Trilogues in Council: disrupting the diplomatic culture?

References

• Beyers, J., & Dierickx, G. (1998). The working groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or intergovernmental negotiations? Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(3), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. (2005). Principals, agents and the implementation of EU cohesion policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), 624–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500160136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2015). Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking. European Union Politics, 16(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515584497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2019). Transparency of EU informal trilogues through public feedback in the European Parliament: Promise unfulfilled. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1464–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1528295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J., & Hoppe, A. (2020). He who controls the process controls the outcome? A reappraisal of the relais actor thesis. Journal of European Integration, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J., & Meijer, A. (2020). Transparency and the efficiency of multi-actor decision-making processes: An empirical analysis of 244 decisions in the European Union. International Review of the Administrative Sciences, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C., & Carter, N. (2010). Is co-decision good for the environment? An analysis of the European Parliament’s Green credentials. Political Studies, 58(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00782.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2010). The state, power and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory? Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492609347562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2001). Text of the Presidency to the Working Party on Financial Services (collateral) on ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on financial collateral arrangements’. 6 November 2001. Interinstitutional file 2001/0086.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. M., & Leino, P. (2017). In search of transparency for EU law-making: Trilogues on the cusp of dawn. Common Market Law Review, 54(6), 1673–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delreux, T., & Adriaensen, J. (2017). The Principal-Agent Model and the European Union. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionigi, M. K., & Koop, C. (2017). ‘Investigation of informal trilogue negotiations since the Lisbon Treaty: Added value, lack of transparency, and possible democratic deficit’. Report for the European Economic and Social Committee. CES/CSS/13/2016 23284.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2004). Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision making: Early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1184–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004269833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Court of the European Union. (2018). Ruling of 22 March (Seventh Chamber). Emiliano De Capitani v European Parliament. Case T540/15, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62015TJ0540 accessed on 22 August 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J., & Roederer-Rynning, C. (2019). In the shadow of public opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organisations and the politicisation of trilogues. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J., & Roederer-Rynning, C. (2020). Power at the expense of diffuse interests? The European Parliament as a legitimacy-seeking institution. European Politics and Society, 21(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1613879
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., Bailer, S., & Herzog, A. (2019). Signals to their parliaments? Governments’ use of votes and policy statements in the EU Council. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes-Renshaw, F., & Wallace, H. (2006). The Council of Ministers (2nd ed.). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Häge, F., & Naurin, D. (2013). The effect of codecision on Council decision-making: Informalization, politicization and power. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 953–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., & Reh, C. (2012). Codecision and its discontents: Intra-organisational politics and institutional reform in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 35(5), 1134–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.706414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt, M. Z., & Novak, S. (2016). ‘Integration without transparency’? Reliance on the space to think in the European Council and Council. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1178249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., & Wratil, C. (2020). Contestation and responsiveness in EU Council deliberations. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. (2011). The Political and Security Committee: A case study in ‘ Supranational Intergovernmentalism. In R. Dehousse (Ed.), The ‘community method’: Obstinate or obsolete? (pp. 91–117). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, K., & Shackleton, M. (2013). Codecision: A practitioner's view from inside the Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacqué, J. P. (2009). Une vision réaliste de la procedure de codécision [A realistic viewpoint of the co-decision procedure]. In A. De Walsche & L. Levi (Eds.), Mélanges en hommage à Georges Vandersanden [Essays in honour of Georges Vandersanden] (pp. 183–202). Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Kaniok, P. (2016). In the shadow of consensus: Communication within Council working groups. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(4), 881–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2000). The methods of Community in EU decision-making and administrative rivalry in the Council’s infrastructure. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017600343197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2005). The Janus face of Brussels: Socialization and everyday decision making in the European Union. International Organization, 59(4), 937–971. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2010). How institutional environments facilitate co-operative negotiation styles in EU decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003748591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2015). The Council of the European Union and the European Council. In J. M. Magone (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of European of European Politics (pp. 219–234). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2005). The fallacy of tightening the reins. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 34(3), 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2009). A “selection model” of political representation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2011). Clarifying the concept of representation. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbock, M., & Tosun, J. (2018). Responsiveness to different national interests: Voting behaviour on genetically modified organisms in the Council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, D. (2015). Generosity in intergovernmental negotiations: The impact of state power, pooling and socialisation in the Council of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 54(4), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, D., & Rasmussen, A. (2011). New external rules, new internal games: How the EU institutions respond when inter-institutional rules change. West European Politics, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A., & Mak, J. (2010). (How) Do norms guide presidency behaviour in EU negotiations? Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003748732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, S. (2013). The silence of ministers: Consensus and blame avoidance in the Council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1091–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, S., & Hillebrandt, M. Z. (2020). Analysing the trade-off between transparency and efficiency in the Council of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1578814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, R. (2019). Red lines and red tapes: Chains of delegation in inter-institutional and intra-Council negotiations under the ordinary legislative procedure of the European Union. (Master’s thesis), University of Southern Denmark: Department of Political Science and Public Management.
   Google Scholar
• Reh, C. (2014). Is informal politics undemocratic? Trilogues, early agreement and the selection model of representation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(6), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.910247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh, C., & Wallace, H. (forthcoming). An institutional anatomy and five policy modes’. In H. Wallace, M. A. Pollack, C. Roederer-Rynning, & A. R. Young (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (pp. 68-104). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. (2009). Representation rethought: On trustees, delegates, and gyroscopes in the study of political representation and democracy. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. (2011). The concepts of representation. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 631–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2015). Institutional and policy change in the European Parliament: Deciding on freedom, security and justice. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2018). The European Parliament. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., & Goetz, K. (2018). Secrecy in Europe. West European Politics, 41(4), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1423456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2015). The culture of trilogues. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1148–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.992934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2017). The European Parliament as a developing legislature: Coming of age in trilogues? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1184297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton, M. (2000). The politics of codecision. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton, M., & Raunio, T. (2003). Codecision since Amsterdam: A laboratory for institutional innovation and change. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000058982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2003). The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000046903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warntjen, A. (2010). Between bargaining and deliberation: Decision-making in the Council of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003748641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar