doi: 10.1007/s11558-014-9188-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSC. (2018). MSC fisheries standard v2.01.
   Google Scholar
• Mügge, D., & Perry, J. (2014). The flaws of fragmented financial standard setting. Politics & Society, 42(2), 194–222. doi: 10.1177/0032329213519420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mügge, D., & Stellinga, B. (2015). The unstable core of global finance: Contingent valuation and governance of international accounting standards. Regulation & Governance, 9(1), 47–62. doi: 10.1111/rego.12052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A., & Bach, D. (2014). The European Union as hardening agent: Soft law and the diffusion of global financial regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 430–452. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.882968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A., & Posner, E. (2016). Transnational feedback, soft law, and preferences in global financial regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 23(1), 123–152. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1104375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2016). The interaction of the IFRS 9 expected loss approach with supervisory rules and implications for financial stability. Accounting in Europe, 13(2), 197–227. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini, A., Morin, J.-F., & Young, O. (2013). Regime complexes: A Buzz, a boom, or a Boost for global governance? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19, 27–39. doi: 10.1163/19426720-01901003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paananen, M., Renders, A., & Shima, K. M. (2012). The Amendment of IAS 39: Determinants of reclassification behavior and capital market consequences. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 27(2), 208–235. doi: 10.1177/0148558X11409151
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, M., & Volpin, P. (2010). Credit ratings failures and policy options. Economic Policy, 25(62), 401–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2010.00245.x
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J., & Nölke, A. (2006). The political economy of international accounting standards. Review of International Political Economy, 13(4), 559–586. doi: 10.1080/09692290600839790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. (2018). Deference and Hierarchy in international regime complexes. International Organization, 72(3), 561–590. doi: 10.1017/S0020818318000164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaglia, L. (2014). The sources of European Union influence in international financial regulatory fora. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 327–345. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.882970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309. doi: 10.1017/S0020818304582036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rixen, T. (2013). Why reregulation after the crisis is feeble: Shadow banking, offshore financial centers, and jurisdictional competition. Regulation & Governance, 7(4), 435–459. doi: 10.1111/rego.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, A. O. (1995). Product Standards for Internationally Integrated Goods Markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002). Delegation to supranational institutions: Why, how, and with what consequences? West European Politics, 25(1), 23–46. doi: 10.1080/713601584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarullo, D. K. (2008). Banking on Basel: The Future of International Financial Regulation. Washington, DC: Peterson Inst. for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Thiemann, M. (2014). In the shadow of basel: How competitive politics bred the crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 21(6), 1203–1239. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2013.860612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trachtman, J. P. (2003). Addressing regulatory divergence through international standards: Financial services. In P. Sauve & A. Mattoo (Eds.), Domestic regulation and service trade liberalization (pp. 27–41). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Treacy, W. F., & Carey, M. (2000). Credit risk rating systems at large US banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(1-2), 167–201. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00056-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urpelainen, J., & van de Graaf, T. (2015). Your place or Mine? Institutional capture and the creation of overlapping international institutions. British Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 799–827. doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, H. (2014). Can investor-paid credit rating agencies improve the information quality of issuer-paid rating agencies? Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2), 450–468. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B. (2016). Does fair value accounting exacerbate the procyclicality of bank lending? Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 235–274. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K. L. (2012). Transnational regulatory capture? An empirical examination of the transnational lobbying of the Basel Committee on banking supervision. Review of International Political Economy, 19(4), 663–688. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2011.624976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A. (2012). The evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the challenges it faces. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 807–837. doi: 10.2308/accr-10244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., Faude, B., & Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2018). Overlapping spheres of authority and interface conflicts in the global order: Introducing a DFG research group. WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin.
   Google Scholar