Inside the black box of trilogues: introduction to the special issue

References

• Brandsma, G. J. (2015). Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union law-making. European Union Politics, 16(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515584497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2019). Transparency of EU informal trilogues through public feedback in the European Parliament: Promise unfulfilled. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1464–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1528295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J., & Hoppe, A. (2020). He who controls the process controls the outcome? A reappraisal of the relais actor thesis. Journal of European Integration, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, D., & Leino, P. (2017). In search of transparency for EU law making: Trilogues on the Cusp of Dawn. Common Market Law Review, 54, 1673–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Ombudsman. (2016). ‘Decision of the European Ombudsman setting out proposals following her strategic inquiry OI/8/2015/JAS concerning the transparency of Trilogues. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/decision/en/69206
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2017). Interinstitutional Negotiations. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ordinary-legislative-procedure/en/interinstitutional-negotiations
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2019). Activity Report: Development and Trends of the Ordinary Legislative Procedure (1 July 2014–1 July 2019). Retrieved October 2019, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/198024/activity-report-2014-2019_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2004). Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision-making: Early agreements under co-decision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1184–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004269833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Court of the European Union. (2018). Ruling of 22 March (Seventh Chamber). Emiliano De Capitani v European Parliament, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Decision A(2015) 4931 of the European Parliament of 8 July 2015, refusing to grant the applicant full access to the documents LIBE-2013-0091-02 and LIBE-2013-0091-03. Case T540/15. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62015TJ0540
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J., & Roederer-Rynning, C. (2019). ‘Taming trilogues: The EU’s law-making process in a comparative perspective’. In O. Costa (Ed.), The European Parliament in times of EU crisis (pp. 121–141). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S., & Høyland, B. (2010). Bicameral politics in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., & Reh, C. (2012). Codecision and its discontents: Intra organisational politics and institutional reform in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 35(5), 1134–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.706414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt, M., & Novak, S. (2016). ‘Integration without transparency’? Reliance on the space to think in the European Council and Council. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1178249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, A. (2020). The Devil is in the Process: an analysis of the impact of negotiation processes in trilogues on EU legislation. (PhD thesis). University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, D., & Earnshaw, D. (2011). “Relais actors” and co-decision first reading agreements in the European Parliament: The case of the advanced therapies regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.520877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., & Panning, L. (2019). Preparatory bodies as mediators of political conflict in trilogues: The European Parliament’s shadows meetings. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2015). The culture of trilogues. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1148–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.992934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2021). Black boxes and open secrets: Trilogues as ‘politicised diplomacy’. West European Politics, 44(3), 485–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1716526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén, G., & Stie, A. E. (2020). Balancing seclusion and inclusion: EU trilogues and democratic accountability. Journal of European Public Policy, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, E. (2020). The European Parliament’s mandate for trilogues: Explaining the discretion of political group advisors. Journal of European Public Policy, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton, M., & Raunio, T. (2003). Codecision since Amsterdam: A laboratory for institutional innovation and change. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000058982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (2011). Resolving controversy in the European Union: Legislative decision-making before and after enlargement. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar