Subsidiarity watchdogs and the kennel of trilogues: when do they bark? The role of National Parliaments in trilogue negotiations

References

• Auel, K., & Benz, A. (2005). The politics of adaptation: The Europeanisation of national parliamentary systems. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500273570
   Google Scholar
• Auel, K., & Neuhold, C. (2017a). Europeanisation of NPs in European Union Member States: Experiences and best-practices (Report for European Parliament). Greens/EFA Group.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, K., & Neuhold, C. (2017b). Multi-arena players in the making? Conceptualizing the role of NPs since the Lisbon Treaty. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(10), 1547–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1228694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., & Kröger, S. (2014). Domesticating the democratic deficit? The role of NPs and parties in the EU’s system of governance. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2015). Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking. European Union Politics, 16(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515584497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2019). Transparency of EU informal trilogues through public feedback in the European Parliament: Promise unfulfilled. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1464–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1528295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, I. (2006). The watchdogs of subsidiarity: National parliaments and the logic of arguing in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00623.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COSAC. (2009). 12th Bi-annual Report. https://cosac.eu/documents/bi-annual-reports-of-cosac
   Google Scholar
• COSAC. (2013). 19th Bi-annual Report. http://cosac.eu/documents/bi-annual-reports-of-cosac
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D., & Leino, P. (2017). In search of transparency for EU law-making: Trilogues on the cusp of dawn. Common Market Law Review, 54(6), 1673–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R. (2013). Under the radar? NPs and the ordinary legislative procedure in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8), 1196–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.760328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R., & Neuhold, C. (2012). Why is fast track the way to go? Justifications for early agreement in the co-decision procedure and their effects. European Law Journal, 18(4), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P. (2012). Why the early warning mechanism does not alleviate the democratic deficit. OPAL Online Paper, 6.
   Google Scholar
• European Ombudsman. (2015). Decision of the European Ombudsman setting out proposals following her strategic inquiry OI/8/2015/JAS concerning the transparency of Trilogues. https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/fr/decision/en/69206
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J., & Roederer-Rynning, C. (2019). In the shadow of public opinion: The European Parliament, civil society organizations, and the politicization of trilogues. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefftler, C., Neuhold, C., Rozenberg, O., & Smith, J. (Eds). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of NPs. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerner, J. M. (2017). Real scrutiny or smoke and mirrors: The determinants and role of resolutions of national parliaments in European Union affairs. European Union Politics, 18(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516688803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högenauer, A. L., & Neuhold, C. (2015). NPs after Lisbon: Administrations on the rise? West European Politics, 38(2), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.990698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. D., & Sindbjerg Martinsen, D. (2015). Out of time? – NPs and early decision making in the European Union. Government and Opposition, 50(2), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., & Persson, T. (2018). The alleged opposition deficit in European Union politics: Myth or reality? Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 888–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreilinger, V. (2013). The new inter-parliamentary conference for economic and financial governance. Notre Europe Policy Paper, 100.
   Google Scholar
• Lammert, N. (2009, 1 December). Europa der Bürger – Parlamentarische Perspektiven der Union nach dem Lissabon-Vertrag. Speech at the Humboldt University.
   Google Scholar
• Lindseth, P. (2010). Power and legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation State. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, A., & Wessels, W. (2001). National Parliaments after Amsterdam: Losers or latecomers? Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Miklin, E. (2015). The Austrian parliament and EU affairs: Gradually living up to its legal potential. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 389–406). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhold, C., & Högenauer, A. L. (2016). An information network of officials? Dissecting the role and nature of the network of parliamentary representatives in the European parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies, 22(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2016.1163884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brennan, J., & Raunio, T. (2007). National parliaments within the enlarged European Union from victims of integration to competitive actors? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., & Reh, C. (2013). The consequences of concluding codecision early: Trilogues and intra-institutional bargaining success. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1006–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, T. (2011). The gatekeepers of European integration? The functions of national parliaments in the EU political system. Journal of European Integration, 33(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546848
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., & Hix, S. (2000). Backbenchers learn to fight back: European integration and parliamentary government. West European Politics, 23(4), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380008425404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2018). The European Parliament. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., & Pannning, L. (2019). Preparatory bodies as mediators of political conflict in trilogues: The European parliament’s shadows meetings. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2015). The culture of trilogues. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1148–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.992934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2017). The European parliament as a developing legislature: coming of age in trilogues? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1184297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, S., & De Ruiter, R. (2019). Scrutiny by means of debate. The Dutch parliamentary debate about the Banking Union. Acta Politica, 54(4), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0091-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprungk, C. (2013). A new type of representative democracy? Reconsidering the role of NPs in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1990). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2012). National parliamentary control of European Union affairs: A cross-national and longitudinal comparison. West European Politics, 35(3), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T., De Ruiter, R., & Rocabert, J. (2018). Is parliamentary attention to the EU strongest when it is needed the most? National parliaments and the selective debate of EU policies. European Union Politics, 19(3), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518763281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar