Agency slack as cause of deviation in trilogue negotiations

References

• Baissa, D. K., & Rainey, C. (2020). When BLUE is not best: Non-normal errors and the linear model. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, J.F. (1965). Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19(2), 317–343.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J., Glazer, A., & Hammond, T. (2001). Theories of delegation. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 235–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetto *, Giacomo. (2005). Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: the dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe's parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000311916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2015). Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking. European Union Politics, 16(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515584497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2019). Transparency of EU informal trilogues through public feedback in the European Parliament: Promise unfulfilled. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1464–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1528295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J., & Hoppe, A. (2020). ‘He who controls the process controls the outcome? A reappraisal of the relais actor thesis’. Journal of European Integration, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1753041. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2016). The impact of informalisation: Early agreements and voting cohesion in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 17(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515608704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A., & Thomson, R. (2015). Consultations with interest groups and the empowerment of executives: Evidence from the European Union. Governance, 28(4), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, O., Dehousse, R., & Trakalova, A. (2011). La codécision et les” accords précoces": Progrès ou détournement de la procédure législative? Notre Europe Etudes & Recherches, 84.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2010). The policy impact of leadership in committees: Rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament’s opinions. European Union Politics, 11(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510353459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombez, C., & Hix, S. (2015). Legislative activity and Gridlock in the European Union. British Journal of Political Science, 45(03), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000380
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. P., & Hermansson, H. (2017). Legislative amendments and informal politics in the European Union: A text reuse approach. European Union Politics, 18(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517717071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, D., & Leino, P. (2017). In search of transparency for EU law-making: Trilogues on the cusp of Dawn. Common Market Law Review, 54(6), 1673–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. (2009). Cooperation and control in the European Union: The case of the European Union as international environmental negotiator. Cooperation and Conflict, 44(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836709102739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delreux, T., & Adriaensen, J. (2017). Introduction. Use and limitations of the principal–agent model in studying the European Union. In T. Delreux & J. Adriaensen (Eds.), The principal agent model and the European Union (pp. 1–34). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T., & Laloux, T. (2018). Concluding early agreements in the EU: A double principal-agent analysis of trilogue negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R., & Neuhold, C. (2012). Why is fast track the way to go? Justifications for early agreement in the Co-decision procedure and their effects. European Law Journal, 18(4), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2004). Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision making: Early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1184–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004269833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häge, F. M., & Naurin, D. (2013). The effect of codecision on Council decision-making: Informalization, politicization and power. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 953–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häge, F., & Ringe, N. (2019). Rapporteur-shadow rapporteur networks in the European Parliament: The strength of small numbers. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.G., Lake, D.A., Nielson, D.L. and Tierney, M.J. (2006). Delegation under anarchy: states, international organizations and principal agent theory. In D.G. Hawkins, D.A. Lake, D.L. Nielson, and M.J. Tierney (Eds.), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (pp. 4–31). New-York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., & Reh, C. (2012). Codecision and its discontents: Intra-organisational politics and institutional reform in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 35(5), 1134–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.706414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Mads Dagnis, & Martinsen, Dorte. (2015). Out of Time? National Parliaments and Early Decision-Making in the European Union. Government and Opposition, 50(2), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, D., & Earnshaw, D. (2011). ‘Relais actors’ and co-decision first reading agreements in the European Parliament: The case of the advanced therapies regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.520877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Sagarzazu, I. (2013). Ideological congruency and decision-making speed: The effect of partisanship across European Union institutions. European Union Politics, 14(3), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512472938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovats, L. (2009). Do elections set the pace? A quantitative assessment of the timing of European legislation. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802589255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laloux, T. (2020). Informal negotiations in EU legislative decision-making: A systematic review and research agenda. European Political Science, 19(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-019-00213-5.
   Google Scholar
• Laloux, T., & Delreux, T. (2018). How much do agents in trilogues deviate from their principals’ instructions? Introducing a deviation index. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1428215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. (2013). The democratic legitimacy of codecision. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1056–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlböck, M., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The council, the European parliament, and the paradox of inter-institutional cooperation. EIOP European Integration Online Papers, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2019). The ‘political’ roles of the European Commission. Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1572135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., & Reh, C. (2013). The consequences of concluding codecision early: Trilogues and intra-institutional bargaining success. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1006–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh, C. (2014). Is informal politics undemocratic? Trilogues, early agreements and the selection model of representation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(6), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.910247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., & Panning, L. (2019). Preparatory bodies as mediators of political conflict in trilogues: The European Parliament’s shadows meetings. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2015). The culture of trilogues. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1148–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.992934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2017). The European Parliament as a developing legislature: Coming of age in trilogues? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1184297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2020). ‘Black boxes and open secrets: Trilogues as ‘politicised diplomacy’’. West European Politics, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1716526. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. F., & Finan, C. (2018). Linear regression and the normality assumption. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 98, 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-agent models: An expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 8(2), 173–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377
   Google Scholar